Una aproximación bioética a la mejora cognitiva en individuos sanos: “Más no es mejor”;
Uma aproximação bioética para a melhoria cognitiva em indivíduos saudáveis: "Mais não é melhor"

dc.creatorPiedra Alegría, Jonathan
dc.date2020-05-28
dc.date2023-03-22T19:06:30Z
dc.date2023-03-22T19:06:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T18:02:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T18:02:00Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/4292
dc.identifier10.18359/rlbi.4292
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/43411
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8693915
dc.descriptionThe discussion on human enhancement is one of the topics that has gained more relevance in the current bioethical debates. In this article we will approach this concept, specifically in relation to the cognitive enhancement. In order to create a reflexive ethical framework, we will approach the subject from different points of view. Firstly, how cognitive improvement is understood based on two different aspects: the enhancement purpose and the enhancing activity itself. Subsequently, the scope of cognitive enhancement will be approached from the perspective of scientific research on the subject. On the second part of this paper we will analyze (based on the metanalysis of a selection of technical-empirical research papers) whether there is an actual enhancement and, if there is, what kind of enhancement is it. Finally, we will carry out a reflection around the moral problems represented by cognitive enhancement, to briefly conclude that this kind of enhancement occurs in a very limited manner while being justified from a reductionist framework of cognition and therefore of the human being.
dc.descriptionLa discusión sobre el human enhancement es uno de los temas que ha tomado más relevancia dentro de los debates bioéticos actuales. En este artículo realizaremos un abordaje sobre este concepto, específicamente en relación al tema de la mejora cognitiva. Con la idea de crear un marco ético reflexivo, abordaremos el tema desde varias vertientes. En primer lugar, cómo se entiende la mejora cognitiva, a partir de dos aspectos distintos: la finalidad de la mejora y la acción mejoradora en sí misma. Posteriormente, se enfocarán los alcances de la mejora cognitiva desde la óptica de las investigaciones científicas sobre el tema. En la segunda parte del texto, analizaremos (a partir del meta-análisis de una selección de investigaciones científico-empíricas) el tema de si realmente se presenta una mejora y, de ser así, de qué clase de mejora se trata. Para finalizar, realizaremos una reflexión en torno a los problemas morales que presenta la mejora cognitiva, para concluir brevemente que este tipo de mejora solo se presenta en un sentido muy limitado, al tiempo que se encuentra justificada por un marco reduccionista de la cognición y, por lo tanto, del ser humano mismo.
dc.descriptionA discussão sobre o human enhancement é um dos tópicos que ganhou maior relevância nos atuais debates bioéticos. Neste artigo, abordaremos esse conceito, especificamente em relação à questão da melhoria cognitiva. Com a ideia de criar um marco ético reflexivo, abordaremos a questão sob vários aspectos. Primeiro, como a melhoria cognitiva é entendida, com base em dois aspectos diferentes: a finalidade da melhoria e a própria ação de melhoria. Posteriormente, o alcance da melhoria cognitiva será focado na perspectiva das pesquisas científicas sobre essa temática. Na segunda parte do texto, analisaremos (a partir da meta-análise de uma seleção de pesquisas científico-empíricas) a questão de saber se uma melhoria é realmente apresentada e, em caso afirmativo, de que tipo de melhoria se trata. Finalmente, realizaremos uma reflexão sobre os problemas morais apresentados pela melhoria cognitiva, concluindo brevemente que esse tipo de melhoria ocorre apenas em um sentido muito limitado, sendo justificado por um marco reducionista da cognição e, portanto, do próprio ser humano.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/xml
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granada
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/4292/3829
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/4292/4006
dc.relation/*ref*/Sandel M. Contra la perfección. Barcelona: Marbot; 2007.
dc.relation/*ref*/Postigo Solana E. Naturaleza humana y problemas bioéticos del transhumanismo y el mejoramiento humano. En Cortina A y Serra MA, coords. Humanidad infinita. Desafíos éticos de las tecnologías emergentes. Madrid: Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias; 2016. pp. 233-256.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kass L. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of human improvement. President's Council on Bioethics, Washington, Dc (www. Bioethics. Gov). 2003, 16.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of The Biotechnology Revolution, Nueva York: Farrar Straus & Giroux; 2002.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wagner de Reyna A. El pensamiento ético de Nicolai Hartmann. Edit. Universitaria: Santiago; 1949.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bostrom N. Why I want to be a Posthuman when I grow up. Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. 2006; 1: 107-137. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8852-0_8
dc.relation/*ref*/Sandberg A, Bostrom N. Converging Cognitive Enhancements. Acad Sci. 2006; 1093: 201-227. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1382.015
dc.relation/*ref*/Savulescu J. ¿Decisiones peligrosas? Una bioética desafiante. Madrid: Tecnos; 2012.
dc.relation/*ref*/Miah A. Cuestiones éticas derivadas del mejoramiento humano. En Valores y Ética para el siglo XXI, 1a Ed. BBVA; 2011. P.177-207.
dc.relation/*ref*/Saniotis A. Remaking Homo: Ethical Issues on Future Human Enhancement. Ethics in Science. 2013; 13: 15-21. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00131
dc.relation/*ref*/Winkelman M. Alternative and traditional medicine approaches for substance abuse programs: a shamanic approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2001; 12: 337-351. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00100-1
dc.relation/*ref*/Winkelman M. Shamanism as the original neurotheology. Zygon. 2004; 39: 193-217. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.00566.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Agar N. Why Humanity's End: Why We Should Re- ject Radical Enhancement. A Bradford Book; 1a edición. 2010. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014625.003.0001
dc.relation/*ref*/Annas G, Andrews L, Isasi R. Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations. American Journal of Law Medicine. 2002; 28 (2-3): 151-78.
dc.relation/*ref*/Daniels N. Normal Functioning and The Treatment enhancement Distinction, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2000; 9: 309-322. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100903037
dc.relation/*ref*/Cash TF, Henry PE. Women's Body Images: The Results of a National Survey in the U.S.A. Sex Roles. 1995; (33) 19-28. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547933
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodin J, Silberstein LR, Striegel-Moore RH. Women and Weight: A Normative Discontent. En Sonderegger TB (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and Gender. University of Nebraska Press; 1984. pp. 267-307.
dc.relation/*ref*/Jonas H. El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder; 1995.
dc.relation/*ref*/Savulescu J, Bostrom N. Mejoramiento humano. teell Editorial, S.L; 2017.
dc.relation/*ref*/Savulescu J. Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement Human Beings. Gazeta de Antropología [Internet]. 2016; 32 (2). Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/43310
dc.relation/*ref*/Pierce D. Can Biotechnology Abolish Suffering? The Neuroethics Foundation. 2017.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hofmann B. Limits to Human Enhancement: Nature, Disease, Therapy, or Betterment?", en BMC Medical Ethics, 18:56, 2017, p. 7, Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0215-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Dambrot M., de Kerchove D., Flammini F., Kinsner W., MacDonald L., Saracco R. Symbiotic Autonomous Systems White Paper II; 2018.
dc.relation/*ref*/Häggström O. Aspects of Mind Uploading. 2017. Here Be Dragons: Science, Technology and the Future of Humanity; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723547.001.0001
dc.relation/*ref*/Eden A., Steinhart E., Pearce D., Moor J. (Eds.) Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. 1a ed. Springer. 2013. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32560-1
dc.relation/*ref*/Hottois G. Rostros del trans/posthumanismo a la luz de la pregunta por el humanismo. Rev C Bio. Julio-diciembre 2015; 10(2): 75-192. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v10i2.1764
dc.relation/*ref*/Hottois G. ¿El transhumanismo es un humanismo? Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque; 2016.
dc.relation/*ref*/Machesini, R. Over The Human. Post-humanism and The Concept of Animal Epiphany. Springer International Publishing; 2017.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. 2019 Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350059511
dc.relation/*ref*/Kriman A.I. The Idea of the Posthuman: A Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2019; 62(4): 132-147. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-132-147
dc.relation/*ref*/Habermas J. El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? Buenos Aires: Paidós; 2001.
dc.relation/*ref*/Parens E. Is Better Always Good?: The Enhancement Project. En: Enhancing human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. Washington, DC: Erik Parens; 1998. pp. 27-51. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/3527981
dc.relation/*ref*/The Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society. Human enhancement and the future of work. Report from a joint workshop, Academy of Medical Sciences, the British Academy; 2012.
dc.relation/*ref*/European Parliament (Directorate General for Internal Policies. Policy Department. A: Economic And Scientific Policy. Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Human Enhancement; 2009.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ursua N. La "convergencia de tecnologías" (CT) y la "mejora técnica del ser humano": Una visión tecno-fu- turista Thémata. Rev Fil. 2012; 46: 67-90.
dc.relation/*ref*/Harris J. Enhancing Evolution. The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton University Press; 1a ed. 2007
dc.relation/*ref*/Lutz A, Slagter HA, Rawlings NB, Francis AD, Greis- char LL, Davidson RJ. Mental Training Enhances Attentional Stability: Neural and Behavioral Evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001; 29: 13418- 13427. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1614-09.2009
dc.relation/*ref*/Lynch Q, et al. The Likelihood of Cognitive Enhancement. [internet] 2011; 99(2): 116-129. Disponible en: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2011; 99(2): 116-129. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2010.12.024
dc.relation/*ref*/Bostrom N. Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective, Journal of Value Inquiry, 2003. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INQU.0000019037.67783.d5
dc.relation/*ref*/Dresler M, Sandberg A, Ohla K, Bublitz C, Trenado C, Mroczko-Wąsowicz A et al. Non-pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement. Neuropharma. Epub 2012 Jul 22. 2013; 64: 529-43. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Husain M, Mehta MA. Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 201; 15(1): 28-36. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Shook JR, Galvagni L, Giordano J. Cognitive Enhancement Kept within Contexts: Neuroethics and Informed Public Policy. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2014; 8: 228. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00228
dc.relation/*ref*/Cummings J., Zhong K. One Promise and Challenges in Drug Development and Assessment for Cognitive Enhancers. En: Keefe RSE, Reichenberg A, Cummings J, editores. Cognitive Enhancement in CNS Disorders and Beyond. 2018 Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190214401.003.0001
dc.relation/*ref*/Badilla B, Barquero M. Prevalencia del uso de estimulantes en los estudiantes de medicina y farmacia de la universidad de Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 1993; 61: 121-129.
dc.relation/*ref*/Arguedas G, Garnier M, Hong WW, Zaray MC, Rodriguez G. Aspectos médico-legales de los patrones de consumo de bebidas energéticas por parte de los estudiantes de medicina de segundo año de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Med leg Costa Rica. 2012; 29(1): 23-33.
dc.relation/*ref*/Buchanan JC, Pillon SC. Uso de drogas entre estu- diantes de medicina, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem [Internet] 2008; 16(especial). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692008000700015
dc.relation/*ref*/Asencio F, Cardemil F, Betancour P, Celedón F, Mar- tínez F. Prevalencia y factores asociados al uso de drogas, fármacos y otras sustancias por estudiantes de medicina para aumentar el rendimiento académico. CIMEL Cien. E Investig. Médica Estud. Latinoam. 2009;14(2).
dc.relation/*ref*/Teter CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, Boyd CJ, Guthrie SK. Prevalence and Motives for Illicit use of Prescrip- tion Stimulants in an Undergraduate Student Sample. Journal of American College Health. 2005; (53): 253-62. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.6.253-262
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall KM, Irwin MM, Bowman KA, Frankenberger W, Jewett DC. Illicit use of prescribed stimulant medication among college students. Journal of American Co- llege Health. 2005; (53): 167-74. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.4.167-174
dc.relation/*ref*/Repantis D et al. Modafinil and Methylphenildate for Neuroenhancement in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review. Pharmacol. 2010; 62: 187-206. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Smith ME, Farah MJ. Are Prescription Stimulants "Smart Pills"? The Epidemiology and Cognitive Neuroscience of Prescription Stimulant use by Normal Healthy Individuals. Psychological Bulletin. 2011; 137: 717-741. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023825
dc.relation/*ref*/Sahakian BJ et al. The Impact of Neuroscience on Society: Cognitive Enhancement in Neuropsychiatric Disorders and in Healthy People. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015; 370: 20140214. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0214
dc.relation/*ref*/Sarewitz, D. Can Technology Make You Better? Argu- mentos de Razón: 14, 2011, pp. 193-209.
dc.relation/*ref*/Douglas T. Moral Enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2008, 25(3): 228-245. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortega C. et al (eds). El mejoramiento humano avances, investigaciones y reflexiones éticas y políticas. Polígono Juncaril: Editorial Comares, S.L; 2015.
dc.relation/*ref*/Advokat C. What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34(8):1256-66. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Earp BD, Douglas T, Savulescu J. "Moral Neuroenhan- cement" en The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics, NY: Routledge, 2018, p169. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708652-13
dc.relation/*ref*/MacLean KA, Ferrer E, Aichele SR, Bridwell DA, Zanesco AP, Jacobs TL, King BG, Rosenberg EL, Sahdra BK, Shaver PR, Wallace BA, Mangun GR, Saron CD. Intensive meditation training improves perceptual discrimination and sustained attention. Psychologi- cal Science. 2010; 21: 829-839. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610371339
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética
dc.sourceRevista Latinoamericana de Bioética; Vol. 19 Núm. 37-2 (2019); 93-110
dc.source2462-859X
dc.source1657-4702
dc.subjectHuman enhancement
dc.subjectCognitive enhancement
dc.subjectDrugs
dc.subjectTherapies
dc.subjectPerfectionism ethics
dc.subjectMejora humana
dc.subjectMejora cognitiva
dc.subjectFármacos
dc.subjectTerapias
dc.subjectÉtica del perfeccionamiento
dc.subjectMelhoria humana
dc.subjectMelhoria cognitiva
dc.subjectFármacos
dc.subjectTerapias
dc.subjectÉtica do aperfeiçoamento
dc.titleA bioethical Approach to Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Individuals: “The More is not the Better”
dc.titleUna aproximación bioética a la mejora cognitiva en individuos sanos: “Más no es mejor”
dc.titleUma aproximação bioética para a melhoria cognitiva em indivíduos saudáveis: "Mais não é melhor"
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución