Género, sanción y cooperación en el manejo sostenible de los recursos naturales: Evidencia experimental en el Pacífico colombiano

dc.contributorVélez Lesmes, María Alejandra
dc.contributorRodríguez Ramírez, Luz Angela
dc.contributorMaldonado, Jorge Higinio
dc.creatorRubiano Lizarazo, María Juliana
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T18:45:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T23:43:02Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T18:45:16Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T23:43:02Z
dc.date.created2023-06-20T18:45:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-04
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1992/67693
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8726768
dc.description.abstractHay un debate sobre el rol del género en la cooperación y manejo de recursos naturales. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han evaluado empíricamente cómo interactúa la composición de género de los grupos de usuarios ante la implementación de sanciones no monetarias en contextos de recursos de uso común. Mediante un experimento económico en campo con usuarios del molusco piangüa en el Pacífico Colombiano testeo cómo las dinámicas de extracción son influenciadas por la composición de género de los grupos de usuarios, y su interacción con la implementación de una a) sanción social y b) sanción social con comunicación. Los resultados revelan un efecto diferencial del género en diferentes composiciones de grupos. Encuentro que, en acceso abierto, la composición de género no es determinante para los comportamientos de extracción de la piangüa. Sin embargo, una vez se introduce la sanción social hay variaciones significativas por grupos de tratamiento en el comportamiento individual de extracción. El grupo de solo mujeres tiene un comportamiento más cooperativo una vez se introduce la sanción social. Luego, cuando la sanción social con comunicación se activó, la acción colectiva resultó en la extracción más baja de piangüa de todos los grupos de tratamiento. Discuto posibles factores socioculturales que pueden explicar estos resultados.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Andes
dc.publisherMaestría en Economía Aplicada
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía
dc.relationAgarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World development, 29(10), 1623-1648.
dc.relationAgarwal, B. (2000). Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters. Cambridge journal of economics, 24(3), 283-310.
dc.relationAgarwal, B. (2009). Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecological economics, 68(11), 2785-2799.
dc.relationAnderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J. C., Castillo, D., Lopez, M. C., ... & Wutich, A. (2011). The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1571-1579.
dc.relationBalliet, D. (2010). Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(1), 39-57.
dc.relationBarrero-Amórtegui, Y., & Maldonado, J. (2021). Gender composition of management groups in a conservation agreement framework: Experimental evidence for mangrove use in the Colombian Pacific. World Development, 142, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105449
dc.relationBergh, A., & Wichardt, P. C. (2018). Accounting for context: Separating monetary and (uncertain) social incentives. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 72, 61-66.
dc.relationBowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2005). 13 Social Capital, Moral Sentiments, and Community Governance. Moral sentiments and material interests, 379.
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., Ahn, T. K., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Communication and co-operation in a common-pool resource dilemma: A field experiment. In Advances in understanding strategic behaviour (pp. 258-286). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C. (2009). Dilemas de lo colectivo: Instituciones, pobreza y cooperación en el manejo local de los recursos de uso común. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C. (2016). Human behavior and the use of experiments to understand the agricultural, resource, and environmental challenges of the XXI century. Agricultural Economics, 47, 61-71.
dc.relationCarpenter, Jeffrey, Amrita G. Daniere and Lois M. Takahashi. 2004. ¿Cooperation, Trust and Social Capital in Southeast Asian Urban Slums.¿ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(4), 533-551
dc.relationCastillo, D., Bousquet, F., Janssen, M. A., Worrapimphong, K., & Cardenas, J. C. (2011). Context matters to explain field experiments: results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1609-1620.
dc.relationCharness, G., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Gender differences in cooperation with group membership. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(1), 77-85.
dc.relationConsejo Comunitario de Bahía Málaga (CCBM). (2017). Plan de Bienestar Étnico Territorial del Consejo Comunitario de las Comunidades Negras de La Plata-Bahía Málaga: 2019-2028. Cali: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Instituto de Estudios Interculturales.
dc.relationCroson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
dc.relationDugar, S. (2010). Nonmonetary sanctions and rewards in an experimental coordination game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73(3), 377-386.
dc.relationDugar, S. (2013). Non-monetary incentives and opportunistic behavior: Evidence from a laboratory public good game. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1374-1388.
dc.relationFehr, Ernst and Simon Gächter. 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments." American Economic Review, 90(4), 980-994.
dc.relationGächter, S., & Fehr, E. (1999). Collective action as a social exchange. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 39(4), 341-369.
dc.relationGächter, S., Herrmann, B., 2011. The limits of self-governance when cooperators get punished: experimental evidence from urban and rural Russia. Eur. Econ. Rev. 55, 193-210
dc.relationGerkey, D. (2013). Cooperation in context: Public goods games and post-Soviet collectives in Kamchatka, Russia. Current Anthropology, 54(2), 144-176.
dc.relationGlöckner, A., Kube, S., & Nicklisch, A. (2018). The joint benefits of observed and unobserved social sanctions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 75, 105-116.
dc.relationGuber, R. (2019). La etnografía: método, campo y reflexividad. Siglo XXI editores.
dc.relationHardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390450903037302
dc.relationHayo, B., & Vollan, B. (2012). Group interaction, heterogeneity, rules, and co-operative behaviour: Evidence from a common-pool resource experiment in South Africa and Namibia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 9-28.
dc.relationHerrmann, B., Thoni, C., Gächter, S., 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319 (5868), 1345-1346.
dc.relationHouser, D., Xiao, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2008). When punishment fails: Research on sanctions, intentions and non-cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2), 509-532.
dc.relationKamas, L., & Preston, A. (2015). Can social preferences explain gender differences in economic behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 525-539.
dc.relationKamas, L., & Preston, A. (2021). Empathy, gender, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 92, 101654.
dc.relationKrieg, J., & Samek, A. (2017). When charities compete: A laboratory experiment with simultaneous public goods. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 66, 40-57.
dc.relationLeibbrandt, A., Puerto, S., & Vélez, M. A. (2021). Regrouping to Reduce Overfishing: Evidence from a Series of Lab-in-the-Field Experiments in Mexico. Marine Resource Economics, 36(4), 319-340.
dc.relationLeisher, C., Temsah, G., Booker, F., Day, M., Samberg, L., Prosnitz, D., ... & Wilkie, D. (2016). Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1-10.
dc.relationLópez, M. C., Murphy, J. J., Spraggon, J. M., & Stranlund, J. K. (2012). Comparing the Effectiveness of Regulation and Pro-Social Emotions to Enhance Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Fishing Communities in Colombia. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 131-142.
dc.relationLópez, M. C., Murphy, J. J., Spraggon, J. M., & Stranlund, J. K. (2013). Does government regulation complement existing community efforts to support cooperation? Evidence from field experiments in Colombia. In Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relationMasclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., Villeval, M.C., 2003. Monetary and nonmonetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (1), 366-380.
dc.relationMelo, G., & Piaggio, M. (2015). The perils of peer punishment: Evidence from a common pool resource framed field experiment. Ecological Economics, 120, 376-393
dc.relationMiller, J. H., Butts, C. T., & Rode, D. (2002). Communication and cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47(2), 179-195
dc.relationMoffatt, P. G. (2015). Experimetrics: Econometrics for experimental economics. Macmillan International Higher Education
dc.relationNaar, N. (2020). Gaming anthropology: The problem of external validity and the challenge of interpreting experimental games. American Anthropologist, 122(4), 784-798.
dc.relationNoussair, C., & Tucker, S. (2005). Combining monetary and social sanctions to promote cooperation. Economic Inquiry, 43(3), 649-660
dc.relationOjeda, D. (2011). Género, naturaleza y política: Los estudios sobre género y medio ambiente. Historia Ambiental Latinoamericana Y Caribeña (HALAC) Revista De La Solcha, 1(1), 55-73. Recuperado a partir de https://www.halacsolcha.org/index.php/halac/article/view/159
dc.relationOstrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationPalacios, M & Cantera, J. (2017). Mangrove timber use as an ecosystem service in the Colombian Pacific. Hydrobiología 803:345-358
dc.relationPoteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective Action, The Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press.
dc.relationRege,M., Telle, K., 2004. The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. J. Public Econ. 88, 1625-1644
dc.relationRevollo-Fernández, D., Aguilar-Ibarra, A., Micheli, F., & Sáenz-Arroyo, A. (2016). Exploring the role of gender in common-pool resource extraction: evidence from laboratory and field experiments in fisheries. Applied Economics Letters, 23(13), 912-920
dc.relationRocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B & Wangari, E. (1996). (eds.) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. Nueva York: Routledge, 1996
dc.relationSemper, F. (2006). Los derechos de los pueblos indígenas de Colombia en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional. Anuario de derecho constitucional latinoamericano, 2, 761-778.
dc.relationValdivia, C & Gilles, J. (2001). Gender and resource management: Households and groups, strategies and transitions. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 5¿9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007608717996
dc.relationVelez, M. A., Stranlund, J. K., & Murphy, J. J. (2009). What motivates common pool resource users? Experimental evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 485-497.
dc.relationWilen, J. E., Cancino y, J. y Uchida, H. (2012). The Economics of Territorial Use Rights Fisheries, or TURFs. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6 (2), 237-257. doi:10.1093/reep/res012
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.titleGénero, sanción y cooperación en el manejo sostenible de los recursos naturales: Evidencia experimental en el Pacífico colombiano
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución