Afectación de la fórmula “nullum crimen nulla poena sine praevia lege” por dos fallos que postulan la imprescriptibilidad de los delitos de corrupción
Breach of the formula “nullum crimen nulla poena sine praevia lege” by two judicial resolutions which postulate the non applicability of statutory limitations to corruption crimes
| dc.creator | Rives, Emanuel | |
| dc.date | 2019-08 | |
| dc.date | 2020-05-11T17:34:17Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-14T20:17:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-14T20:17:36Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/95578 | |
| dc.identifier | issn:1666-5457 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7438661 | |
| dc.description | Este trabajo se ocupa de analizar dos fallos judiciales que postularon la imprescriptibilidad de los llamados delitos de corrupción. En ellos, paradójicamente, al pretenderse defender la institucionalidad y la democracia se desconocieron instituciones básicas que están en nuestra ley suprema desde el siglo XIX y que se remontan más atrás en la historia, como lo es el principio de legalidad destinado a preservar la libertad y los derechos fundamentales de la persona. Para sostener la imprescriptibilidad, las sentencias examinadas quebrantaron la regla de prohibición de analogía in malam partem; inobservaron y aplicaron erróneamente convenciones internacionales y leyes atingentes; interpretaron en forma incoherente la ley penal; utilizaron de manera laxa precedentes jurisprudenciales; e incurrieron en falacias lógicas en sus razonamientos. | |
| dc.description | This work analyzes two judicial decisions which postulated the non applicability of statutory limitations to corruption crimes. Paradoxically, whereas these resolutions pretended to defend institutionality and democracy, they left aside basic institutions that exist in our supreme law since the nineteenth century and even before in the history, such as the legality principle which was created to preserve the liberty and fundamentals human rights. In order to support non applicability of statutory limitations, the decisions broke the rule which prohibit the analogy in malam partem; they did not observe or wrongly applied international conventions and pertinent rules; they incoherently interpretated the criminal law; they used in an inadequate manner judicial precedents and they incurred in logical fallacious reasoning. | |
| dc.description | Especialización en Derecho Penal | |
| dc.description | Instituto de Derecho Penal | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | es | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) | |
| dc.subject | Ciencias Jurídicas | |
| dc.subject | Delitos | |
| dc.subject | Corrupción | |
| dc.subject | Imprescriptibilidad | |
| dc.subject | Principio | |
| dc.subject | Legalidad | |
| dc.subject | Crimes | |
| dc.subject | Corruption | |
| dc.subject | Iimprescriptibility | |
| dc.subject | Principle | |
| dc.subject | Legality | |
| dc.title | Afectación de la fórmula “nullum crimen nulla poena sine praevia lege” por dos fallos que postulan la imprescriptibilidad de los delitos de corrupción | |
| dc.title | Breach of the formula “nullum crimen nulla poena sine praevia lege” by two judicial resolutions which postulate the non applicability of statutory limitations to corruption crimes | |
| dc.type | Articulo | |
| dc.type | Articulo |