dc.creatorOyola Massy, Reinel David
dc.creatorOrtega Sanabria, Josué David
dc.date2020-06-08T17:25:21Z
dc.date2020-06-08T17:25:21Z
dc.date2020-06-07
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T21:57:02Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T21:57:02Z
dc.identifierHttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/2847
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8710881
dc.descriptionReading to learn is an instructional approach that leads students from aided to independent creation of meaning in reading and writing, it follows a cycle with a set of strategies guiding students to independent construction of a specific text-genre. Nevertheless, few studies have designed instructional units and lessons for the use of R2L to promote learners’ oral production, most specifically of oral exposition texts. Neither has it been researched yet the use of this methodology along with mediation tools in the EFL class. Therefore, this qualitative study is intended to describe the main characteristics an instructional unit and lesson based on R2L and flipped learning should contain to develop tenth-graders’ capacity to produce oral exposition discourses in an EFL class. As well as to identify the main adaptations EFL teachers should consider when integrating R2L and FL for developing students’ capacity to produce exposition oral genres. Previous to the unit design, a diagnostic lesson was conducted on tenth-graders in a public school from the rural side of Montería, Colombia. Throughout the intervention oral production tasks, audio recordings, observations, and document analysis were used to collect data for the present design. This study sheds light on the existing gap of knowledge about the design and implementation of R2L and Flipped instruction to prompt the participation of oral exposition texts in tenth-graders. Leer para aprender (R2L) es un enfoque instructivo que, siguiendo un ciclo con un conjunto de estrategias pedagógicas, lleva a los estudiantes de la ayuda a la creación independiente de significado en la lectura y la escritura, así como a la construcción independiente de géneros textuales específicos. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han diseñado unidades y lecciones instructivas para el uso de R2L enfocados a la producción oral de los estudiantes, específicamente de textos orales argumentativos. Además, la investigación del uso de esta metodología junto a herramientas de mediación tecnológica es casi nula en el campo de la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera. Por eso, este estudio cualitativo pretende describir las principales características que deben contener una unidad y lección instructiva basadas en R2L y el modelo de aula invertida, enfocadas en capacitar a alumnos de décimo grado para la producción de discursos argumentativos. El presente estudio también busca identificar las principales adaptaciones que los docentes deben considerar al momento de integrar R2L y herramientas tecnológicas en el aula de inglés como lengua extranjera, enfocados a la producción del género textual argumentativo. Antes del diseño de la unidad, una clase diagnóstica permitió identificar un bajo nivel de producción oral en alumnos de décimo grado en una escuela rural pública de Montería. Durante la intervención, tareas de producción oral, grabaciones de audio, observaciones y análisis de documentos permitieron recopilar información para el presente diseño. Este estudio permitirá esclarecer la brecha existente en la literatura concerniente al diseño e implementación de R2L y aula invertida para impulsar la participación alumnos de décimo grado en discursos argumentativos.
dc.descriptionINTRODUCTION 1
dc.descriptionTHEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 4
dc.descriptionConceptual Framework 4
dc.descriptionOral production 4
dc.descriptionExposition texts 5
dc.descriptionReading to learn 7
dc.descriptionUsing a R2L cycle adaptation to promote oral production 10
dc.descriptionFlipped instruction 12
dc.descriptionLiterature Review 14
dc.descriptionMETHODOLOGY 17
dc.descriptionType of Research 17
dc.descriptionResearch Questions 18
dc.descriptionContext and Participants 18
dc.descriptionData collection techniques 20
dc.descriptionData Analysis 23
dc.descriptionFINDINGS 25
dc.descriptionIdentifying Learners’ Actual Level of Performance 25
dc.descriptionText Genre Selection: Previous to the Design 30
dc.descriptionR2L and FL Unit Features 34
dc.descriptionCurriculum explanation and decisions for the unit design 36
dc.descriptionObjectives selected for the unit 38
dc.descriptionTeaching points in the unit 39
dc.descriptionUnit flipped learning features 39
dc.descriptionR2L Cycle in the Lesson Design 41
dc.descriptionLesson adaptations and activities proposed for meeting students language needs of exposition 41
dc.descriptionPreparing for Listening 45
dc.descriptionDetailed Listening 46
dc.descriptionJoint retelling 47
dc.descriptionJoint Construction 47
dc.descriptionIndependent construction 48
dc.descriptionAssessment within the R2L and FL Unit and Lesson 48
dc.descriptionDISCUSSION 51
dc.descriptionCONCLUSIONS 56
dc.descriptionREFERENCES 57
dc.descriptionAPPENDIX 67
dc.descriptionPregrado
dc.descriptionLicenciado(a) en Lenguas Extranjeras con Énfasis en Inglés
dc.formatApplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFacultad de Educación y Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisherLicenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con Énfasis en Inglés
dc.relationAcevedo, C. (2009). 2010: A report on school-based action research: Will the implementation of Reading to Learn in Stockholm schools accelerate literacy learning for disadvantaged students and close the achievement gap? Research report. Multilingual Research Institute.
dc.relationAcevedo, C., & Rose, D. (2007). Reading (and writing) to learn in the middle years of schooling. Occasional paper. Primary English Teaching Association.
dc.relationAlderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. A&C Black.
dc.relationAlderson, J. C., Harding, L., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317-336.
dc.relationAnaya, C., & Pastrana, J. (2019). Exploring the use of reading to learn (R2L) to promote speaking to 9th graders. (Bachelor thesis, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia).
dc.relationBahadorfar, M., & Omidvar, R. (2014). Technology in teaching speaking skill. Acme International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 9-13.
dc.relationBarwick, J. (1998). Targeting text: Upper level – Recount, procedure, exposition (Book 2). Blake Education.
dc.relationBecerra Posada, T., Díaz, L., García Montes, P., Herazo, J. D., & Sagre, A. (2019). Using Reading to Learn for EFL students’ reading of explanations. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz053
dc.relationBlecua, I., & Sánchez, C. (2017). Cambios de enseñanza-aprendizaje tras la implementación del modelo reading to learn/leer para Aprender en las aulas de educación secundaria de un centro bilingüe. Lenguaje y Textos, 46, 55-68. https://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.8724
dc.relationBerenguer-Albaladejo, C. (2016). Acerca de la utilidad del aula invertida o flipped classroom. In M. T. Torosa, & J. D. Álvarez (Eds.), XIV Jornadas de redes de investigación en docencia universitaria. Investigación, innovación y enseñanza universitaria: Enfoques pluridisciplinares (pp. 1466-1480). University of Alicante.
dc.relationBergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2013/2014). The flipped classroom. CSE, 17(3), 24-27.
dc.relationBlanco Fernández, J. M., & Rodríguez-Miñambres, P. (2017). Reading and writing across the curriculum: The reading to learn model. Lenguaje y Textos, 46, 81-87. http://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.8718
dc.relationBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27.
dc.relationBrookhart, S. M. (2018, April). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, p. 22.
dc.relationBrown, G., Gillian, B., Brown, G. D., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationBrummitt-Yale, J. (2017, June 11). What is diagnostic assessment? - Definition & Examples. Study.com. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-diagnostic-assessment-definition-examples.html
dc.relationByrne, D. (1991). Teaching oral English. Longman.
dc.relationBurns, A. (1990). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. Prospect, 5(3), 62-71.
dc.relationBurns, A. 1992/1993. Spoken discourse and power. Prospect, 8(1/2).61–76.
dc.relationBurns, A. (1998). Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 102-123.
dc.relationBurns, A. (2010). Teaching speaking using genre-based pedagogy. In M. Olafsson (Ed.), Symposium 2009. Genrer och funktionellt språk i teori och praktik (pp. 230-246). National Centre for Swedish as a Second Language, University of Stockholm.
dc.relationCallaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing (Report of the DSP literacy project, Metropolitan East Region). NSW Department of Education.
dc.relationCastillo, P., & Yanive, C. (2007). Improving eleventh graders’ oral production in English class through cooperative learning strategies. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 8, 75-90.
dc.relationCortés, A., & Rubiano, M. (2014). La escucha y la oralidad en el aprendizaje del inglés en niños de tercero de educación básica del colegio distrital Antonio José de Sucre (Bachelor thesis, Universidad Libre, Bogotá, Colombia). http://hdl.handle.net/10901/8215
dc.relationDamayanti, I. L. (2017). From storytelling to story writing: The implementation of reading to learn (R2L) pedagogy to teach English as a foreign language in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4870
dc.relationDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
dc.relationDerewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Heinemann Educational Books.
dc.relationDerewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202
dc.relationEggenschwiler, J., & Biggs, E. D. (2011). CliffsQuickReview writing: Grammar, usage, and style. Hungry Minds, Inc.
dc.relationEllis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220.
dc.relationEnfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
dc.relationGarcía Parejo, I., & Whittaker, R. (2017). Presentation: The reading to learn approach: Theory and practice in transnational educational settings. Lenguaje y textos, 46, 1-6. http://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.8710
dc.relationGibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. R. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (p. 38-56). Sage.
dc.relationHalliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective (2nd Ed.). Oxford University Press.
dc.relationHalliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education, 5(2), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
dc.relationHerazo, J. D. (2012). Using a genre-based approach to promote oral communication in the Colombian English classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2012.2.a07
dc.relationHerazo, J. D., Becerra, T., & García, P. (2019, July). Using R2L to enhance learners’ oral skills. Paper presented at the 15th Latin American Congress on Systemic Functional Linguistics (ALSFAL), Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Chile.
dc.relationJewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research. National Centre for Research Methods. Working paper 03/12, 1-25.
dc.relationKim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
dc.relationKoop, C., & Rose, D. (2008). Reading to learn in Murdi Paaki: Changing outcomes for indigenous students. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 16(1), 41.
dc.relationLana (2009, June 1st). Genre-based approach. Rich knowledge. http://lana-cometorich.blogspot.com/2009/06/genre-based-approach.html
dc.relationLock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationLövstedt, A. C., & Rose, D. (2010). Reading to learn maths: A teacher professional development project in Stockholm. Multilingual Research Institute. https://www.readingtolearn.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Reading-to-Learn-Maths-A-teacher-professional-development-project-in-Stockholm.pdf
dc.relationMartin, J. (2009). Realisation, instantiation and individuation: some thoughts on identity in youth justice conferencing. DELTA, 25, pp.549-583. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502009000300002
dc.relationMartin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2013). Pedagogic discourse: Contexts of schooling. In Nørgaard (Ed.), RASK International journal of language and communication (Special issue in honour of Carl Bache), 1-46.
dc.relationMgqwashu, E. M., & Makhathini, B. (2017). Transforming primary school teachers’ perceptions of the ‘place’ of teaching reading: The role of reading to learn methodology. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 30-49.
dc.relationMillard, E. (2012). 5 reasons why flipped classrooms work. University Business, 15(11), 26-29.
dc.relationMilman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning For Educators, Trainers, and Leaders, 9(3), 85-87.
dc.relationMinisterio de Educación Nacional, (2016). Suggested English Curriculum Structure: Grades 6th to 11th. Pedagogical guidelines document. https://aprende.colombiaaprende.edu.co/sites/default/files/naspublic/Anexo%2013%20Suggested%20Structure.pdf
dc.relationMyskow, G., & Gordon, K. (2010). A focus on purpose: Using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal, 64(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp057
dc.relationPeña, M., & Onatra, A. (2009). Promoting oral production through the task-based learning approach: A study in a public secondary school in Colombia. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 11(2), 11-26.
dc.relationRoehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12
dc.relationRose, D. (In press). Designing pedagogic registers: Reading to learn. In D. Caldwell, J. Knox & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Developing Theory: A handbook in appliable linguistics and semiotics (xx-xx). Bloomsbury.
dc.relationRose, D., & Acevedo, C. (2006). Closing the gap and accelerating learning in the middle years of schooling. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 14(2), 32-45.
dc.relationRose, D. (2005). Democratising the classroom: A literacy pedagogy for the new generation. Journal of Education, 37, 127‐164.
dc.relationRose, D. (2008). Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 151-166). SAGE publications Ltd.
dc.relationRose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.
dc.relationRose, D. (2015). New developments in genre-based literacy pedagogy. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd Ed.) (pp. 227-242). The Guilford Press.
dc.relationRose, D., & Acevedo, C. (2017). Learning to write, reading to learn: Background and development of genre-based literacy improvement projects in Australia. Lenguaje y Textos, 46, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.8688
dc.relationSandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative health research, 14(10), 1366-1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269672
dc.relationThakare, R. (2018, July 25). 8 types of flipped learning classrooms and tools to build them. ELearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/flipped-learning-classrooms-tools-build-types
dc.relationTucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
dc.relationUNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2018). UNESCO eAtlas of literacy. https://tellmaps.com/uis/literacy/?subject=-601865091&lang=en
dc.relationWebb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., and Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Rand McNally.
dc.relationWiddowson, H. G. (1984). Educational and pedagogic factors in syllabus design. In C.J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 23-27). Pergamon Press.
dc.relationLiu, Y. (2013). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 8(4), 387-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2013.827849
dc.rightsCopyright Universidad de Córdoba, 2019
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsInfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.subjectDiseño pedagógico
dc.subjectLeer para aprender
dc.subjectPedagogía de Géneros
dc.subjectAula invertida
dc.subjectTextos Argumentativos
dc.subjectProducción Oral
dc.subjectUnit and Lesson design
dc.subjectReading to Learn
dc.subjectGenre-based pedagogy
dc.subjectFlipped instruction
dc.subjectOral exposition texts
dc.titleThe design of an instructional unit and lesson intended to flip the r2l class to engage tenth-graders in oral exposition texts
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregrado
dc.typeInfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.typeInfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeText
dc.typehttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TP
dc.coverageMontería, Córdoba


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución