Colombia | Artículo de revista
dc.creatorSánchez Torres, Luis Darío
dc.creatorGalvis Castaño, Alberto
dc.creatorGandini, Mario Andrés
dc.creatorAlmario, Gloria
dc.creatorMontero, María Victoria
dc.creatorVergara, María Virginia
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T14:07:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T15:17:20Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08T14:07:06Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T15:17:20Z
dc.date.created2023-05-08T14:07:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-14
dc.identifier26249375
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10614/14704
dc.identifierUniversidad Autónoma de Occidente
dc.identifierRepositorio Educativo Digital UAO
dc.identifierhttps://red.uao.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6649678
dc.description.abstractRivers are essential for life, there is an indissoluble relationship between the natural system and the human system. Aquatic ecosystems guarantee ecosystem services to the human system, on the other hand, the human system makes use of these services and as a result of this generates effects on the natural system. However, an over use of these services could adversely impact the natural system. Therefore, the recovery of rivers is a priority for the planet. This work describes the progress of the Commission for the recovery of the upper Cauca river basin as a collaborative governance for sustainability and water security in the region. The upper basin is between the Colombian massif in the department of Cauca and the municipality of Cartago in Valle del Cauca. It is an important natural, cultural, social, and economic resource of Colombia, but it presents a continuous deterioration of water availability, both in quantity and quality, limiting its use for human consumption and a reduction in biodiversity. This work shows that the Commission for the upper Cauca river basin recovery is a process in development. The Commission is an instance made up of public and private entities, which arises from the failure of the current model of water resource management in Colombia. The central problem is how to transcend short-term planning in administrations to long-term planning based on a shared vision. Collaborative governance is proposed as a recovery of the Cauca river based on the concept of bioculturality and the rights of nature, due to the deep relationship of unity between nature and the human species. The need to achieve a shared vision is highlighted, to act under the watershed vision with all the actors involved. In addition, minimal and conclusive indicators must be defined that society recognizes and that motivates it to advance in the recovery. The aquatic ecosystems recovery is a priority, understanding that the investments required for achieving this goal can also significantly contribute to sustainability and water security for the region
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.relation13
dc.relation1
dc.relation4
dc.relationSánchez Torres, L.D., Galvis Castaño, A., Gandini, M. A., Almario, G., Montero, M.V., Vergara, M.V. (Abril 14, 2022). Commission for the upper Cauca River basin recovery, collaborative governance for sustainability and water security. Frontiers in water, vol. 4, pp. 1-13
dc.relationFrontiers in water
dc.relationAkhmouch, A., and Correia, F. N. (2016). The 12 OECD principles on water governance e when science meets policy. Util. Policy. 43, 14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.201 6.06.004
dc.relationBaldwin, C., and Ross, H. (2012). Bridging troubled waters: applying consensus- building techniques to water planning. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 217–234. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.578120
dc.relationBrower, A. L. (2016). Is collaboration good for the environment? Or, what’s wrong with the land and water forum? N. Z. J. Ecol. 40, 390–397. doi: 10.20417/nzjecol.40.42
dc.relationCorte Constitucional de Colombia (2016). Sentencia T-626, Magistrada Ponente, M.P. María Victoria Calle Correa. Obtenido de. Available online at: https://www. corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/T-626-16.htm (accessed February 16, 2021).
dc.relationErnstson, H., Barthel, S., Andersson, E., and Borgstrom, S. (2010). Scalecrossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 15:28. doi: 10.5751/ES-03692- 150428
dc.relationGalvis, A. (2019). Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control for the Municipal Water Cycle in a River Basin Context. Validation of the Three-Step Strategic Approach. Leiden: IHE Delft & Wageningen University and Research. doi: 10.18174/475836
dc.relationIngram, H. (2008). Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: A political and contextual approach. University of Arizona and University of California, Irvine, California, United States. Available online at: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/238658113
dc.relationKaiser, N. N., Feld, C. K., and Stoll, S. (2020). Does river restoration increase ecosystem services?. Ecosyst. Serv. 46, 101206. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101206
dc.relationMcCully, P. (2002). Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams. London: Zed Books
dc.relationMorandi, B., Kail, J., Toedter, A., Wolter, C., and Piégay, H. (2017). Diverse approaches to implement and monitor river restoration: a comparative perspective in France and Germany. Environ. Manag. 60, 931–946. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0923-3
dc.relationNijland, H. J., and Cals, M. J. R. (2000). “River restoration in Europe, practical approaches,” in Proceeding in Conference on River Restoration (Wagenningen).
dc.relationSamant S. R., and Brears R. C. (2017). “Urban waterfront revivals of the future,” in Greening Cities: Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements, eds P. Tan and C. Jim (Singapore: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_15
dc.relationSingh, A. P., and Dhadse, K. (2021). Economic evaluation of crop production in the Ganges region under climate change: a sustainable policy framework. J. Cleaner Prod. 278, 123413. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123413
dc.relationVojinovic, Z., and Huang, J. (2014). Unflooding Asia: The Green Cities Way. Vol. 13. Water Intelligence Online: IWA Publishing.
dc.relationYeboah-Assiamah, E., Muller, K., and Domfeh, K. A. (2018). Transdisciplinary approach to natural resource governance research: a conceptual paper. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. 29, 15–33. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-04-2016-0034
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Frontiers Media S.A., 2022
dc.titleCommission for the upper Cauca River basin recovery, collaborative governance for sustainability and water security
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución