Urethral reconstruction after total penectomy for urethral cancer

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorde Jesus, CMN
dc.creatorKawano, Paulo Roberto
dc.creatorYamamoto, Hamilto Akihissa
dc.creatorTrindade, JCS
dc.creatorAgostinho, Aparecido Donizeti
dc.creatorCorrêa, Luiz Antonio
dc.date2014-05-20T13:38:45Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:54:50Z
dc.date2014-05-20T13:38:45Z
dc.date2016-10-25T16:54:50Z
dc.date2004-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T20:35:54Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T20:35:54Z
dc.identifierUrologia Internationalis. Basel: Karger, v. 72, n. 4, p. 281-283, 2004.
dc.identifier0042-1138
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13435
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/13435
dc.identifier10.1159/000077678
dc.identifierWOS:000221576000002
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000077678
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/860768
dc.descriptionA 59-year-old white man developed a ventral ulcer with irregular limits in the middle portion of the penis. The result of the pathologic analysis was compatible with invasive squamous cell urethral carcinoma. A total penectomy was performed. In these cases, the usually recommended urinary diversion is perineal urethrostomy. However, due to the specifications of the case, perineal urethrostomy could not be performed. The literature did not offer any other alternative for patients with this same condition. Therefore, a urethral reconstruction using a groin skin flap had to be performed. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relationUrologia Internationalis
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjecturethral cancer
dc.subjecturethral stricture
dc.subjecttubular groin skin flap
dc.subjectpenile carcinoma, treatment
dc.subjectperineal urethrostomy
dc.titleUrethral reconstruction after total penectomy for urethral cancer
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución