dc.contributorHeloisa Maria Murgel Starling
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3321652451642202
dc.contributorRenato Almeida de Moraes
dc.contributorAlexander Cambraia
dc.creatorNilo Sérgio de Melo Diniz
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-11T15:12:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T17:12:50Z
dc.date.available2023-06-11T15:12:42Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T17:12:50Z
dc.date.created2023-06-11T15:12:42Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-27
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/54771
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6685015
dc.description.abstractThe National Council of the Environment (CONAMA) was, at the same time, a product and a participant in the democratization process of Brazil, when it was created by Law 6.938/1981, with deliberative power and civil society participation. In almost three decades of continuous operation, the Council congregated government agencies, private sector and leaders of the environmental movement, who were denouncing the impacts of growth and expansion policy of the military government. The emergence of this movement, coupled with an international backdrop of concern about the effects of economic growth, leading to depletion and degradation of natural resources, spurred the implementation of the National Policy and System of Environment. Until they constituted environmental agencies, as IBAMA (1989), state and local agencies, and the Ministry of Environment (1992), the Conama guided and ruled on environmental policy, passing important resolutions up today. After the 1988 Constitution, there was a lowering of its powers, from responding to a Government Council. In addition, the environmental movement grew stronger with the new social and environmental trend, driven by movements such as the rubber tappers and affected people by hydroelectric dams. The UNCED-92 also played a role. The Council has proceeded to three major restructuring, with improvements in its procedures and composition, but without a balanced composition between the segments (NGOs, trade unions, indigenous people, scientific sector and private sector). The limits and advances promoted by this Council relate themselves to the evolution of participatory democracy in Brazil. They are also experiencing the arguments of Habermas democratic theory, confirming the communicative rationality and argumentative process as a way to collective construction of the common good and public interest, according the statements of their own advisers.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA POLÍTICA
dc.publisherCurso de Especialização em Democracia Participativa, República e Movimentos Sociais
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pt/
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectConselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (Conama)
dc.subjectPolítica Nacional do Meio Ambiente (PNMA)
dc.subjectSistema Nacional de Meio Ambiente (SISNAMA)
dc.subjectDemocracia participativa
dc.subjectSustentabilidade socioambiental
dc.subjectMovimento ambientalista.
dc.titleAmbiente e democracia participativa : a experiência do CONAMA
dc.typeMonografia (especialização)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución