Architecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape

dc.creatorPombo, Fátima .
dc.date2015-10-14 00:00:00
dc.date2015-10-14 00:00:00
dc.date2015-10-14
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T18:15:24Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T18:15:24Z
dc.identifier1794-7111
dc.identifierhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
dc.identifier2462-8115
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8694230
dc.descriptionAbstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ and ‘inside’. The theoretical framework we rely upon in this issue is Phenomenology, namely based on Merleau-Ponty‘s approach to perception (Phénoménologie de la Perception [The Phenomenology of Perception], L’Oeil et l’Esprit [Eye and Mind], Le Visible et l’Invisible [The Visible and the Invisible]), and the phenomenological understanding of architecture (through Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor, Juhani Pallasmaa, David Seamon). Within this scope, we debate to what extent Merleau-Ponty’s L’Entre-deux (In-Between), and subsequent ontology of the sensible, deals with landscape as a category towards the constitution of a subjective experience of space and time. The ‘outside’ is not the world exercising the ego possibilities, but the primordial experience involving the individual and the world. Iconic examples as the Fallingwater House (Frank Lloyd Wright), the Glass House (Lina Bo Bardi), and the Farnsworth House (Mies van der Rohe) are employed to interpret landscape’s contribution towards the understanding of a descriptive ontology of the visible-invisible, and to unfold the meaning of Chiasmus.
dc.descriptionAbstract Focusing on the presence of Nature, regardless of scale or dimension (a park, a small garden, or a tree), and regarding the individual inhabiting a house or a room, his dwelling, we intend to discuss how landscape implies in architecture the assumption of space as simultaneously ‘outside’ and ‘inside’. The theoretical framework we rely upon in this issue is Phenomenology, namely based on Merleau-Ponty‘s approach to perception (Phénoménologie de la Perception [The Phenomenology of Perception], L’Oeil et l’Esprit [Eye and Mind], Le Visible et l’Invisible [The Visible and the Invisible]), and the phenomenological understanding of architecture (through Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor, Juhani Pallasmaa, David Seamon). Within this scope, we debate to what extent Merleau-Ponty’s L’Entre-deux (In-Between), and subsequent ontology of the sensible, deals with landscape as a category towards the constitution of a subjective experience of space and time. The ‘outside’ is not the world exercising the ego possibilities, but the primordial experience involving the individual and the world. Iconic examples as the Fallingwater House (Frank Lloyd Wright), the Glass House (Lina Bo Bardi), and the Farnsworth House (Mies van der Rohe) are employed to interpret landscape’s contribution towards the understanding of a descriptive ontology of the visible-invisible, and to unfold the meaning of Chiasmus.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruniversidad de Caldas
dc.relation198
dc.relation9
dc.relation183
dc.relation10
dc.relationKepes
dc.relationBenediktsson, K. & Lund, Katrín A. (Eds.). (2010). Conversations with Landscape,Surrey and Burlington. Ashgate Publishing.
dc.relationBo B., Lina & Carvalho Feraz, M. Casa de Vidro/The Glass House. Unpaged.
dc.relationCaruso, A. (2008). The feeling of things. Barcelona: Ediciones Polígrafa.
dc.relationDeleuze, Giles & Parnet, Claire. (1996). Dialogues. Paris: Flammarion.
dc.relationEdensor, T. (2010). “Aurora landscapes: affective atmospheres of light and dark”. In: Karl Benediktsson and Katrín Anna Lund (Eds.). Conversations with Landscape.Farnham: Ashgate.
dc.relationGuedes, J. (1992). “Lembranças de Lina Bo Bardi”. In: Revista Caramelo, No. 4. São Paulo.
dc.relationHoll, S. et al. (2008). Questions of perception. Phenomenology of Architecture.San Francisco: William Stout San Francisco: William Stout Publishers.
dc.relationMerleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relation________. (1964). L’Oeil et l’Esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relation________. (1988). Le Visible et l’Invisible. Paris:Gallimard.
dc.relationPallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin. Architecture and the senses. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.relationReed, C. (Ed.). (1996). Not at Home. The suppression of domesticity in modern Art and Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.
dc.relationVon Fennig Wrobleski, D. (2009). “A little house in the country. The farnsworth house”. In: The Chicago Literary Club, February 23.
dc.relationZumthor, P. (2010a). Atmospheres: architectural environments, surrounding objects. Basel: Birkhäuser.
dc.relation_______ (2010b). Thinking architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
dc.relationNúm. 9 , Año 10 : Enero - Diciembre 2013
dc.relationhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/511/436
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2015 Revista Kepes
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/511
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.subjectChiasmus
dc.subjectinvisible – visible
dc.subjectlandscape
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.subjectChiasmus
dc.subjectinvisible – visible
dc.subjectlandscape.
dc.titleArchitecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
dc.titleArchitecture and Chiasmus. The resonance of landscape
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeSección Artículos
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución