dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorBolnick, Daniel I.
dc.creatorAraujo, Marcio S.
dc.date2013-09-30T18:48:15Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:57:35Z
dc.date2016-10-25T17:06:26Z
dc.date2013-09-30T18:48:15Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:57:35Z
dc.date2016-10-25T17:06:26Z
dc.date2011-07-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T21:17:25Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T21:17:25Z
dc.identifierEvolutionary Ecology Research. Tucson: Evolutionary Ecology Ltd, v. 13, n. 5, p. 439-459, 2011.
dc.identifier1522-0613
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20521
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/20521
dc.identifierWOS:000301681500001
dc.identifierhttp://www.evolutionary-ecology.com/abstracts/v13/2657.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/866210
dc.descriptionBackground: Numerous models show that if morphology and diet are correlated, frequency-dependent competition will lead to fitness differences among phenotypically dissimilar individuals within a species.Hypothesis: Selection acts primarily on diet, and only indirectly on morphology via its correlation with diet.Field sites and organism: British Columbia, Canada; 340 individual threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from McNair Lake and 430 individuals from First Lake.Measurements: Stable isotopes (delta C-13 and delta N-15; a proxy for diet); trophic morphology (quantitative traits and geometric shape variables); and growth rates (RNA/DNA ratios; a proxy for the component of fitness arising from competitive or foraging ability).Analysis: Linear and quadratic regression of growth rate on stable isotopes and morphological variables to calculate the relationship between growth (a fitness proxy) and diet and/or morphology. When both morphology and isotopes affected growth rates, we used a path analysis to separate their effects.Conclusions: In the McNair Lake population, growth was dependent primarily on diet type and only indirectly on trophic morphology. In a second population, path analysis found that isotopes and body shape separately explain variation in growth rates. We infer that, in stickleback, selection on trophic morphology is often a correlated side-effect of selection on diet composition, rather than direct fitness effects of morphology per se.
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEvolutionary Ecology Ltd
dc.relationEvolutionary Ecology Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectdirectional selection
dc.subjectfrequency-dependent selection
dc.subjectfitness landscape
dc.subjectfunction-valued trait
dc.subjectGasterosteus aculeatus
dc.subjectstabilizing selection
dc.subjectstable isotopes
dc.subjecttrophic morphology
dc.titlePartitioning the relative fitness effects of diet and trophic morphology in the threespine stickleback
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución