dc.creatorSalazar, Martín R.
dc.creatorEspeche, Walter Gastón
dc.creatorAizpurúa, Marcelo
dc.creatorLeiva Sisnieguez, Carlos Enrique
dc.creatorLeiva Sisnieguez, Betty Cecilia
dc.creatorDulbecco, Carlos Alberto
dc.creatorMarch, Carlos E.
dc.creatorStavile, Rodolfo Nicolás
dc.creatorFerrari, Edgardo
dc.creatorCorrea, María Verónica
dc.creatorMaciel, Pablo M.
dc.creatorBalbín, Eduardo
dc.creatorCarbajal, Horacio Antonio
dc.date2015
dc.date2022-02-02T18:25:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-15T05:14:56Z
dc.date.available2023-07-15T05:14:56Z
dc.identifierhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/130356
dc.identifierissn:1476-5527
dc.identifierissn:0950-9240
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7472644
dc.descriptionWe evaluated the consequences of excluding the first of three blood pressure (BP) readings in different settings: a random population sample (POS, n=1525), a general practice office (GPO, n=942) and a specialized hypertension center (SHC, n=462). Differences between systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) estimates obtained including and excluding the first reading were compared and their correlation with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was estimated. The samples were divided into quartiles according to the difference between the third and the first SBP (3-1ΔSBP). SBP decreased through sequential readings, 3-1ΔSBP was -5.5 ± 9.7 mm Hg (P<0.001), -5.1 ± 10.4 mm Hg (P<0.001) and -6.1 ± 9.3 mm Hg (P<0.001) for POS, GPO and SHC, respectively. However, individuals included in the top quartile of 3-1ΔSBP showed their highest values on the third reading. The mean SBP estimate was significantly higher excluding the first reading (P<0.001), but the differences among both approaches were small (1.5-1.6 mm g). Moreover, the correlation between SBP values including and excluding the first reading and daytime ABPM were comparable (r = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively). Similar results were observed for DBP. In conclusion, our study does not support the notion of discarding the first BP measurement and suggests that it should be measured repeatedly, regardless the first value.
dc.descriptionFacultad de Ciencias Médicas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format373-378
dc.languageen
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.subjectMedicina
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.titleShould the first blood pressure reading be discarded?
dc.typeArticulo
dc.typeArticulo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución