dc.creatorKlemens Augustinus Laschefski
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T19:08:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T17:23:34Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T19:08:42Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T17:23:34Z
dc.date.created2023-02-09T19:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-22
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48075/amb.v2i1.23299
dc.identifier2674-6816
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/49836
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-084X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6685618
dc.description.abstractThe rupture of two dams in Mariana (MG), 2015, and Brumadinho (MG), 2019, cost hundreds of lives and destroyed most of the Rio Doce and Paraopeba basins. These events are the climax of the disasters that began with environmental licensing and continued with the inefficient management of damage repair, causing even more social suffering. After the disasters, public institutions did not strengthen the regulatory framework but accelerated its flexibilization. As a result, mining companies are able to introduce the culture of neocoronelism into governance systems. In this way, companies have not only strengthened their interests in the face of victims' demands, but also the territorial control in areas affected by disasters through "hidden land grabbing".
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherIGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOLOGIA
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectBarragem de rejeito
dc.subjectDesastre
dc.subjectAcumulação por despossessão
dc.subjectMineração
dc.subjectRompimento de barragem
dc.subjectLicenciamento ambiental
dc.titleRompimento de barragens em Mariana e Brumadinho (MG): desastres como meio de acumulação por despossessão
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución