La enseñanza centrada en resolución de problemas pone en marcha estrategias metacognitivas en a formación del estudiante de ingeniería

dc.contributorGrupo de Investigación Ecitrónica
dc.creatorPaz Penagos, Hernán
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T20:14:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T21:17:31Z
dc.date.available2023-05-12T20:14:44Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T21:17:31Z
dc.date.created2023-05-12T20:14:44Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier0120-341X
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/2326
dc.identifierhttps://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/revista-universidad-eafit/article/view/725
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8707339
dc.description.abstractCuando se trata de resolver problemas en ingeniería, las actividades académicas realizadas por los estudiantes y orientadas por el profesor enfatizan en las estrategias cognitivas y en los procedimientos necesarios para su resolución correcta. Sin embargo, falta propiciar el acercamiento al conocimiento de las habilidades de aprendizaje propias del estudiante (metacognición), de tal manera que se favorezcan el autoconocimiento y el desarrollo de la capacidad de valoración y control de las propias aptitudes y limitaciones a la hora de orientar su aprendizaje. El artículo identifica los rasgos metacognitivos que propician en los alumnos las tendencias sobre resolución de problemas (RP) en la enseñanza y evaluación de la ingeniería.
dc.description.abstractWhen solving engineering problems, teacher oriented academic activities done by the students are centered in cognitive strategies and the necessary procedures for their correct solving. However, it's also necessary to encourage an approach to a knowledge of the student's learning abilities (meta-cognition) in such a manner that auto-knowledge, assessment capability and aptitude and limitation control are nourished during learning orientation. The paper identifies the meta-cognitive characteristics that encourage problem solving (RP) tendencies in the students subject to engineering teaching and assessment.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherColombia
dc.relation54
dc.relation157
dc.relation40
dc.relation46
dc.relationN/A
dc.relationRevista Universidad EAFIT
dc.relationAbet. (2005). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. El línea: http://www.abet.org/, consultado el 19 de octubre del 2009.
dc.relationAlonso Tapia, J. y N. Carriedo. (1996). “Problemas de comprensión lectora: evaluación e intervención”, C. Monereo e I. Solé (Coord.): El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: una perspectiva profesional y constructivista. Madrid: Alianza Psicología, pp. 32-65.
dc.relationBabbs, P. J. & A. J. Moe. (1983). “Metacognition: a key for independent learning from text”, The Reading Teacher, 36. International Reading Association, pp. 422 - 426.
dc.relationBaker, L. (1991). “Metacognition, reading, and science education”, C. Santa y D. Alvermann (Ed.): Science learning: Processes and applications. Newark, DE: I.R.A., pp. 67-92.
dc.relationBarberá, E. y C. Gómez-Granell. (1996). “Las estrategias de enseñanza y evaluación en matemática”, C. Monereo e I. Solé (Coord.): El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: una perspectiva profesional y constructivista. Madrid: Alianza Psicología, pp. 15-39.
dc.relationBarbey, A. K. & L. W. Barsalou. (2009). “Reasoning and problem solving models”, L. R. Squire (Ed.): Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. La Jolla (CA): Elsevier Science, pp. 35-43.
dc.relationBasoredo, C. (2009). “¿Cómo formular objetivos para el aprendizaje y el desarrollo de competencias?”, Quaderns Digitals, 58. Bilbao: IVAP, pp. 43-54.
dc.relationBelland, B.; French, B. & Ertmer, P. (2009). “Validity and problem-based learning research: a review of instruments used to assess intended learning outcomes”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). Utah, pp. 59-89.
dc.relationBoekaerts, M. (1996). “Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation”, European Psychologist,1(2). 1 Leiden University The Netherlands, pp. 100-112.
dc.relationBorkowski, J. G. (1992). “Metacognitive theory: a framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4). University of Notre Dame, pp. 253-257.
dc.relationBorkowski, J. G. y L. A. Turner. (1990). « Tran situational characteristics of metacognition”, W. Schneider y F. E. Weinert (Ed.): Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance. New York: SpringerVerlag, pp. 78-89.
dc.relationBower, K. C.; Ways, T. W. & Miller C. M. (2004). “Small group, self-directed problem based learning development in a traditional engineering program”, Frontiers in Education 3(34th Annual). Charleston, SC, USA, S1B/16- S1B/21.
dc.relationBrown, A. L. (1987). “Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms”, F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Ed.): Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relationBurón, J. (1996). Enseñar a aprender: Introducción a la metacognición. Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero.
dc.relationCamps, A. y M. Castelló. (1996). “Las estrategias de enseñanza-aprendizaje en la escritura”, C. Monereo e I. Solé (Coord.), El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: una perspectiva profesional y constructivista, Madrid: Alianza Psicología, pp. 120-122.
dc.relationCarrasco, J. B. (1997). Hacia una enseñanza eficaz. Madrid: Rialp.
dc.relationChrysikou, E. G. (2006). “When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32(4), pp. 935-942.
dc.relationDe Schutter, A. (1981). Investigación participativa. Una opción metodológica para la educación de adultos. Pátzcuaro, México: CREFAL.
dc.relationDuell, O. K. (1986). “Metacognitive skills”, G. D. Phye & T. Andre (Ed.): Cognitive classroom learning: understanding, thinking and problem solving. New York: Academic Press, pp. 98- 108.
dc.relationFerreiro, G. R. y E. M. Calderón. (2000). El ABC del aprendizaje cooperativo: trabajo en equipo para enseñar y aprender. México: Trillas.
dc.relationFitzpatrick, C. (2008). “A problem based learning (PBL) module on electronics & the environment”,Electronics and the Environment. Limerick, Univ., Limerick, pp. 1-6.
dc.relationFlavell, J. H. (1976). “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry”, American Psychologist, 34. American Psychologist, pp. 906-911.
dc.relationFlavell, J. H. & H. M. Wellman. (1977). “Metamemory”, R. V. Kail Jr. & W. Hagen (Ed.): Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relationFurmanski, J.; Kane, S. R.; Gupta, S. & Pruitt, L. A. (2006). “Problem-based learning and assessment of competence in an engineering biomaterials course”, Frontiers in education: FIE, 21-22.
dc.relationGarcía, T. & P. R. Pintich. (1994). “Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: the role of self-schemas and selfregulatory strategies”, D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Ed.): Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, pp. 67-78.
dc.relationGonzález, J. L. & J. E. Loya-Hernández, J. E. (2007). “Project-based learning of reconfigurable high-density digital systems design: An interdisciplinary context based approach”, Frontiers in education: FIE, S1C-1-S1C-6.
dc.relationGonzález-Pienda, J. A.; Núñez, J. C.; GonzálezPumariega, S. y García, M. (1997). “Autoconcepto, autoestima y aprendizaje escolar”, Psicothema, 9(2). Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo (España), pp. 271-289.
dc.relationGorodetsky, M. & R. Klavir. (2003). “What can we learn from how gifted/average pupils describe their processes of problem solving?”, Learning and Instruction, 13. Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel, pp. 305-325
dc.relationGreenfield, L. B. (1979). “Student Problem Solving”, Engineering Education. College of Engineering, pp. 709-712
dc.relationHatton, M. (1967). “Developing an Engineering Problem Solving Strategy”, Engineering Education. New York, pp. 148-156.
dc.relationJohnson, D. W. & R. T. Johnson. (1987). “Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation”, Educational Leadership, 45(3). ¿Ciudad o editorial?, pp. 71-80.
dc.relationJonassen, D. (2000). “Toward a design theory of problem solving”, Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4). Universidad de Pensilvannia, pp. 63-85.
dc.relationJonassen, D. & Tessmer, M. (1996). “An outcomesbased taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation and research”, Training Research Journal, 2. Virginia, Estados Unidos, pp. 11-46.
dc.relationJorba, J. y N. Sanmartí. (1994). Enseñar, aprender y evaluar: un proceso de evaluación continua. Propuesta didáctica para las áreas de Ciencias de la Naturaleza y Matemáticas. Madrid: MEC.
dc.relationJuing-Huei, S.; Shun-Chung, W.; Chyi-Shyong, L. & Jiann-Jong, Ch. (2007). “Enhanced problembased learning of power converter theories and implementations with behavior model simulations”, Frontiers in education: FIE, T2C13-T2C-18.
dc.relationKnowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning. Chicago, Estados Unidos: Association Press.
dc.relationLacasa, P. y P. Herranz. (1995). Aprendiendo a aprender: resolver problemas entre iguales. Madrid: M.E.C. (CIDE)
dc.relationLaforcade, P.; Barbier, F.; Sallaberry, C. & Nodenot, T. (2003). “Profiling cooperative problem based learning situations”, The Second IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics. LIUPPA, Pau Univ., France , pp. 32-38.
dc.relationLeake, D. B. (2001). “Problem solving and reasoning: case based”, N. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavoiral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 12117-12120.
dc.relationLiztinger, T.; Wise, J. & Lee, S. (2005). “Selfdirected learning readiness among engineering undergraduate students”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 2, Number 94. The Pennsylvania State University, pp. 215- 222.
dc.relationMantri, A.; Dutt, S.; Gupta, J. P. & Chitkara, M. (2008). “Design and Evaluation of a PBLBased Course in Analog Electronics”, IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(4), Institute of Engineering and Technology (CIET), Punjab, India, pp. 432-438.
dc.relationMatthews, B. (2004). “The effects of direct and problem-based learning instruction in an undergraduate introductory engineering graphics course”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University.
dc.relationMayer, R. E. (1986). Pensamiento, resolución de problemas y cognición. Madrid, España: Paidós.
dc.relationMayor, J.; Suengas, A. y González, J. (1993). Estrategias metacognitivas. Aprender a aprender y aprender a pensar. Madrid: Síntesis Psicología.
dc.relationMcCombs, B. L. (1988). “Motivational skills training: combining metacognitive, cognitive, and affective learning strategies”, C. E. Weinstein; E. T. Goetz & P. A. Alexander (Ed.): Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation. New York: Academic Press, pp. 141-169.
dc.relationMiller, R. B.; Behrens, J. T. & Greene, B. A. (1993). “Goals and perceived ability: impact on student valuing, self-regulation and persistence”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18. University Oklahoma, pp. 2-14.
dc.relationMotschnig, R. & K. Figl. (2007). “Developing team competence as part of a person centered learning course on communication and soft skills in project management”, Frontiers in education: FIE, F2G-15-F2G-21.
dc.relationNickerson, R. S.; Perkins, D. N. y Smith, E. E. (1990). Enseñar a pensar. Aspectos de la actitud intelectual. Barcelona: Paidós.
dc.relationOzuah, P.; Curtis, J. y Stein, R. (2001). “Impact of problem-based learning on residents' Selfdirected Learning”, Pediatric Medical School, 155. New York, pp. 669-672.
dc.relationPáramo, P. y G. Otálvaro. (2006). “Investigación alternativa: por una distinción entre posturas epistemológicas y no entre métodos”, Moebios, 25, http://www.moebio.uchile.cl/25/paramo.htm. (11 de mayo de 2009).
dc.relationPintrich, P. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
dc.relationPonton, M.; Carr, P. y Derrick, G. (2004). “A path analysis of the conative factors associated with autonomous learning”, International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 1(1). SAGE Publications, pp. 59-69.
dc.relationPozo, J. I. y M. A. Gómez. (1996). “El asesoramiento curricular en Ciencias de la Naturaleza”, C. Monereo e I. Solé (Coord.): El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: una perspectiva profesional y constructivista. Madrid: Alianza Psicología, pp. 365-381.
dc.relationPozo, J. I. y Y. Postigo. (1994). “La solución de problemas como contenido procedimental de la educación obligatoria”, J. I. Pozo; M. P. Pérez; J. Domínguez y Y. Postigo: La solución de problemas. Madrid: Santillana, pp. 180- 212.
dc.relationRamos, C. A.; Ramírez, J. M. & Franco, E. (2005). “Platform for virtual problem-based learning in control engineering education”, 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2005 and 2005 European control conference. Sevilla, España, pp. 3432-3437.
dc.relationReisslein, M.; Tylavsky, D.; Matar, B.; Seeling, P. & Reisslein, J. (2007). “Active and cooperative learning in a freshman digital design course: impact on persistence in engineering and student motivational orientation”, Frontiers in education: FIE, S4A-1-S4A-6.
dc.relationResnick, L. (1999). La educación y el aprendizaje del pensamiento. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Aique.
dc.relationRogofff, B. (1993). Aprendices del pensamiento. El desarrollo cognitivo en el contexto social. Barcelona: Paidós.
dc.relationSauren, A. & M. Van Genderen. (2002). “Problembased learning at the Eindhoven/Maastricht BME program”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society. Proceedings of the Second Joint, (3). Eindhoven/Maastricht, pp. 65-66.
dc.relationSchoenfeld, A. (1992). “Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics”, Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan, pp. 32-45.
dc.relationSchraw, G. (1994). “The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19. School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Israel, pp. 143-154.
dc.relationSimon, H. A. (2001). “Psychology of problem solving and reasoning”, N. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavoiral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 12120-12123.
dc.relationStrobel, J. & A. van Barneveld. (2009). “When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of metaanalyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problembased Learning, 3(1). Pennsylvania, 44-58.
dc.relationTuning América Latina (2007). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la educación superior en América Latina. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
dc.relationVanLehn, K. (1998). “Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving”, Cognitive Science, 22(3), pp. 347-388.
dc.relationWalker, A. & H. Leary. (2009). “A problem based learning metaanalysis: differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). Utah State University, pp. 12- 43.
dc.relationWhite, R. T. & I. J. Mitchell. (1994). “Metacognition and the quality of learning”, Studies in sciences education, 23. Pensylvania, pp. 21-37
dc.relationXavier, F.; López, A. M. & Rosado, L. (2001). “Cognitive and metacognitive model in electronics engineering teaching”, 31th ASEE/ IEEE frontiers in education conference, Reno, 10-13 October.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. (1994). “Dimensions of academic self-regulation: a conceptual framework for education”, Review of Educational Research, 6(1). New York, pp. 88-131.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J.; Bandura, A. y Martínez-Pons, M. (1992). “Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting”, American Educational Research Journal, 29. New York, pp. 663-76.
dc.relationZimmerman, B. J.; Bonner, S. & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners. Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, D.C.: APA.
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.sourcehttps://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/revista-universidad-eafit/article/view/725
dc.titleLa enseñanza centrada en resolución de problemas pone en marcha estrategias metacognitivas en a formación del estudiante de ingeniería
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución