dc.contributorAmaya Gómez, Santiago
dc.contributorBarrero Guzmán, Tomás Andrés
dc.creatorAvendaño Morales, José Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T19:29:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T00:25:26Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T19:29:22Z
dc.date.available2023-09-07T00:25:26Z
dc.date.created2023-06-06T19:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-06
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1992/67251
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8727383
dc.description.abstractEn su artículo "The Imperative View of Pain" David Bain rechaza la idea de que el dolor es un comando experiencial. Para este filósofo no es claro cómo el imperativismo o los comandos imperativos explican el carácter desagradable y aversivo del dolor. De esta manera, Bain plantea el "reto hedomotivo", la tarea filosófica de comprender la naturaleza y relación entre el tono hedónico y la fuerza motivacional del dolor. Aunque Bain destaca la noción de intensidad a favor del imperativismo, también critica su falta de capacidad explicativa en términos de la experiencia desagradable del dolor. Para dar respuesta a este reto, este artículo examina diferentes teorías filosóficas del dolor y aboga por una perspectiva evaluativa para comprender su naturaleza.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Andes
dc.publisherFilosofía
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias Sociales
dc.publisherDepartamento de Filosofía
dc.relationAlarcos, E. (1978). Estudios de Gramática Funcional del Español. Gredos.
dc.relationArmstrong, D. M. (1962). Bodily Sensations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
dc.relationArmstrong, D. M. (1968). A Materialist Theory of the Mind. New York: Humanities. Routledge. Edited by Ted Honderich.
dc.relationAydede, M. (2006). Pain: New essays on its nature and the methodology of its study. Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relationBain, David (2017). Evaluativist Accounts of Pain's Unpleasantness. In Jennifer Corns (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Pain. London: Routledge. pp. 40- 50.
dc.relationBain, D. (2003). Intentionalism and pain. Philosophical Quarterly 53. (213): pp. 502-523.
dc.relationBain, D. (2013). Pains that don¿t hurt. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 92(2), pp. 305-320.
dc.relationBain, D. (2011). The Imperative View of Pain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18.
dc.relationBennet, H. (2002). Felt Evaluations: A Theory of Pleasure and Pain. American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 13-30.
dc.relationBerridge, K. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology and Behavior, 81, 179-209.
dc.relationBlock, N. (1996). Mental paint and mental latex. Philosophical Issues. 7:19-49.
dc.relationBourget, D. y Mendelovici, A. (2013). Tracking representationalism: Lycan, Drestske, and Tye. Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers. pp. 209-236.
dc.relationBroad, C. (1959). Scientific Thought. Paterson, NJ: Littlefield Adams.
dc.relationChalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
dc.relationCharland, L. (1995). Feeling and Representing: Computational Theory and the Modularity of Affect. Synthese. 105. 273-301.
dc.relationCharland, L. (2006). Cognitive Modularity of Emotion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 36 (5 (Supp.): 213-228.
dc.relationClark, A. (2005). Painfulness is not a quale. In M. Aydede (Ed.), Pain: New essays on its nature and the methodology of its study (pp. 177¿197). Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relationCorns, J. (2014). The Inadequacy of Unitary Characterizations of Pain. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, pp. 355-378.
dc.relationCorns, J. (2014). Unpleasantness, motivational oomph, and painfulness. Mind and Language, 29 (2). pp. 238-254.
dc.relationCutter, B. y M. Tye. 2011. Tracking representationalism and the painfulness of pain. Philosophical Issues 21: 90-109.
dc.relationDavidson, D. (1980). Mental Events. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207-227.
dc.relationde Vignemont, F., & Jacob, P. (2012). What Is It like to Feel Another's Pain? Philosophy of Science, 79(2), 295-316.
dc.relationFodor J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
dc.relationGenone, J. (2014). Appearance and Illusion. Mind. April. Vol. 123. No. 490. pp. 339-376.
dc.relationGray, V. (2013). Pleasure gone awry? A new conceptualization of chronic pain and addiction. Philosophy, Psychology and Psychiatry & Behavioural Science, University of Cincinnati. 5:71-85.
dc.relationGustafson, D. (2005). Categorizing pain. In M. Aydede (Ed.), Pain: New essays on its nature and the methodology of its study (pp. 219-241). Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relationHall, R. (2008). If it itches, scratch! Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(4):525-535.
dc.relationHead, H., & G. Holmes. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain. 34: 102-254.
dc.relationHelm, Bennett W. (2002). Felt evaluations: A theory of pleasure and pain. American Philosophical Quarterly 39. (1):13-30.
dc.relationJackson. F. (1977). Perception: A Representative Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge.
dc.relationJakob, C. (1911). La histoarquitectura comparada de la corteza cerebral y su significación para la psicología moderna. Archivos de Psiquiatría, Criminología y ciencias afines. X, 385-387.
dc.relationJanet, P. (1889). L'Automatisme Psychologique. Paris: Alcan.
dc.relationKant, I. (2003). Crítica de la razón pura. (Traducción de Pedro Ribas). Madrid: Alfaguara.
dc.relationKlein, Colin (2007). An Imperative Theory of Pain. Journal of Philosophy 104 (10): 517-532.
dc.relationKripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. pp. 150.
dc.relationLocke, John. (1999). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relationMcGinn, Colin (1982). The Character of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationMoore, G. E. (1903). "The Refutation of Idealism", Mind, new series 12(4): 433-453.
dc.relationMoore, G.E. (1913). "The Status of Sense-Data", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 14: 355-380.
dc.relationPitcher, G. (1970). Pain Perception. The Philosophical Review. Vol. 79, No. 3. pp. 368-393.
dc.relationPrice, H. (1950). Perception, London: Methuen.
dc.relationRussell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate editorial.
dc.relationTye, M. (2005). Another Look at Representationalism About Pain. In M. Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 99-120.
dc.relationTye, M. (1995). A Representational Theory of Pains and their Phenomenal Character. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 9.
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.titleEl dolor y su aspecto hedomotivo
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregrado


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución