dc.creatorLiliana Acero
dc.date2010
dc.date2022-03-17T17:57:01Z
dc.date2022-03-17T17:57:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T16:40:18Z
dc.date.available2023-08-23T16:40:18Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21817697003
dc.identifierhttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/49137
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8376057
dc.descriptionThis article analyzes the main rhetorical approaches, themes, and strategies in the contemporary public debate on stem cell research and therapies in Brazil. Based on previous studies, analysis of the transcripts from public hearings, newspaper clippings, and 15 semi-structured interviews with researchers, public policymakers, and representatives of organized civil society, the article discusses divergences and convergences between the proponents and opponents of such research. The results are compared to trends in the United Kingdom, a leading country in the field, concluding that the main difference between the two countries lies in the form of social inclusion and public participation.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagept
dc.publisherUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.relationhttp://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=218
dc.rightsDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
dc.sourceDados - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Brasil) Num.4 Vol.53
dc.subjectSociología
dc.subjectStem cell research
dc.subjectpublic policies
dc.subjectembryonic cells
dc.subjectpublic debate
dc.subjectpublic participation
dc.subjectsocial inclusion
dc.subjectbiotechnology
dc.titleCiência, políticas públicas e inclusão social: debates sobre células-tronco no Brasil e no Reino Unido
dc.typeartículo científico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución