dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorLopes, Marcelo B. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorAraujo, Lara Q. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorPassos, Michelle T. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorNishida, Sonia Kiyomi [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorKirsztajn, Gianna Mastroianni [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorCendoroglo, Maysa Seabra [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorSesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:34:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T18:24:52Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:34:51Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T18:24:52Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:34:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-02
dc.identifierBmc Nephrology. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 9 p., 2013.
dc.identifier1471-2369
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37072
dc.identifierWOS000329747500001.pdf
dc.identifier10.1186/1471-2369-14-265
dc.identifierWOS:000329747500001
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8614339
dc.description.abstractBackground: Equations to estimate GFR have not been well validated in the elderly and may misclassify persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We measured GFR and compared the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi) and the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians.Methods: Using cross-sectional analysis we assessed 95 very elderly persons (mean 85 years) living in the community. GFR was measured by iohexol (mGFR) and compared with estimates using six equations: MDRD, CKD-Epi_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine and BIS_creatinine-cystatin.Results: Mean mGFR was 55 (range, 19-86) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Bias was smaller with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and the CKD-Epi_creatinine equations (-4.0 and 1.7 ml/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of mGFR) was greater with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine equations (85%, 83% and 80%, respectively). Among the creatinine-based equations, the BIS_creatinine had the greatest accuracy at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the CKD-Epi_creatinine was superior at higher GFRs (79% and 90%, respectively). the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and CKD-Epi_cystatin equations yielded the greatest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at GFR threshold = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (0.88, 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). in participants classified based on the BIS_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, or BIS_creatinine-cystatin equations, the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation tended to improve CKD classification (net reclassification index: 12.7%, p = 0.18; 6.7%, p = 0.38; and 15.9%; p = 0.08, respectively).Conclusions: GFR-estimating equations CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine-cystatin showed better accuracy than other equations using creatinine or cystatin C alone in very elderly persons. the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation appears to be advantageous in CKD classification. If cystatin C is not available, both the BIS_cr equation and the CKD-Epi_cr equation could be used, although at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the BIS_cr equation seems to be the best alternative.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBiomed Central Ltd
dc.relationBmc Nephrology
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectChronic kidney disease
dc.subjectCreatinine
dc.subjectCystatin C
dc.subjectElderly
dc.subjectGlomerular filtration rate
dc.subjectIohexol
dc.titleEstimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución