dc.creatorMhlanga, B.
dc.creatorErcoli, L.
dc.creatorPellegrino, E.
dc.creatorOnofri, A.
dc.creatorThierfelder, C.
dc.date2021-04-24T00:25:12Z
dc.date2021-04-24T00:25:12Z
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T20:07:36Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T20:07:36Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/21489
dc.identifier10.1007/s13593-021-00687-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7513270
dc.descriptionConservation agriculture has been promoted to sustainably intensify food production in smallholder farming systems in southern Africa. However, farmers have rarely fully implemented all its components, resulting in different combinations of no-tillage, crop rotation, and permanent soil cover being practiced, thus resulting in variable yield responses depending on climatic and soil conditions. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the effect of conservation agriculture components on yield stability. We hypothesized that the use of all three conservation agriculture components would perform the best, resulting in more stable production in all environments. We evaluated at, eight trial locations across southern Africa, how partial and full implementation of these components affected crop yield and yield stability compared with conventional tillage alone or combined with mulching and/or crop rotation. Grain yield and shoot biomass of maize and cowpea were recorded along with precipitation for 2 to 5 years. Across different environments, the addition of crop rotation and mulch to no-tillage increased maize grain by 6%, and the same practices added to conventional tillage led to 13% yield increase. Conversely, adding only mulch or crop rotation to no-tillage or conventional tillage led to lower or equal maize yield. Stability analyses based on Shukla’s index showed for the first time that the most stable systems are those in which mulch is added without crop rotation. Moreover, the highest yielding systems were the least stable. Finally, additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis allowed clarifying that mulch added to no-tillage gives stable yields on sandy soil with high rainfall. Similarly, mulch added to conventional tillage gives stable yield on sandy soil, but under low rainfall. This is the first study that highlighted the crucial role of mulch to enhance the stability and resilience of cropping systems in southern Africa, supporting their adaptability to climate change.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13593-021-00687-y#Sec13
dc.rightsCIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.source2
dc.source41
dc.source1774-0746
dc.sourceAgronomy for Sustainable Development
dc.source29
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
dc.subjectYield Stability
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
dc.subjectZERO TILLAGE
dc.subjectCONSERVATION AGRICULTURE
dc.subjectYIELDS
dc.titleThe crucial role of mulch to enhance the stability and resilience of cropping systems in southern Africa
dc.typeArticle
dc.typePublished Version
dc.coverageSouthern Africa
dc.coverageGermany


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución