dc.contributorViveros Montoya, Luis Felipe
dc.creatorAguirre Gómez, Matías
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T22:49:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T13:50:17Z
dc.date.available2023-02-07T22:49:22Z
dc.date.available2023-08-28T13:50:17Z
dc.date.created2023-02-07T22:49:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/32115
dc.identifier344.03288 A284
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8441119
dc.description.abstractThe means of control of "direct reparation" is one of the procedural means through which the victims of serious human rights violations can satisfy their rights of access to justice as a matter of international law (Arts 8 and 25 ACHR), particularly the right to reparation. Access to this judicial remedy has several limits set by law, including the expiration rule. This monograph asks whether the expiration rule, as it has been interpreted by the Colombian Council of State, is consistent with the international obligations of the State to guarantee access to an effective judicial remedy that, inter alia, allows obtaining full reparation for the damage derived from the serious violations of international human rights law committed by the State.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherDerecho
dc.publisherEscuela de Derecho. Departamento de Derecho
dc.publisherMedellín
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightsTodos los derechos reservados
dc.subjectCaducidad
dc.subjectPrescripción
dc.subjectAcción de reparación directa
dc.subjectViolaciones a los derechos humanos
dc.subjectDelitos de lesa humanidad
dc.subjectDerecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos
dc.titleDerecho de acceso a la justicia y reparación directa : caducidad, seguridad jurídica y derecho a la reparación de víctimas de graves violaciones de Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional Humanitario
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución