dc.contributorCtr Addict & Mental Hlth
dc.contributorSimon Fraser Univ
dc.contributorUniv Toronto
dc.contributorParnassia Addict Res Ctr
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorFed Univ Brasilia
dc.contributorBritish Columbia Ctr Dis Control
dc.contributorUniv British Columbia
dc.contributorBC Ctr Excellence HIV AIDS
dc.creatorFischer, Benedikt
dc.creatorBlanken, Peter
dc.creatorDa Silveira, Dartiu [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorGallassi, Andrea
dc.creatorGoldner, Elliot M.
dc.creatorRehm, Juergen
dc.creatorTyndall, Mark
dc.creatorWood, Evan
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:40:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T18:37:59Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:40:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T18:37:59Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:40:19Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Drug Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 26, n. 4, p. 352-363, 2015.
dc.identifier0955-3959
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38946
dc.identifier10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.002
dc.identifierWOS:000351796200004
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8617075
dc.description.abstractThere are an estimated several million crack-cocaine users globally; use is highest in the Americas. Most crack users are socio-economically marginalized (e.g., homeless), and feature elevated risks for morbidity (e.g., blood-borne viruses), mortality and crime/violence involvement, resulting in extensive burdens. No comprehensive reviews of evidence-based prevention and/or treatment interventions specifically for crack use exist. We conducted a comprehensive narrative overview of English-language studies on the efficacy of secondary prevention and treatment interventions for crack (cocaine) abuse/dependence. Literature searches (1990-2014) using pertinent keywords were conducted in main scientific databases. Titles/abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and full studies were included in the review if involving a primary prevention/treatment intervention study comprising a substantive crack user sample. Intervention outcomes considered included drug use, health risks/status (e.g., HIV or sexual risks) and select social outcome indicators. Targeted (e.g., behavioral/community-based) prevention measures show mixed and short-term effects on crack use/HIV risk outcomes. Material (e.g., safer crack use kit distribution) interventions also document modest efficacy in risk reduction; empirical assessments of environmental (e.g., drug consumption facilities) for crack smokers are not available. Diverse psychosocial treatment (including contingency management) interventions for crack abuse/dependence show some positive but also limited/short-term efficacy, yet likely constitute best currently available treatment options. Ancillary treatments show little effects but are understudied. Despite ample studies, pharmacotherapeutic/immunotherapy treatment agents have not produced convincing evidence; select agents may hold potential combined with personalized approaches and/or psycho-social strategies. No comprehensively effective 'gold-standard' prevention/treatment interventions for crack abuse exist; concerted research towards improved interventions is urgently needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationInternational Journal of Drug Policy
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectCrack-cocaine
dc.subjectDependence
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectReview
dc.titleEffectiveness of secondary prevention and treatment interventions for crack-cocaine abuse: A comprehensive narrative overview of English-language studies
dc.typeResenha


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución