dc.contributor | Sánchez Silva, Edgar Mauricio | |
dc.contributor | Estrada Mejía, Nicolás | |
dc.contributor | GEOSI | |
dc.creator | Calderón Guevara, Wilmar Andrés | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-23T18:40:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-06T23:51:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-23T18:40:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-06T23:51:54Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-23T18:40:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-02 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1992/67855 | |
dc.identifier | instname:Universidad de los Andes | |
dc.identifier | reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca | |
dc.identifier | repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8726902 | |
dc.description.abstract | Development of sustainable infrastructure facilities is raising high interest worldwide due to the need of creating infrastructure while keeping resource management and capacity of the elements as effective as possible, in a highly uncertain demand for the future. With this in mind, this study implemented an extended application from (Sánchez-Silva and Calderón-Guevara, 2022) to include flexibility into infrastructure system management to include sustainability, service and economic goals into the development of an airport system. Method considered a multi-step framework to execute a multi-step simulation process to execute a dynamic programming that evaluated how an intervention policy can perform under multiple scenarios to determine which can be the planning guideline for an infrastructure system. Analysis performed, considered a case study of the three main airports of Colombia, Bogotá, Medellín and Cali, to obtain a set of intervention policies for each airport to determine the best alternative for infrastructure development of these facilities. Results from this framework outlines that the current system should prioritize the investments in gates facilities to ease the airports accommodate a growing demand. Proposed policy was based on a risk, return and service evaluation that yielded a planning alternative with positive returns in all the airports of the system. Furthermore, this study identifies that future research can be guided into (i) the optimization of a network wide operations scheduling system which can further optimize the operations of runways that are one of the most costly investments of the network, and (ii) the implementation of this method in other developing countries to guide a decision making process to maximize investments in infrastructure in multiple places of the world. | |
dc.description.abstract | El desarrollo de infraestructura sostenible está despertando un gran interés en todo el mundo debido a la necesidad de crear infraestructura manteniendo una gestión de recursos y una capacidad de las estructuras de la manera más efectiva posible, en una demanda altamente incierta para el futuro. Con esta idea en mente, este estudio implementó una aplicación extendida de (Sánchez-Silva & Calderón-Guevara, 2022) para incluir flexibilidad en la gestión de un sistema de infraestructura para incluir objetivos de sostenibilidad, servicio y económicos en el desarrollo de un sistema aeroportuario. Este método consideró un proceso de simulaciones de varios pasos para ejecutar una programación dinámica que evaluó cómo puede funcionar una política de intervención en múltiples escenarios, para determinar cuál puede ser la guía de planificación para un sistema de infraestructura. El análisis realizado, consideró un caso de estudio de los tres principales aeropuertos de Colombia, Bogotá, Medellín y Cali, para obtener un conjunto de políticas de intervención de cada aeropuerto que determine la mejor alternativa para el desarrollo de la infraestructura de estas instalaciones. Los resultados de esta implementación muestran que el sistema actual debe priorizar las inversiones en instalaciones de puertas de embarque para facilitar que los aeropuertos se adapten a una demanda creciente. La política propuesta se basó en una evaluación de riesgo, retorno y servicio que arrojó una alternativa de planificación con retornos positivos en todos los aeropuertos del sistema. Además, este estudio identifica que se futuras investigaciones se pueden centrar en (i) la optimización de un sistema de programación de operaciones en toda la red que puede optimizar aún más las operaciones de las pistas que son una de las inversiones más costosas de la red, y (ii) la implementación de este método en otros países en desarrollo para guiar un proceso de toma de decisiones para maximizar las inversiones en infraestructura en múltiples lugares del mundo. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de los Andes | |
dc.publisher | Maestría en Ingeniería Civil | |
dc.publisher | Facultad de Ingeniería | |
dc.publisher | Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental | |
dc.relation | Crundwell, F., 2008. Finance for Engineers: Evaluation and Funding of Capital Projects. 1
ed., Springer London, London. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-033-9. | |
dc.relation | De Neufville, R., 2008. Low-cost airports for low-cost airlines: Flexible design to manage
the risks. Transportation Planning and Technology 31, 35-68. URL: https://doi.org/
10.1080/03081060701835688, doi:10.1080/03081060701835688. | |
dc.relation | De Neufville, R., Lee, Y.S., Scholtes, S., 2008. Using flexibility to improve value-for-money
in hospital infrastructure investments, in: 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure
Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA), pp.
1-6. doi:10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439668. | |
dc.relation | Farhadi, F., 2014. Runway Operations Management: Models, Enhancements, and Decomposition
Techniques. doi:https://doi.org/10.7275/8hqn-2p41. | |
dc.relation | Global Infrastructure Hub, 2018. Global Infrastructure Outlook: Infrastructure investment
needs 56 countries, 7 sectors to 2040. URL: https://cdn.gihub.org/outlook/live/
methodology/Global+Infrastructure+Outlook+factsheet+-+June+2018.pdf. | |
dc.relation | Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F.X., Sproule, W.J., Young, S.B., 2010. Planning and Design
of Airports. 5th edition ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York. URL: https://www.
accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071446419. | |
dc.relation | Kayap¿nar, S., Erginel, N., 2019. Designing the airport service with fuzzy QFD based
on SERVQUAL integrated with a fuzzy multi-objective decision model. Total Quality
Management and Business Excellence 30, 1429-1448. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/
14783363.2017.1371586, doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1371586. | |
dc.relation | Kósmieja, M., Paslawski, J., 2015. Flexible Approach in Designing Infrastructure. Procedia
Engineering 122, 104-111. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/
pii/S1877705815031021, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.013. | |
dc.relation | Lee, Y.H., Yoo, K.E., Park, C.H., 2012. Airport design and development. Transportation
engineering and planning 1. | |
dc.relation | Lozano, J.M., Zuluaga, S., S´anchez-Silva, M., 2020. Developing flexible management
strategies in infrastructure: The sequential expansion problem for infrastructure analysis
(SEPIA). Reliability Engineering & System Safety 200, 106951. URL: https:
//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832019310695, doi:https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106951. | |
dc.relation | de Neufville, R., Odoni, A.R., Belobaba, P.P., Reynolds, T.G., 2013. Airport Systems:
Planning, Design, and Management. 2nd ed. ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
URL: https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071770583.
29 | |
dc.relation | Oliveira, A., Couto, G., Pimentel, P., 2021. Uncertainty and flexibility in infrastructure
investments: Application of real options analysis to the Ponta Delgada airport expansion.
Research in Transportation Economics 90, 100845. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.
com/science/article/pii/S0739885920300342, doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100845. | |
dc.relation | Powell, W., 2011. Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality.
Wiley seri ed., Wiley. | |
dc.relation | Sánchez-Silva, M., 2018. Providing Flexibility to Infrastructure Design to Improve Cost
Efficiency. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 24, 4017050. URL: https://doi.org/10.
1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000414, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000414. | |
dc.relation | Sánchez-Silva, M., 2021. Design of flexible and adaptable infrastructure systems. Infrastructure
Asset Management 8, 36-48. URL: https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.20.00019,
doi:10.1680/jinam.20.00019. | |
dc.relation | Sánchez-Silva, M., Calderón-Guevara, W., 2022. Flexibility and adaptability within the
context of decision-making in infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure
Engineering , 1-17. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2038642, doi:10.
1080/15732479.2022.2038642. | |
dc.relation | Shuchi, S., Drogemuller, R., Buys, L., 2018. Flexibility in airport terminals: Identification
of design factors. Journal of Airport Management 12. | |
dc.relation | Silva Gaitán, M., 2020. Escenarios post pandemia para la demanda de pasajeros del aeropuerto
internacional el dorado de Bogotá. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1992/51446. | |
dc.relation | Swanson, R., Vivek, S., 2020. Appropriating the Value of Flexibility in PPP Megaproject
Design. Journal of Management in Engineering 36, 5020010. URL: https://doi.org/
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000770, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000770. | |
dc.relation | Taneja, P., Vellinga, T., Ros, R., 2014. Role of Flexibility in Sustainable Port Development
BT - Infranomics: Sustainability, Engineering Design and Governance,
Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 41¿53. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/
978-3-319-02493-6{_}4, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02493-6_4. | |
dc.relation | Tong, Z., Chung-Li, T., 2003. Valuing Flexibility in Infrastructure Expansion. Journal
of Infrastructure Systems 9, 89-97. URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
1076-0342(2003)9:3(89), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:3(89). | |
dc.relation | Torres-Rincón, S., Sánchez-Silva, M., Bastidas-Arteaga, E., 2021. A multistage
stochastic program for the design and management of flexible infrastructure networks.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 210, 107549. URL: https:
//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021001046, doi:https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107549. | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.rights | https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/static/pdf/aceptacion_uso_es.pdf | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.title | Incorporating flexibility in infrastructure systems planning & management | |
dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Maestría | |