dc.creatorAngélica Oliveira Adverse
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T21:26:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T17:07:33Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T21:26:18Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T17:07:33Z
dc.date.created2023-05-11T21:26:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-20
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.21814/2i.3164
dc.identifier2184-7010
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/53155
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-8819
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6684713
dc.description.abstractIn the 1920s, Dadaism works introduced the transformation of identity in countless photoperformances. Amidst transvestites and ambivalences of gender, artists problematized the performativity of self by the image of art. Hence, they made visible the conflict between identity, social roles and sexuality. Artists resumed the spiritual strategy of dandism to give visibility to the ambivalences of gender, subverting its original essence to introduce the Da Dandy aesthetic. By adopting an anarchic attitude, they crossed the border between anti-art and anti-fashion, celebrating anti-fashion by a praise to cultural decay. This article examines how Da Dandyism introduced, in the sphere of artistic fiction, a debate about taste and the experience of the beautiful in order to transfigure the aesthetic dimension of art.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherEBA - DEPARTAMENTO DE DESENHO
dc.publisherEBA - ESCOLA DE BELAS ARTES
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationRevista 2i: Estudos De Identidade E Intermedialidade
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectDa Dandy
dc.subjectAntimoda
dc.subjectContra-gênero
dc.subjectDandismo
dc.subjectDadaísmo
dc.titleDa dandy: antimoda & contra-gênero no dadaísmo
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución