dc.contributorUniv Toronto
dc.contributorSunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorDalhousie Univ
dc.contributorQueens Univ
dc.creatorLeake, Pierre-Anthony
dc.creatorCardoso, Roberta
dc.creatorSeevaratnam, Rajini
dc.creatorLourenço, Laércio Gomes [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorHelyer, Lucy
dc.creatorMahar, Alyson
dc.creatorRowsell, Corwyn
dc.creatorCoburn, Natalie G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:27:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T19:05:21Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:27:37Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T19:05:21Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:27:37Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.identifierGastric Cancer. New York: Springer, v. 15, p. S27-S37, 2012.
dc.identifier1436-3291
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35209
dc.identifier10.1007/s10120-011-0071-z
dc.identifierWOS:000313419000005
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8622594
dc.description.abstractBackground There is lack of uniformity in the utilization of peritoneal cytology in gastric cancer management. the identification of intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) is believed to confer poor prognosis. However, while some of these patients are palliated, others may undergo more aggressive therapies. in this review, we aimed to identify and synthesize findings on the use of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence and overall survival in curative gastric cancer patients.Methods Electronic literature searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2009. We determined the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence based on four techniques-conventional cytology, immunoassay, immunohistochemistry, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Recurrence rates and overall survival rates for curative patients were determined, based on positivity or negativity for IFCCs.Results Twenty-eight articles were included. All four techniques showed wide variations in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting peritoneal recurrence. Recurrence rates for patients positive for IFCCs ranged from 11.1 to 100%, while those negative for IFCCs had recurrence rates of 0-51%. Overall survival was significantly reduced for patients with positive IFCCs. Short follow-up periods and possible duplication of results may limit result interpretation.Conclusion the presence of IFCCs appears to increase the risk of peritoneal recurrence and is associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Further incorporation of peritoneal cytology in clinical decision-making in gastric cancer depends on the development of a consistently accurate and rapid IFCC detection method.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationGastric Cancer
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectGastric cancer
dc.subjectCytology
dc.subjectPeritoneal cavity
dc.subjectRecurrence
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.titleA systematic review of the accuracy and utility of peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer
dc.typeResenha


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución