dc.creatorRescorla, Leslie A.
dc.creatorAchenbach, Thomas M.
dc.creatorIvanova, Masha Y.
dc.creatorTurner, Lori V.
dc.creatorÁrnadóttir, Hervör Alma
dc.creatorAu, Alma
dc.creatorCaldas, J. Carlos
dc.creatorChen, Yi Chuen
dc.creatorDecoster, Jeroen
dc.creatorFontaine, Johnny R. J.
dc.creatorFunabiki, Yasuko
dc.creatorGudmundsson, Halldór S.
dc.creatorLeung, Patrick
dc.creatorLiu, Jianghong
dc.creatorMaras, Jelena Srdanovic
dc.creatorOh, Kyung Ja
dc.creatorda Rocha, Marina M.
dc.creatorSamaniego, Virginia Corina
dc.creatorSilvares, Edwiges Ferreira de Mattos
dc.creatorŠimulionienė, Roma
dc.creatorSokoli, Elvisa
dc.creatorVázquez, Natalia
dc.creatorZasępa, Ewa
dc.date2023-07-03T15:00:16Z
dc.date2023-07-03T15:00:16Z
dc.date2016
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T15:41:08Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T15:41:08Z
dc.identifierRescorla, L.A., et al. Collateral reports and cross-informant agreement about adult psychopathology in 14 societies [en línea]. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2016, 38 doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9541-2 Disponible en: https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16657
dc.identifier1573-3505
dc.identifier0882-2689
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/16657
dc.identifier10.1007/s10862-016-9541-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8526799
dc.descriptionAbstract: To advance international mental health assessment, instruments that have been internationally validated are needed. To this end, we analyzed ratings from 14 societies on the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL), a collateral-report form parallel to the Adult Self-Report (ASR; Achenbach and Rescorla 2003) for ages 18 to 59. Both the ABCL and the ASR assess problems, personal strengths, and adaptive functioning. For a sample of 8322 see note below collaterals, we found strong consistency across societies regarding which ABCL problem items tended to obtain relatively low, medium, or high ratings. Most societal effect sizes (ESs) for problem scale scores were small to medium (< 13.9 %), but the ES for the ABCL Personal Strengths scale was 25 %. For most of the same participants (N = 8,302), we analyzed cross-informant agreement between self-reports on the ASR and collateral reports on the ABCL. Cross-informant correlations for problem scale scores averaged .47, with considerable societal variation. Problem score means were higher on the ASR than the ABCL in every society, but the size of the difference varied across societies. Mean item ratings on the ABCL and ASR were highly correlated within every society (mean r = .92), but within-dyad item rating agreement varied widely in every society (mean r = .39). In all societies, non-corroboration of self-reported deviance and of collateral-reported deviance was common. Overall findings indicated considerable similarity but also some important differences in collateral-reported problems and adaptive functioning across 14 societies.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsAcceso restringido
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2016, 38
dc.subjectPSICOPATOLOGIA
dc.subjectADULTOS
dc.subjectSALUD MENTAL
dc.titleCollateral reports and cross-informant agreement about adult psychopathology in 14 societies
dc.typeArtículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución