| dc.contributor | Cevallos Monar., Carlos Alfredo | |
| dc.creator | Rodríguez Vega, Ronaldo Jacobo | |
| dc.date | 2023-05-29T16:57:56Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-05-29T16:57:56Z | |
| dc.date | 2023 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T17:01:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-08T17:01:55Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/14020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8042886 | |
| dc.description | Currently, there are several options when selecting a methodology for software development. Therefore, the present case study focuses on determining which methodology turns out to be more recommendable, showing advantages, disadvantages and, in turn, the type of project that each one is adapted to. Long ago, the austere methodologies, also called traditional methodologies, dominated, which existed a lot of documentation, actions and roles. After the year 2000, other types of methodologies emerged, more agile and effective for software development. These methodologies were developed to be applied in small and medium projects that have constantly changing requirements. In certain companies in Ecuador, this type of methodology (agile) is used with the aim of correcting problems of time, money and quality in software development. While traditional methodologies are applied to large projects, which have more stable requirements and do not change as frequently. Based on the aforementioned, it is desired to explain the methodologies: Scrum, Rup. Taking into account all the details and determining the proper use and approach of each one. | |
| dc.description | Currently, there are several options when selecting a methodology for software development. Therefore, the present case study focuses on determining which methodology turns out to be more recommendable, showing advantages, disadvantages and, in turn, the type of project that each one is adapted to. Long ago, the austere methodologies, also called traditional methodologies, dominated, which existed a lot of documentation, actions and roles. After the year 2000, other types of methodologies emerged, more agile and effective for software development. These methodologies were developed to be applied in small and medium projects that have constantly changing requirements. In certain companies in Ecuador, this type of methodology (agile) is used with the aim of correcting problems of time, money and quality in software development. While traditional methodologies are applied to large projects, which have more stable requirements and do not change as frequently. Based on the aforementioned, it is desired to explain the methodologies: Scrum, Rup. Taking into account all the details and determining the proper use and approach of each one. | |
| dc.description | En la actualidad, existen varias opciones al momento de seleccionar una metodología para el desarrollo de software. Por lo tanto, el presente caso de estudio se enfoca en determinar que metodología resulta ser más recomendable, mostrando ventajas, desventajas y a su vez al tipo de proyecto que se adapta cada una. Tiempo atrás dominaban las metodologías austeras, también denominadas metodologías tradicionales, las cuales existía bastante documentación, acciones y roles. Después del año 2000 surgen otros tipos de metodologías, más ágiles y eficaces para desarrollo de software. Estas metodologías fueron desarrolladas para aplicarlas en pequeños y medianos proyectos que tienen requerimientos que cambian constantemente. En ciertas empresas del Ecuador se usa este tipo de metodología (ágiles) con el objetivo de corregir problemas de tiempo, dinero y calidad en el desarrollo de software. Mientras que las metodologías tradicionales, son aplicadas para proyectos de gran tamaño, que tienen requerimientos más estables y no cambian con tanta frecuencia. Con base en lo antes mencionado, se desea explicar las metodologías: Scrum, Rup. Tomando en cuenta todos los detalles y determinar el uso y enfoque adecuado de cada una. | |
| dc.format | 28 p. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | es | |
| dc.publisher | Babahoyo: UTB-FAFI. 2023 | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | |
| dc.subject | Metodología de software | |
| dc.subject | Metodología tradicional | |
| dc.subject | Metodología ágil | |
| dc.subject | Rup | |
| dc.subject | Scrum | |
| dc.title | Estudio comparativo de la metodología de software rup y scrum en el desarrollo de software. | |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | |
