Utilização de diferentes equações e métodos a estimativa do gasto energético basal e total de praticantes de atividade física adultos

dc.creatorTavares Frade, Rogerio Eduardo
dc.creatorViebig, Renata Furlan [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorPereira, Marina de Sousa
dc.creatorRuza, Natalia Batista
dc.creatorValente, Thais Rittner
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T10:30:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T18:45:52Z
dc.date.available2019-01-21T10:30:06Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T18:45:52Z
dc.date.created2019-01-21T10:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierRbne-Revista Brasileira De Nutricao Esportiva. Sao paulo, v. 10, n. 55, p. 43-49, 2016.
dc.identifier1981-9927
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49584
dc.identifierWOS000371910200006.pdf
dc.identifierWOS:000371910200006
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8618759
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and Aims: The BEC (Basal Energy Cost /GEB) is the energy used by every cell in the human body for the maintenance of its operation. The Energy Expenditure with Physical Activities (GAF), added to the GEB and determine the GET. To estimate the GET physically active individuals is necessary to know the type of exercise performed, the frequency of training, duration and intensity. This study aimed to evaluate the different equations to estimate the GET, compare the results and point out the possible differences. Methods: A study carried out in two stages, the first part consists of a literature review and the second evaluated the GET two adult volunteers (one male and one female) regularly physically active. Results: We found in the literature five equations that estimate the GEB, WHO (1985), FAO / WHO / UNU (1985), Schofield (1985), Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) and Harris Benedict (1919), from these equations the calculations of GEB, GET and GAF for each volunteer were performed. Discussion: When selecting an equation to estimate the GEB and GET gender, the variables (weight, height and age), factor activity and METs are important requirements to determine the energy requirement. All equations had higher estimates for males. The method of Harris-Benedit gave an estimation of the GEB, GET and REE + MET larger than the other methods. Conclusion: It was found that there were no relevant differences between the equations, so all are suitable for use.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherInst brasileiro pesquisa & ensino fisiologia exercicio-ibpefex
dc.relationRbne-Revista Brasileira De Nutricao Esportiva
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectPhysical Activity
dc.subjectBasal Metabolism
dc.subjectEnergetic Cost
dc.subjectPredition Equation
dc.titleUses of equations and methods to estimate the basal energetic cost and the total energetic cost of adults that practice physical activities: a case study
dc.titleUtilização de diferentes equações e métodos a estimativa do gasto energético basal e total de praticantes de atividade física adultos
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución