Comportamiento biomecánico de prótesis híbridas implanto soportadas en el maxilar inferior en función de las características geométricas de la subestructura: Estudio de caso de un paciente totalmente edéntulo con pérdida ósea severa

dc.contributorLópez Vaca, Oscar Rodrigo
dc.contributorValencia Niño, Cesar Hernando
dc.contributorMartínez Vega, Ruth Aralí
dc.creatorRodriguez Cuellar, Lina Maria
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T14:14:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T12:14:18Z
dc.date.available2023-08-23T14:14:22Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T12:14:18Z
dc.date.created2023-08-23T14:14:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-23
dc.identifierRodriguez Cuellar, L. M. (2023). Comportamiento biomecánico de prótesis híbridas implanto soportadas en el maxilar inferior en función de las características geométricas de la subestructura: Estudio de caso de un paciente totalmente edéntulo con pérdida ósea severa. [ Tesis de posgrado]. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/51828
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad Santo Tomás
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.usta.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8679347
dc.description.abstractHybrid implant-supported prostheses are used for totally edentulous patients, in 0.17% of the population. The failure of this type of prosthesis is related to mechanical failures due to occlusal overload and a geometry of the substructure that does not allow an adequate distribution of stresses on the prosthesis, the bone and the implants, specifically in patients with severe bone loss. For this reason, it is important to determine the biomechanical behavior of an implant-supported hybrid prosthesis in the lower jaw based on the geometric characteristics of the substructure for a totally edentulous patient with severe bone loss, by planning the clinical case for the personalized design of the substructure of the substructure. implant-supported hybrid prosthesis in order to establish the geometric characteristics and the material for the design of the substructure of the prosthesis considering the anatomical conditions of the patient and in this way numerically determine the state of stresses and deformations by means of computational simulation of the implant-bone interface according to the conditions established for the design of the hybrid prosthesis.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Santo Tomás
dc.publisherMaestría Odontología
dc.publisherFacultad de Odontología
dc.relationAlfaro et al, P. (2012). Fuerza de mordida: su importancia en la masticación, su medición y sus condicionantes clínicos. Parte I. Revista ADM, 69(3). https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/adm/od-2012/od123c.pdf
dc.relationBáez-Rosales, A., Godoy-Böhm, I., Toledo-Sologuren, J., Schlieper-Cacciuttolo, R., CofréCarvajal, M., & Román-Fuentes, R. (2016). Carga inmediata con rehabilitación definitiva en maxilar inferior: reporte de caso. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piro.2015.06.003
dc.relationBandela, V., & Kanaparthi, S. (2021). Finite Element Analysis and Its Applications in Dentistry. In Finite Element Methods and Their Applications. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94064
dc.relationCarmona Ramírez, N. E., Villaraga Ossa, J. A., & Latorre Correa, F. (2020). Evaluación de tres diseños de prótesis implantosoportadas híbridas All-on-4®. Análisis de elementos finitos 3D. Odontología Sanmarquina, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.15381/os.v23i4.17721
dc.relationChen, K. W., Lin, T. M., Liu, P. R., Ramp, L. C., Lin, H. J., Wu, C. T., & Pan, Y. H. (2013). An analysis of the implant-supported overdenture in the edentulous mandible. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12010
dc.relationCosta, R., Filho, P., Filho, H., & Brånemark, P.-I. (2015). Key Biomechanical Characteristics of Complete-Arch Fixed Mandibular Prostheses Supported by Three Implants Developed at P-I Brånemark Institute, Bauru. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3944
dc.relationDa Silva, E., dos Santos, D., Sonego, M., Gomes, J., Pellizzer, E., & Goiato, M. (2018). Does the Presence of a Cantilever Influence the Survival and Success of Partial Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6413
dc.relationDaas, M., Dubois, G., Bonnet, A. S., Lipinski, P., & Rignon-Bret, C. (2008). A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: CoMParison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Medical Engineering and Physics, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.005
dc.relationde Medeiros, R. A., Goiato, M. C., Pesqueira, A. A., Vechiato Filho, A. J., Bonatto, L. D. R., & dos Santos, D. M. (2017). Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Mandibular Complete Denture Using Different Cantilever Lengths and Occlusal Coating Materials. Implant Dentistry, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000534
dc.relationDearden, J. C. (2003). In silico prediction of drug toxicity. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 17(2–4). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025361621494
dc.relationDrago, C. J. (2006). Two new clinical/laboratory protocols for CAD/CAM implant restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association, 137(6). https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0292
dc.relationDurkan, R., Oyar, P., & Deste, G. (2019). Maxillary and mandibular all-on-four implant designs: A review. In Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (Vol. 22, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_273_18
dc.relationFaeghinejad, M., Proussaefs, P., AlHelal, A., & Lozada, J. (2019). The CAD/CAM Compound Prosthesis: Digital Workflow for Fabricating Cement-Retained Zirconia Prosthesis Over Screw-Retained Milled Titanium Bars. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3409
dc.relationFransson, C., Lekholm, U., Jemt, T., & Berglundh, T. (2005). Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01137.
dc.relationGarcía Gargallo, M., Yassin García, S., & Bascones Martínez, A. (2016). Técnicas de preservación de alveolo y de aumento del reborde alveolar: Revisión de la literatura. Av. Periodoncia Implantol. Oral, 28(2).
dc.relationGarcia, J., Rodriguez, L., Valencia, C., & Lopez, O. (2021). Desarrollo de un prototipo de protesis hibrida implantosoportada para pacientes totalmente edéntulos, considerando las características anatómicas y fisiológicas personalizadas, para reducir las probabilidades de falla mecánica.
dc.relationGeng, J. P. A., Tan, K. B. C., & Liu, G. R. (2001). Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. In Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Vol. 85, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115251
dc.relationGoiato, M. C., Garcia, A. R., dos Santos, D. M., & Zuim, P. R. J. (2010). Analysis of masticatory cycle efficiency in complete denture wearers. Journal of Prosthodontics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00520.x
dc.relationGonzalez, J. (2014). The Evolution of Dental Materials for Hybrid Prosthesis. The Open Dentistry Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010085
dc.relationGopi, A., & Edwin, A. (2021). A multicentric study to evaluate the treatment outcome and complications after oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prosthesis. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.016
dc.relationGuevara Perez, S. V., de la Rosa Castolo, G., Thollon, L., & Behr, M. (2018). A 3D characterization method of geometric variation in edentulous mandibles. Morphologie, 102(339). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2018.08.001
dc.relationHaroyan-Darbinyan, E., Romeo-Rubio, M., Río-Highsmith, J. del, Lynch, C. D., & CastilloOyagüe, R. (2022). Fracture resistance of cantilevered full-arch implant-supported hybrid prostheses with carbon fiber frameworks after thermal cycling. Journal of Dentistry, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103902
dc.relationHasan, M. A., & Shiakolas, P. S. (2017). CoMParative stress analysis of lingualized and conventional balanced occlusion schemes in a full-arch fixed implant prosthesis using finite element analysis. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519417500749
dc.relationKatsoulis, J., Wälchli, J., Kobel, S., Gholami, H., & Mericske-Stern, R. (2015). Complications with computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured titanium and soldered gold bars for mandibular implant-overdentures: Short-term observations. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 17(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12130
dc.relationKayabaşi, O., Yüzbasioǧlu, E., & Erzincanli, F. (2006). Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Advances in Engineering Software, 37(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.02.004
dc.relationLakatos, É., Magyar, L., & Bojtár, I. (2011). Material properties of the mandibular trabecular bone. 28th Danubia - Adria - Symposium on Advances in Experimental Mechanics, DAS 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/470539
dc.relationLatorre, F. (2021). Evaluación del comportamiento biomecánico de dos diseños protésicos implantosoportados. Revista Nacional de Odontología, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-4607.2021.01.05
dc.relationLeticia María Lemus Cruz, C. E., Urrutia, Z. A., & Castell, A. C. L. (2009). Origen y evolución de los implantes dentales. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 8(4). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729- 519X2009000400030&lng=es&tlng=es
dc.relationLópez Olivera, J. V., & López Olivera, J. V. (2009). Prevalencia de edentulismo parcial según la Clasificación de Kennedy en el Servicio de Rehabilitación Oral del Centro Médico Naval Cirujano Mayor Santiago Távara. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/2170
dc.relationMaló, P., Rangert, B., & Nobre, M. (2003). “All-on-four” immediate-function concept with brånemark system® implants for completely edentulous mandibles: A retrospective clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 5(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010
dc.relationMarcus Vaccarezza, N., Marchesani Carrasco, F., Grandón Villegas, F., Galdames Gutiérrez, B., Niklitschek Tapia, D., & Millanao Caro, L. (2016). Rehabilitación de rebordes severamente atróficos mediante prótesis híbridas confeccionadas con tecnología de sinterización láser cromo-cobalto; reporte de caso. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piro.2015.03.007
dc.relationMichelinakis, G., Nikolidakis, D., & Apostolakis, D. (2021). Complete Digital Restoration: Implant-Supported Prosthesis Using Rapid Prototyping and a Model-Free Approach. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995), 42(4)
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social MINSALUD. (2014). IV Estudio Nacional De Salud Bucal - ENSAB IV. “Para Saber Cómo Estamos y Saber qué Hacemos.” Colombia. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENSAB-IVSituacion-Bucal-Actual.pdf
dc.relationNegahdari, R., Ghavimi, M. A., Ghanizadeh, M., & Bohlouli, S. (2019). Active tactile sensibility of three-unit implant-supported FPDs versus natural dentition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55748
dc.relationOrganización Mundial de la Salud. (2011). Informe Mundial sobre la Discapacidad 2011. Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/INEC/INTOR/infor me-mundial-discapacidad-oms.pdf
dc.relationÖrtorp, A., & Jemt, T. (2009). Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: A 15-year coMParative follow-up study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00119.
dc.relationOzan, O., & Ramoglu, S. (2015). Effect of implant height differences on different attachment types and peri-implant bone in mandibular two-implant overdentures: 3D finite element study. Journal of Oral Implantology, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00239
dc.relationParr, G. R. (1985). Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90460-3
dc.relationPérez Hernández, Y., Pérez Ayala, D., Elisberth, M. P., Díaz, C. Z., & Vento Blanco, Y. (2015). La rehabilitación protésica en las lesiones bucales del adulto mayor TT - Prosthetic rehabilitation in oral lesions of the aged adult. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar Del
dc.relationQamheya, A. H. A., Yeniyol, S., & Arisan, V. (2015). Full Mouth Oral Rehabilitation by Maxillary Implant Supported Hybrid Denture Employing a Fiber Reinforced Material Instead of Conventional PMMA. Case Reports in Dentistry, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/841745
dc.relationReal-Osuna, J., Almendros-Marqués, N., & Gay-Escoda, C. (2012). Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prosthesis. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17099.
dc.relationRho, J. Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997). Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials, 18(20). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00073-2.
dc.relationRismanchian, M., Bajoghli, F., Mostajeran, Z., Fazel, A., & Eshkevari, P. sadr. (2009). Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. The Journal of Oral Implantology, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.196
dc.relationSahin, S., & Çehreli, M. C. (2001). The Significance of Passive Framework Fit in Implant Prosthodontics: Current Status. Implant Dentistry, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00003.
dc.relationSánchez-Labrador, L., Molinero-Mourelle, P., Brinkmann, J. C. B., Prados-Frutos, J. C., GómezPolo, M., & Martínez-González, J. M. (2021). Clinical behavior and complications of mandibular full-arch fixed dental prostheses supported by three dental implants. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040308
dc.relationShash, Y. H., Elwakad, M. T., A. A. Eldosoky, M., & Dohiem, M. M. (2023). Evaluation of stress and strain on mandible caused by changing the bar material in hybrid prosthesis utilizing “All-on-Four” technique. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.030
dc.relationShillinburg, H., Sumiya, H., & Lowell, W. (2006). Fundamentos esenciales en prótesis fija, Quintessence Pub Co, 3er edición.
dc.relationTallarico, M., Ortensi, L., Martinolli, M., Casucci, A., Ferrari, E., Malaguti, G., Montanari, M., Scrascia, R., Vaccaro, G., Venezia, P., Xhanari, E., & Rodriguez y Baena, R. (2018). Multicenter retrospective analysis of implant overdentures delivered with different design and attachment systems: Results between one and 17 years of follow-Up. Dentistry Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6040071
dc.relationTan, K. B. (1995). The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: is there such a thing as passive fit? In Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore (Vol. 24, Issue 1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7605083/
dc.relationTaşın, S., Turp, I., Bozdağ, E., Sünbüloğlu, E., & Üşümez, A. (2019). Evaluation of strain distribution on an edentulous mandible generated by cobalt-chromium metal alloy fixed complete dentures fabricated with different techniques: An in vitro study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.034
dc.relationTolstunov, L. (2009). Management of Biomechanical Complication of Implant-Supported Restoration of a Patient With Combination Syndrome: A Case Report. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.013
dc.relationUnited-performance-Metals. (2017). Ti-6Al-4V Datasheet. United Performance Metals Datsheet. United-performance-Metals. (2023). C.P. Grade 4 Titanium, Datasheet.
dc.relationVargas, K. F., Caldas, G. A. R., Belinha, J., Natal Jorge, R. M., Hernandez, P. A. G., Ozkomur, A., Smidt, R., Naconecy, M. M., & Schneider, L. E. (2019). CoMParing the stress distribution between atrophic maxillary rehabilitation techniques using FEM. Biodental Engineering V - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biodental Engineering, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429265297-34
dc.relationWang, L., Fu, Z., Hu, Z., Li, M., Qiu, L., & Gao, Z. (2022). Biomechanical behaviour of implant prostheses and adjacent teeth according to bone quality: A finite element analysis. European Journal of Oral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12863
dc.relationZaher, A. M., Haeberle, C. B., & Alhashim, A. (2021). Reinforcement of an interim fixed prosthesis with a denture metal mesh. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 126(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.016
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.titleComportamiento biomecánico de prótesis híbridas implanto soportadas en el maxilar inferior en función de las características geométricas de la subestructura: Estudio de caso de un paciente totalmente edéntulo con pérdida ósea severa


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución