dc.contributor | Benoit, Jean Pierre. London Buisness School | |
dc.contributor | Dubra, Juan. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay | |
dc.creator | Benoit, Jean Pierre | |
dc.creator | Dubra, Juan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-04T19:50:36Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-24T17:17:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-04T19:50:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-24T17:17:40Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-07-04T19:50:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1362 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8424874 | |
dc.description.abstract | Numerous experiments demonstrate attitude polarization. For instance, Lord, Ross & Lepper presented subjects with the same mixed evidence on the deterrent effect of the death penalty. Both believers and skeptics of its deterrent effect became more convinced of their views; that is, the population polarized. However, not all experiments find this attitude polarization. We propose a theory of rational updating that accounts for both the positive and negative experimental findings. This is in contrast to existing theories,
which predict either too much or too little polarization. | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Montevideo, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economía, Departamento de Economía | |
dc.relation | Documentos de trabajo del Departamento de Economía | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Abierto | |
dc.subject | Attitude polarization | |
dc.subject | Confirmation bias | |
dc.subject | Bayesian decision making | |
dc.title | When do populations polarize? An explanation | |
dc.type | Documentos de trabajo | |