The Triple Helix and its Intervention in the Research and Development of Products for International Security and Defense

La Triple Hélice y su intervención en la investigación y el desarrollo de productos para la seguridad y la defensa internacionales;
A Tríplice Hélice e sua Intervenção na Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Produtos para Segurança e Defesa Internacional

dc.creatorGiraldo Martinez, Guillermo Alfonso
dc.creatorValencia Pérez, Luis Rodrigo
dc.date2022-06-30
dc.date2023-03-22T19:12:59Z
dc.date2023-03-22T19:12:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T17:52:56Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T17:52:56Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/5600
dc.identifier10.18359/ries.5600
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/43583
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8693277
dc.descriptionThis article aims to analyze the concepts and relationships of the Triple Helix Model (THM) proposed by Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff as applied to international security and defense and the contribution of THM to the development of knowledge-based economies. The method used was a qualitative, descriptive analysis, reviewing reliable scientific sources and official web pages of countries and organizations such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU). The results showed that the generation of capacities in Science, Technology, and Innovation lead to assets in security and defense and the systemic development of products and innovative initiatives, creating a virtuous circle that allows universities, states and firms, to evolve basing their growth on the development of knowledge. Finally, as a conclusion it was found that investment in research and development in defense and security, articulated with the actors of the Triple Helix, is a driver of technological change that strengthen the concept of knowledge-based economies in the countries that achieve this articulation, as evidenced in the cases analyzed.
dc.descriptionEste artículo tiene como objetivo analizar tanto los conceptos y relaciones del Modelo de la Triple Hélice (MTH) que propone Etzkowitz y Leydesdorff aplicado a la seguridad y la defensa internacionales como la contribución del MTH al desarrollo de economías basadas en el conocimiento. El método utilizado fue un análisis cualitativo y descriptivo mediante la revisión de fuentes científicas confiables y páginas web oficiales de países y organizaciones como la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO), la Organización del Tratado del Atlántico Norte (OTAN) y la Unión Europea (UE). Los resultados mostraron que la generación de capacidades en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación produce activos en seguridad y defensa y conduce al desarrollo sistémico de productos e iniciativas innovadoras. Este círculo virtuoso les permite a universidades, estados y empresas evolucionar fundamentando su crecimiento en el desarrollo del conocimiento. En conclusión, se encontró que la inversión en investigación y desarrollo para la defensa y la seguridad, en articulación con los actores de la Triple Hélice, es un motor de cambio tecnológico que fortalece el concepto de economías basadas en el conocimiento, como se evidencia en los casos analizados.
dc.descriptionEste artigo tem como objetivo analisar os conceitos e relações do Modelo de Hélice Tríplice (THM) proposto por Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff aplicado à segurança e defesa internacional e a contribuição do THM para o desenvolvimento das economias baseadas no conhecimento. O método utilizado foi uma análise qualitativa, descritiva, revisando fontes científicas confiáveis e páginas da web oficiais de países e organizações como a Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura (UNESCO), a Organização do Tratado do Atlântico Norte (OTAN) e a União Europeia (EU). Os resultados mostraram que a geração de capacidades em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação levam a ativos em segurança e defesa e ao desenvolvimento sistêmico de produtos e iniciativas inovadoras, criando um círculo virtuoso que permite que universidades, estados e empresas, evoluir baseando seu crescimento no desenvolvimento do conhecimento. Por fim, como conclusão constatou-se que o investimento em pesquisa e desenvolvimento em defesa e segurança, articulado com os atores da Tríplice Hélice, é um propulsor de mudanças tecnológicas que fortalecem o conceito de economias baseadas no conhecimento nos países que realizam essa articulação, conforme evidenciado nos casos analisados.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/xml
dc.languageeng
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granada
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/5600/5150
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/5600/5319
dc.relation/*ref*/Aguilar, J. M. P., Romero, R. M., Pérez, L. R. V., Palma, A. P., Olalde, A. C., & Hernández, S. (2013). ELEMENTOS PRINCIPALES PARA GENERAR PROYECTOS DE GESTIÓN TECNOLÓGICA EN ESQUEMA DE TRIPLE HÉLICE DESDE LAS FACULTADES. CIENCIA@UAQ, 11.
dc.relation/*ref*/Amarante, J. C. A., & Franko, P. (2017). Defense Transformation in Latin America: Will It Transform the Technological Base? Democracy and Security, 13(3), 173-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2017.1290527
dc.relation/*ref*/Bitzinger, R. A. (2011). China’s Defense Technology and Industrial Base in a Regional Context: Arms Manufacturing in Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 425-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.574985
dc.relation/*ref*/Broude, M., Deger, S., & Sen, S. (2013). Defence, innovation and development: The case of Israel. Journal of Innovation Economics, 12(2), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.012.0037
dc.relation/*ref*/Budden, P., & Murray, F. (2019). Defense Innovation Report: Applying MIT’s Innovation Ecosystem & Stakeholder Approach to Innovation in Defense on a Country-by-Country Basis. MIT Sloan School of Management. https://innovation.mit.edu/assets/Defense-Innovation-Report.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Cesarín, S. M., Moneta, C. J., Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean, & Red de Centros de Estudios de Asia y el Pacífico de América Latina y el Caribe (Eds.). (2005). China y América Latina: Nuevos enfoques sobre cooperación y desarrollo: una segunda ruta de la seda? BID-INTAL : Red de Centros de Estudios de Asia y el Pacífico de América Latina y el Caribe (REDEALAP) ; Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Departamento de Integración y Programas Regionales, División de Integración, Comercio y Asuntos Hemisféricos.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cheung, T. M. (2016). Innovation in China’s Defense Technology Base: Foreign Technology and Military Capabilities. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(5-6), 728-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1208612
dc.relation/*ref*/Congressional Budget Office. (2018). Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Federal R&D Spending: CBO’s Current Approach and Research Needs. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/54089
dc.relation/*ref*/Department of Defence. (2018). Military and Securtiy Developments Involvig the People´s Republic of China 2018. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Aug/16/2001955282/-1/-1/1/2018-CHINA-MILITARY-POWER-REPORT.PDF
dc.relation/*ref*/Department of Defence. (2019). Defence Advantage Research Projects Agency. https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/for-small-businesses
dc.relation/*ref*/Donatas, P. (2019). Israel defense industry, what we can learn from it? Department of Political Science, General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy, Vilnius, Lithuania. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/paperproposal/5757d37f-12fa-4e39-ad5c-fd1074d6a683.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Dzisah, J. (2010). Capitalizing Knowledge: The Mind-Set of Academic Scientists. Critical Sociology, 36(4), 555-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920510365917
dc.relation/*ref*/Eliasson, G. (2010). Saab in South Africa: Technology Transfer to an Industrializing Economy. En G. Eliasson, Advanced Public Procurement as Industrial Policy (Vol. 34, pp. 175-205). Springer New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5849-5_6
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. ocial Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1).
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). THE ENDLESS TRANSITION: A «TRIPLE HELIX» OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT RELATIONS: Introduction. Minerva, 36(3), 203-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004348123030
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1999). The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2/3), 111-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007807302841
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry- government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eurofighter Typhoon. (2019). Eurofighter Typhoon. https://www.eurofighter.com/about-us
dc.relation/*ref*/GANSLER, J. S. (1988). Integrating Civilian and Military Industry. Issues in Science and Technology, 5(1), 68-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101804
dc.relation/*ref*/Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill Education.
dc.relation/*ref*/IMoD. (2021). Unit for Research & Technological Infrastructure. https://english.mod.gov.il:443/About/Innovative_Strength/Pages/Unit_for_Research_&_Technological_Infrastructure.aspx
dc.relation/*ref*/Koster, S. (2004). Spin-off firms and individual start-ups. Are they really different?
dc.relation/*ref*/Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287
dc.relation/*ref*/Matelly, S., & Lima, M. (2016). The influence of the state on the strategic choices of defence companies: The cases of Germany, France and the UK after the Cold War: Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, n°20(2), 61-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.020.0061
dc.relation/*ref*/Ministerio de Defensa de Colombia. (2011). Visión compartida del futuro en ciencia, tecnología e innovación. Antropos Ltda.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mora, M. C. (2014). El modelo de la triple hélice en la comprensión y desarrollo de proyectos sociales complejos en Costa Rica. Revista Nacional de Administración, 5(1), 115-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v5i1.679
dc.relation/*ref*/Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and higher education, 27(4), 237-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodrigues, C., & Melo, A. (2012). The Triple Helix Model as an Instrument of Local Response to the Economic Crisis. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1483-1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709063
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodríguez, C., Rubio, M., & Morales, C. (2018). Brasil, su gran estrategia. En Hacia una gran estrategia en Colombia: Construcción de política pública en seguridad y defensa.Volumen 1: La “Gran Estrategia”: Instrumento para una política integral en seguridad y defensa (Vol. 3, pp. 51-70). ESMIC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21830/9789585692886.02
dc.relation/*ref*/Salazar, M. del P. R., & Valderrama, M. G. (2013). La Alianza Universidad-Empresa-Estado: Una estrategia para promover innovación. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 68, 112-133.
dc.relation/*ref*/SBIR. (2020). The SBIR and STTR Programs. sbir.gov. https://www.sbir.gov/about
dc.relation/*ref*/Schmid, J. (2017). The Diffusion of Military Technology. Defence and Peace Economics, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1292203
dc.relation/*ref*/VP, A. (2019). Venture Capital Firm | Florida | Execution Stage Investors | Ohio | California | Michigan | Arsenal Venture Partners. http://arsenalgrowth.com/
dc.relation/*ref*/Wonglimpiyarat, J., & Khaemasunun, P. (2015). China’s innovation financing system: Triple Helix policy perspectives. Triple Helix, 2(1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0013-y
dc.relation/*ref*/Universidad ICESI. (2019). Proyecto ARPANET. Retrieved May 11, 2019 from https://www.icesi.edu.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022); 31-46
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2022); 31-46
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 17 n. 1 (2022); 31-46
dc.source1909-7743
dc.source1909-3063
dc.titleThe Triple Helix and its Intervention in the Research and Development of Products for International Security and Defense
dc.titleLa Triple Hélice y su intervención en la investigación y el desarrollo de productos para la seguridad y la defensa internacionales
dc.titleA Tríplice Hélice e sua Intervenção na Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Produtos para Segurança e Defesa Internacional
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución