dc.creator | Erenstein, O. | |
dc.creator | Cadena Iñiguez, P. | |
dc.date | 2012-01-06T05:08:13Z | |
dc.date | 2012-01-06T05:08:13Z | |
dc.date | 1997 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-17T19:55:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-17T19:55:22Z | |
dc.identifier | 1405-2830 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10883/945 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7508274 | |
dc.description | Data from a 1994 survey of 82 farmers who grow maize on steep hillsides in Motozintla, Chiapas, provided information on agricultural practices, including the adoption of conservation tillage practices; the profitability of the local maize-bean intercropping system; and factors affecting diffusion of conservation tillage practices. Adoption of conservation tillage appears promising: farmers no longer burn crop residues but leave them in the field as mulch, and 66% of survey farmers had adopted the no-tillage component of the technology. At present, however, only 29% of farmers are true adopters of both components of conservation tillage. Farmers who adopt both components obtain more favorable yields and farm budgets. Adopters of the mulch component of the technology appear to be less exposed to production risks. Results of a multivariate logistic model indicate that adoption of the mulch component can largely be explained by the slope of the maize field, which affects access of livestock to the field for grazing on crop residues. Adoption of the no-tillage component was explained by the availability of cash and farm size. Communal livestock pressure had a significant effect on adoption of both components, as did the availability of family labor. State agricultural policy also stimulated adoption, particularly the distribution of incentives, in combination with the local law against burning. However, because farmers still use local varieties, system productivity remains low. In addition to improving the productivity of the system, the use of improved varieties could also increase the availability of residues for forage or mulch. | |
dc.description | vii, 51 pages | |
dc.format | PDF | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | CIMMYT | |
dc.relation | CIMMYT NRG Paper | |
dc.rights | CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. | |
dc.rights | Open Access | |
dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | CROPPING SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | HIGHLANDS | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION ADOPTION | |
dc.subject | CONSERVATION TILLAGE | |
dc.subject | ZEA MAYS | |
dc.subject | CROPPING SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | HIGHLANDS | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION ADOPTION | |
dc.subject | CONSERVATION TILLAGE | |
dc.subject | ZEA MAYS | |
dc.title | The adoption of conservation tillage in a hillside maize production system in Motozintla, Chiapas | |
dc.type | Book | |
dc.coverage | Chiapas | |
dc.coverage | Mexico | |