dc.creatorGláucia Silva
dc.date2009
dc.date2022-03-17T17:56:47Z
dc.date2022-03-17T17:56:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T16:42:04Z
dc.date.available2023-08-23T16:42:04Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21817691007
dc.identifierhttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/49104
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8376532
dc.descriptionThis article discusses the specificity of citizens' "participation" in contexts of decision-making on the acceptance of nuclear risk, demonstrating that such acceptance depends on mediation by professionals who are willing to translate the typical scientific jargon of technical reports and/or produce their own reports, by way of counter-expertise; otherwise, lay people are unable to confer scientific legitimacy to their arguments. The basic empirical references for the current analysis are the recurrent themes from public hearings organized for licensing of two Brazilian nuclear power plants using German technology, Angra 2 and Angra 3, with an emphasis on the latter, now undergoing prior environmental licensing. The forms of "social control" engendered in France serve as a counterpoint for developing the article's argument.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagept
dc.publisherUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.relationhttp://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=218
dc.rightsDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
dc.sourceDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Brasil) Num.3 Vol.52
dc.subjectSociología
dc.subjectNuclear risk
dc.subjectpeople's participation
dc.subjectexpertise
dc.titleExpertise e participação da população em contexto de risco nuclear: democracia e licenciamento ambiental de Angra 3
dc.typeartículo científico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución