dc.creatorSiniša, Rodin
dc.date2000
dc.date2022-03-21T20:25:03Z
dc.date2022-03-21T20:25:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T16:53:05Z
dc.date.available2023-08-23T16:53:05Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/1/C2D_WP1a.pdf
dc.identifierurn:issn:1662-8152 (E)
dc.identifierhttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/77924
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8379317
dc.descriptionPopular sovereignty in Croatia can be exercised either by representation, or by direct democracy, i.e. by direct popular involvement in decision making. Following initial overview of legal rules regulating exercise of direct democracy in Croatia, it will be demonstrated that almost complete absence of national referenda over the past eight years of Croatia's independence can be explained by specific political consensus among the President of the Republic, the Parliamentary majority and the Government. I will also present relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court on the point and try to answer to what extent probability of referenda in Croatia depends on institutional balance.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.relationhttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/95813/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceSiniša, Rodin (2000). Croatia Country Report. c2d Working Papers Series 1a, Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA) at the University of Zurich.
dc.subjectC2D Working Paper Series
dc.subject320 Political science
dc.subject340 Law
dc.subject900 History
dc.titleCroatia Country Report
dc.typeWorking Paper
dc.typeNonPeerReviewed


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución