dc.creator | Zazueta-Gutiérrez, Citlaly | |
dc.creator | Portillo-Loera, Jesús José | |
dc.creator | Castro-Pérez, Beatriz Isabel | |
dc.creator | Estrada-Angulo, Alfredo | |
dc.creator | Urías-Estrada, Jesús David | |
dc.creator | Ríos-Rincón, Francisco Gerardo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-29 05:46:57 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-30T09:30:42Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-06T21:12:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-29 05:46:57 | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-30T09:30:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-06T21:12:43Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-29 05:46:57 | |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-30T09:30:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-29 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.unisucre.edu.co/handle/001/1719 | |
dc.identifier | 10.24188/recia.v15.n1.2023.973 | |
dc.identifier | 2027-4297 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n1.2023.973 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8706897 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objetivo: Valorar la respuesta conductual diurna de bovinos productores de carne en finalización intensiva en el trópico seco. Materiales y Métodos: En el otoño se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo con duración de seis semanas. A las 8:00, 12:00 y 16:00 h se registraron las pautas conductuales, temperatura ambiente y humedad relativa; el índice de temperatura y humedad fue calculado. Los bovinos se alojaron en corrales provistos de sombra de polipropileno y corrales sin sombra. Resultados: A las 8:00 h todos los bovinos estuvieron sujetos a condiciones ambientales de confort térmico (p<0.01); pero a las 12:00 h los bovinos bajo sombra estuvieron en peligro térmico y a las 16:00 h en alerta térmica, y a las 12:00 y 16:00 h en los bovinos sin acceso a sombra persistió el peligro térmico (p<0.01). El acceso al comedero se inhibió a las 8:00 y 12:00 h e incrementó a las 16:00 h, pero la rumia disminuyó a las 8:00 y 16:00 y aumentó a las 12:00 h (p<0.01). Los indicadores de descanso son mayormente observados en peligro y alerta térmica (p<0.01). Los indicadores agonistas se encuentran inhibidos a las 8:00 y 12:00 h (p≤0.04). La conducta social es mayormente manifiesta a las 16:00 h (p<0.001). Conclusiones: La expresión diurna de la conducta bovina relacionada con el factor climático y la provisión de sombra, puede ser inhibida en las horas de más alta influencia calórica expresada en el índice de temperatura y humedad. | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To assess the diurnal behavioral response of beef cattle in feedlot in the dry tropics. Materials and Methods: During fall, a prospective observational study was carried out for six weeks long. At 8:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h, behavioral patterns, temperature and relative humidity were recorded, and the temperature and humidity index was calculated. Cattle were housed in pens provided with polypropylene shade and pens without shade. Results: At 8:00 h, the cattle under shade and cattle without access to shade were subjected to environmental conditions of thermal comfort category (p<0.01); but at 12:00 h cattle under shade were in thermal danger and thermal alert at 16:00 h. For cattle without access to shade at 12:00 and 16:00 h, the thermal danger persisted (p<0.01). Feed access was inhibited at 8:00 and 12:00 h and increased at 16:00 h, but rumination decreased at 8:00 and 16:00 h and increased at 12:00 h (p<0.01). Rest indicators were mostly observed in danger and thermal alert (p<0.01). The agonist indicators were inhibited at 8:00 and 12:00 h (p≤0.04). Social behavior was mostly manifest at 4:00 p.m. (p<0.001). Conclusions: The diurnal expression of bovine behavior related to the climatic factor and the provision of shade, can be inhibited in the hours of highest caloric load expressed as the Temperature and Humidity Index.
Key words: animal behaviour, animal welfare, warm season, animal housing, thermal stress, Bos indicus (AGROVOC Multilingual Thesaurus) | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Sucre | |
dc.relation | 1 Miranda de la Lama GC. 2013. Transporte y logística pre-sacrificio: principios y tendencias en bienestar animal y su relación con la calidad de la carne. Vet Mex 2013. 44(1):31-56. ISSN: 0301-509. http://veterinariamexico.unam.mx/index.php/vet/article/view/328 | |
dc.relation | 2 Mota-Rojas D, Velarde A, Huertas CS, Cajiao-Pachon MN. Bienestar animal, una visión global en Iberoamérica. Tercera edición. Barcelona, España: Editorial ELSEIVER-SPAIN. 2019. ISBN: 978-84-9113-026-0. 3 Schneider L, Kemper N, Spindler B. Stereotypic behavior in fattening bulls. Animals. 2019. 10(1):40 https://doi:10.3390/ani10010040 | |
dc.relation | 4 Romo-Valdez A, Pérez-Linares C, Figueroa-Saavedra F, Portillo-Loera J, Ríos-Rincón F. Behavioral response of beef cattle in feedlot in warm desert environment. Abanico Vet. 2019. 9:1-18 https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2019.928 | |
dc.relation | 5 Brody S. 2013. Circadian Rhythms. In Brenner´s Encyclopedia of Genetics (Second Edition). Disponible en: www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/circadian-rhythm. | |
dc.relation | 6 Robert BD, White BJ, Renter DG, Larson RL. 2011. Determination of lying behavior patterns in healthy beef cattle by use of wireless accelerometers. Am J Vet Res. 2011. 72(4): 467-473. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.72.4.467 | |
dc.relation | 7 Grandin T. Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens. Vet Anim Sci 2016. 1-2:23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2016.11.001 | |
dc.relation | 8 Macitelli F, Braga JS, Gellatly D, da Costa MP. Reduced space in outdoor feedlot impacts beef cattle welfare. Animal. 2020. 14:2588-2597. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120001652 | |
dc.relation | 9 Wagner N, Mialon MM, Sloth KH, Lardy R, Ledoux D, Silberberg M, et al Detection of changes in the circadian rhythm of cattle in relation to disease, stress, and reproductive events. Methods. 2021. 186: 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.09.003 | |
dc.relation | 10 Li H, Li K, Zhang K, Li Y, Gu H, Liu H, et al The Circadian Physiology: Implications in Livestock Health. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. 22(4): 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042111 | |
dc.relation | 11 Manterola C, Otzen T. Estudios observacionales. Los diseños utilizados con mayor frecuencia en investigación clínica. Int J Morphol. 2014. 32(2):634-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022014000200042 | |
dc.relation | 12 García E. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México. 2004; ISBN: 970-32-1010-4. 13 Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2006 84(3):712-719. https://doi:10.2527/2006.843712x | |
dc.relation | 14 Marti S, Devant M, Amatayakul-Chantler S, Jackson JA, Lopez E, Janzen ED, et al Effect of anti-gonadotropin-releasing factor vaccine and band castration on indicators of welfare in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2015 93(4):1581–1591. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8346 | |
dc.relation | 15 SADER-SENASICA. Manual de Buenas Prácticas en la Producción de Carne de Ganado Bovino en Confinamiento. 2014. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/454442/manual_de_BPP-BOV-CONFINAMIENTO.pdf | |
dc.relation | 16 Daniel WW. Bioestadística. Bases para el análisis de las ciencias de la salud. 2002. 3ra. Edición. Editorial LIMUSA SA de CV. México, D.F. ISBN 968-18-0178-4 17 SAS Institute. Statistical Analysis Software. https://www.sas.com/es_mx/software/on-demand-for-academics.html | |
dc.relation | 18 Renaudeau D, Collin A, Yahav S, Basilio V, Gourdine JL, Collier RJ. 2012. Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal. 2012. 6(5):707-728. ISSN: 1751-7311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002448 | |
dc.relation | 19 Brown-Brandl TM. Understanding heat stress in beef cattle. Braz J Anim Sci 2018. 47: e20160414 https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720160414. | |
dc.relation | 20 Arndt SS, Goerlich VC, van der Staay FJ. A dynamic concept of animal welfare: The role of appetitive and adverse internal and external factors and the animal’s ability to adapt to them. Front Anim Sci 2022. 3:908513 https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.908513 | |
dc.relation | 21 Beretta V, Simeone A, Bentancur O. Manejo de la sombra asociado a la restricción del pastoreo: efecto sobre el comportamiento y performance estival de vacunos. Agrociencia Uruguay. 2013. 17(1):131-140. http://www.fagro.edu.uy/agrociencia/index.php/directorio/article/view/766 | |
dc.relation | 22 Beatty DT, Barnes A, Taylor E, Pethick D, McCarthy DM. Maloney SK. Physiological responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle to prolonged, continuous heat and humidity. J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84(4):972–985. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844972x | |
dc.relation | 23 Dawkins MS. Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology (Jena). 2003;106(4):383-387. https://doi:10.1078/0944-2006-00122 | |
dc.relation | 24 Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Eigenberg RA, Mader TL, Morrow JL, Dailey JW. Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds. Livest. Sci. 2006. 105 (1):19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.012 | |
dc.relation | 25 Valente ÉEL, Chizzotti ML, Ribeiro OCV, Castlho GM, Domingues SS, Castro RA, et al Intake, physiological parameters and behavior of Angus and Nellore bulls subjected to heat stress. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina. 2015. 36(6):4565-4574. https://doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4565 | |
dc.relation | 26 Salvin HE, Lees AM, Café LM, Colditz IG, Lee C. Welfare of beef cattle in Australian feedlots: a review of the risks and measures. Anim Prod Sci 2020. 60:1569–1590. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19621 | |
dc.relation | 27 Lagos GH, González FJ, Castillo FR. Paquete tecnológico para la engorda de ganado bovino en corral. 2014. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/23143240/PAQUETE_TECNOLOGICO_PARA_LA_ENGORDA_DE_GANADO_BOVINO_EN_CORRAL | |
dc.relation | 28 Macitelli F, Braga JS, Gellatly D, da Costa MP. Reduced space in outdoor feedlot impacts beef cattle welfare. Animal. 2020. 14(12):2588-2597. 29 Park RM, Foster M, Daigle CL. A scoping review: the impact of housing systems and environmental features on beef cattle welfare. Animals. 2020. 10:565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040565 | |
dc.relation | 30 Lees AM, Sejian V, Wallage AL, Steel CC, Mader TL, Lees JC, et al The impact of heat load on cattle. Animals. 2019. 9(6): 322. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fani9060322 | |
dc.relation | https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/973/1048 | |
dc.relation | https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/973/1049 | |
dc.relation | https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/973/1050 | |
dc.relation | Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : RECIA 15(1):ENERO-JUNIO 2023 | |
dc.relation | e973 | |
dc.relation | 1 | |
dc.relation | e973 | |
dc.relation | 15 | |
dc.relation | Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights | Citlaly Zazueta-Gutiérrez, Jesús José Portillo-Loera, Beatriz Isabel Castro-Pérez, Alfredo Estrada-Angulo, Jesús David Urías-Estrada, Francisco Gerardo Ríos-Rincón - 2023 | |
dc.source | https://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/973 | |
dc.subject | Animal behaviour | |
dc.subject | animal welfare | |
dc.subject | warm season | |
dc.subject | animal housing | |
dc.subject | thermal stress | |
dc.subject | Bos indicus | |
dc.subject | Conducta animal | |
dc.subject | bienestar animal | |
dc.subject | facilidades de alojamiento | |
dc.subject | clima cálido | |
dc.subject | estrés por calor | |
dc.subject | Bos indicus | |
dc.title | Respuesta conductual diurna de bovinos productores de carne en finalización intensiva en el trópico seco | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |