Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: Immediate versus delayed implantation

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorRibeiro, Fernando Salimon
dc.creatorPontes, Ana Emilia Farias
dc.creatorMarcantonio, Elcio
dc.creatorPiattelli, Adriano
dc.creatorNeto, Rodolfo Jorge Boeck
dc.creatorMarcantonio, Elcio
dc.date2013-09-30T18:32:01Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:45:30Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:59:32Z
dc.date2013-09-30T18:32:01Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:45:30Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:59:32Z
dc.date2008-03-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T20:52:43Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T20:52:43Z
dc.identifierImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 17, n. 1, p. 109-117, 2008.
dc.identifier1056-6163
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16016
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16016
dc.identifier10.1097/ID.0b013e318166cb84
dc.identifierWOS:000253916600014
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318166cb84
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/862917
dc.descriptionPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of maxillary immediate nonfunctional single-tooth loaded implants used into fresh extraction sites (immediate placement condition) or healed ridge (delayed placement condition).Materials and Methods: Eighty-two dental implants were placed in the maxilla of 64 consecutive patients from Private practice office and from a specialization course in Implantology. Forty-six implants were inserted under immediate placement condition, and 36 were inserted under delayed placement condition. The criteria used to evaluate success rate were those previously described by Albrektsson and Zarb (Int J Prosthodont 1993;6: 95-105), and follow-up period ranged from 18.0 to 39.7 months.Results: Seventy-nine implants fulfilled the success rate criteria (96.3%). Moreover, differences concerning implantation condition were not significant (P = 0.33, Qui-square test): three of the failed implants were from immediate placement group (success rate of 93.5%), and none was from delayed placement group (success rate of 100.0%).Conclusion: In the present sample, no statistically significant differences were detected for immediate nonfunctional single-tooth loaded implants under immediate placement condition in comparison with those inserted under delayed placement condition; both protocols had high success rate in maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars areas.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relationImplant Dentistry
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectimmediate loading
dc.subjectimmediate implantation
dc.subjectsuccess rate
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.titleSuccess rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: Immediate versus delayed implantation
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución