dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorMargonar, Rogerio
dc.creatordos Santos, Pamela Leticia
dc.creatorQueiroz, Thallita Pereira
dc.creatorMarcantonio, Elcio
dc.date2013-09-30T18:29:21Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:43:13Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:57:50Z
dc.date2013-09-30T18:29:21Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:43:13Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:57:50Z
dc.date2010-11-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T20:46:19Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T20:46:19Z
dc.identifierJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 21, n. 6, p. 1894-1896, 2010.
dc.identifier1049-2275
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15052
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15052
dc.identifier10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f4af65
dc.identifierWOS:000284829800056
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f4af65
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/862118
dc.descriptionCurrently, there are several techniques for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillary ridges in literature. The grafting procedure using autogenous bone is considered ideal by many researchers, as it shows osteogenic capability and causes no antigenic reaction. However, this type of bone graft has some shortcomings, mainly the restricted availability of donor sites. In recent years, several alternatives have been investigated to supply the disadvantages of autogenous bone grafts. In such studies, allogeneic bone grafts, which are obtained from individuals with different genetic load, but from the same species, have been extensively used. They can be indicated in cases of arthroplasty, surgical knee reconstruction, large bone defects, and in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Besides showing great applicability and biocompatibility, this type of bone is available in unlimited quantities. on the other hand, allogeneic bone may have the disadvantage of transmitting infectious diseases. Atrophic maxillae can be treated with bone grafts followed by osseointegrated implants to obtain aesthetic and functional oral rehabilitation. This study aimed to show the viability of allogeneic bone grafting in an atrophic maxilla, followed by oral rehabilitation with dental implant and protocol-type prosthesis within a 3-year follow-up period by means of a clinical case report.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectHomologous
dc.subjectbone transplantation
dc.subjectdental implantation
dc.titleRehabilitation of Atrophic Maxilla Using the Combination of Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Grafts Followed by Protocol-Type Prosthesis
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución