dc.creatorRossel, Cecilia
dc.creatorAntía, Florencia
dc.creatorStraschnoy, Mora
dc.creatorOsorio, Cecilia
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-30T18:55:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T17:40:05Z
dc.date.available2023-06-30T18:55:11Z
dc.date.available2023-08-24T17:40:05Z
dc.date.created2023-06-30T18:55:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10895/1823
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8425986
dc.description.abstractAlthough all Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) that have been promoted in Latin America establish some kind of conditionality, there is high heterogeneity in the way they condition cash benefits. This project explores the origins of Latin America’s different approaches to designing and implementing CCT programs, based on three case studies (Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay) with different conditionality models. We use process-tracing to test four main explanations of the variation in conditionality models: partisanship, political competition, diffusion and policy legacies. This method allows us to generate systematic new evidence concerning the diverse conditionalities that characterize CCT programs in the region. More specifically, our approach advances understanding of the causal processes that lead governments to choose between different types of conditionalities. In so doing, the project contributes to the literatures on the politics of conditionality in welfare programs and on the politics of social policy in Latin America.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons Atribución – No Comercial – Sin Derivadas (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)e
dc.subjectPolíticas sociales
dc.subjectSubsidios familiares
dc.subjectAmérica Latina
dc.titleThe politics of conditioning social benefits in Latin America: evidence from Argentina, Chile and Uruguay [pre-analysis plan]
dc.typeInforme de investigación


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución