dc.creatorJanaína Martins Bretas
dc.creatorMaria das Dores Graciano Silva
dc.creatorMariana Martins Gonzaga do Nascimento
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T20:16:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T16:27:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T20:16:30Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T16:27:01Z
dc.date.created2023-05-11T20:16:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v29.e3.a2017.pp235-240
dc.identifier2318-9312
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/53130
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2183-4365
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6682425
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to assess the implementation of adverse drug reactions (ADR) active surveillance strategies using computerized tools in a pharmacovigilance program of a large private hospital. The study was developed in three phases: I. implementation of the pharmacovigilance service (passive surveillance – intensified voluntary notification); II. active surveillance based on managerial reports of consumption of tracer drugs; III. active surveillance based on the content of forms that were filled out in the electronic system whenever a tracer drug was prescribed. All the ADR detected by the pharmacovigilance service for three and a half years (n = 542) were analyzed. The difference between the ADR/100 patients-day was analyzed by the comparison of two proportions, with a 5% significance level and power of 80%. The rate of ADR/100 patient-day identified in phase II and III (0.26 and 0.15, respectively), that is, after the implementation of computerized tools, was higher than the rate detected in phase I (0.10). The difference between the proportions was statistically significant. The majority of ADR identified presented moderate severity (69%), and an increase in this proportion was observed after the implementation of computerized tools. Regarding the causality assessment, 83.6% of the identified ADR was classified as “possible causality”. The implementation of active surveillance using computerized tools provided a statistically significant increase in the identification of ADR identification, reinforcing the need to intensify such pharmacovigilance strategies.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE PRODUTOS FARMACÊUTICOS
dc.publisherHCL - HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationInfarma: Ciências Farmacêuticas
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectFarmacovigilância
dc.subjectEfeitos colaterais e reações adversas relacionados a medicamentos
dc.subjectSistemas de notificação de reações adversas a medicamentos
dc.subjectPrescrição eletrônica
dc.titleAvaliação da implantação de busca ativa de reações adversas a medicamentos com auxílio de ferramentas informatizadas
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución