dc.creatorÁvila-Batista, Ana Cristina
dc.creatorRueda, Fabián J. M.
dc.creatorHauck-Filho, Nelson
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30 10:21:14
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T15:42:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T16:58:26Z
dc.date.available2019-01-30 10:21:14
dc.date.available2023-01-23T15:42:47Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T16:58:26Z
dc.date.created2019-01-30 10:21:14
dc.date.created2023-01-23T15:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-30
dc.identifier10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.3
dc.identifier1909-9711
dc.identifier0123-9155
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/28428
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6648480
dc.description.abstractLa agresión autoritaria, la sumisión autoritaria y el convencionalismo son creencias sociales o actitudes que forman parte del llamado autoritarismo. El presente estudio da cuenta de la construcción y análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de una escala abreviada para evaluar tendencias autoritarias, la Escala de Actitudes frente al Autoritarismo (ESCAUT). En total, participaron 786 brasileños adultos con edades entre los 18 y 75 años, el 70.7 % eran militares. Inicialmente, se elaboraron 42 ítems para captar los principales tipos de creencias autoritarias, y los resultados de los análisis factoriales ordinales permitieron retener 20 ítems de moderados a altamente discriminatorios (cargas > .50) de dos factores latentes: autoritarismo moral y punitivo (a = .88) y autoritarismo sumiso (a = .89). Las curvas de información revelaron una amplia cobertura de la variable latente para ambas subescalas. Incluso, el instrumento fue capaz de discriminar participantes militares de no militares, con grandes efectos para las diferencias entre los grupos. En conclusión, la ESCAUT consiste en una escala abreviada de autoinforme que puede ser utilizada en la investigación de las principales actitudes autoritarias presentes en la población general. Al final se discuten las limitaciones del estudio.
dc.description.abstractAuthoritarian aggression, authoritarian submission, and conventionalism comprise beliefs or attitudes know as authoritarianism. In the present study, we report on the development and the test of the psychometric properties of a brief scale for the assessment of authoritarian tendencies, the Attitudes toward Authoritarianism Scale (ESCAUT). Participants in the study were 786 adults with ages ranging from 18 to 75 years, 70.7% military. An initial pool of 42 items written to capture the core features of authoritarianism was evaluated by specialists, and then answered by the participants. Results from ordinal factor analysis indicated 20 items with moderately to highly discriminative (factor loadings > .50) of two latent factors: Moral and punitive authoritarianism (a = .88), and submissive authoritarianism (a = .89). Test information curves revealed a broad coverage of the latent trait in both subscales. Moreover, the instrument could discriminate military from non-military participants, with large size differences. The ESCAUT is a brief self-report scale recommended for the assessment of the main features of authoritarianism in the general Latin American population. Limitations of the study are addressed.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1617/pdf1.2
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1617/2485
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1617/pdf1.3
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1617/2486
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1617/2462
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2019 : ACTA COLOMBIANA DE PSICOLOGÏA
dc.relation51
dc.relation1
dc.relation31
dc.relation22
dc.relationActa Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relationAdorno, T. H., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
dc.relationAltemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
dc.relationAltemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Diego, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
dc.relationAltemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationAsún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2015). Developing Multidimensional Likert Scales Using Item Factor Analysis: The Case of Four-point Items. Sociological Methods & Research, 0049124114566716-. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114566716
dc.relationBarros, T. S., Torres, A. R. R., & Pereira, C. (2009). Psico-USF (Impresso). PsicoUSF (Vol. 14). Universidade São Francisco. Retrieved from http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100006
dc.relationBrussino, S., & Etchezahar, E. (2013). Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 5(3), 495?521. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/5869902/Psychological_perspectives_in_the_study_of_authoritarianism
dc.relationCárdenas, M., & Parra, L. (2011). Adaptación y validación de la Versión Abreviada de la Escala de Autoritarismos de Derechas (RWA) en una muestra chilena. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 61?79. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098
dc.relationCarlson, H., Thayer, R. E., & Germann, A. C. (1971). Social Attitudes and Personality Differences among Members of Two Kinds of Police Departments (Innovative vs. Traditional) and Students. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62(4), 564. https://doi.org/10.2307/1141714
dc.relationDiáz-Lázaro, C. M., Castañeras, C., Ledesma, R. D., S., V., & Rand, A. (2014). Right-Wing Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, empathy, and materialistic value orientation as predictors of intergroup prejudice in Argentina. Salud & Sociedad, 5(3), 282?297. https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.5014.0003.00004
dc.relationDuckitt, J. (1993). Right-Wing Authoritarianism Among White South African Students: Its Measurement and Correlates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 553?563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712181
dc.relationDuckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715. doi: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
dc.relationDuncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and Gender Roles: Toward a Psychological Analysis of Hegemonic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41?49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231005
dc.relationDunwoody, P. T., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571?600. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168
dc.relationDuriez, B., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2012). Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Protective Factor Against or Risk Factor for Depression? European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 536?549. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.853
dc.relationDusso, A. (2017). Race and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: How Scoring High in Authoritarianism Does Not Necessarily Lead to Support for Right-Wing Candidates*. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 244?260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12302
dc.relationFromm, E. (1942). The fear of freedom. London: Routledge.
dc.relationFunke, F. (2005). The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195?218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x
dc.relationGatto, J., Dambrun, M., Kerbrat, C., & De Oliveira, P. (2009). Prejudice in the police: On the processes underlying the effects of selection and group socialisation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 252?269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.617
dc.relationGray, D., & Durrheim, K. (2013). Collective Rights and Personal Freedoms: A Discursive Analysis of Participant Accounts of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 34(4), 631?648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00932.x
dc.relationGregurovi?, M., Kuti, S., & Župari?-Ilji?, D. (2016). Attitudes towards Immigrant Workers and Asylum Seekers in Eastern Croatia: Dimensions, Determinants and Differences. Migracijske I Etnicke Teme, 32(1), 91?122. https://doi.org/10.11567/met.32.1.4
dc.relationHolgado?Tello, F. P., Chacón?Moscoso, S., Barbero?García, I., & Vila?Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153?166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
dc.relationJohnson, M. K., Labouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Carlisle, R. D. (2012). Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Mediate the Relationship Between Religious Fundamentalism and Attitudes Toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128?142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01622.x
dc.relationKossowska, M., Bukowski, M., & Hiel, A. Van. (2008). The impact of submissive versus dominant authoritarianism and negative emotions on prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 744?749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.022
dc.relationLaguna, L., Linn, A., Ward, K., & Rupslaukyte, R. (2010). An Examination of Authoritarian Personality Traits among Police Officers: The Role of Experience. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(2), 99?104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9060-0
dc.relationLarsson, M. R., Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2012). Right-wing authoritarianism is a risk factor of torture-like abuse, but so is social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 927?929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.015
dc.relationLaythe, B., Finkel, D., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2001). Predicting Prejudice from Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: A Multiple-Regression Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(1), 1?10. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00033
dc.relationLorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497?498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794
dc.relationLorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340?364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527
dc.relationManganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1223?1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013
dc.relationManoussaki, K., & Veitch, F. (2015). Ambivalent Sexism, Right Wing Authoritarianism and Rape Myth Acceptance in Scotland. International Journal of Gender & Women?s Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v3n1a9
dc.relationMavor, K. I., Louis, W. R., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 28?33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006
dc.relationMcFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 1004?1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004
dc.relationMoghaddam, F. M., & Vuksanovic, V. (1990). Attitudes and Behavior Toward Human Rights Across Different Contexts the Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Ideology, and Religiosity. International Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 455?474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247877
dc.relationMuthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus user?s guide. (Seventh Ed). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
dc.relationNuñes-Alacón, M., Moreno-Jiménez, M. P., & Moral-Toranzo. (2011). Modelo causal del prejuicio religioso. Anales de Psicologia, 27(3), 852?861.
dc.relationOnraet, E., & van Hiel, A. (2014). Are Right-Wing Adherents Mentally Troubled? Recent Insights on the Relationship of Right-Wing Attitudes With Threat and Psychological Ill-Being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 35?40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413514249
dc.relationPasquali, L. (2010). Testes referentes a construto: Teoria e modelo de construção. In L. Pasquali (Ed.), Instrumentação psicológica: Fundamentos e práticas (pp. 165-198). PortoAlegre: Artmed.
dc.relationPerrott, S. B. ., & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Attitudinal Differences Between Police Constables and Their Supervisors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 326?339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003009
dc.relationRubinstein, G. (2006). Authoritarianism Among Border Police Officers, Career Soldiers, and Airport Security Guards at the Israeli Border. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 751?761. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.6.751-761
dc.relationSeoane, J., & Garzón, A. (1991). Creencias sociales contemporáneas, autoritarismo y humanismo. Psicología Política, 5, 27?52. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2826354
dc.relationSilva, I. G. (2016). Democracia, autoritarismo e imperialismo: a centralidade da agenda conservadora na política brasileira. Revista de Políticas Públicas, 20, 237?244. https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v20nEp237-244
dc.relationTimmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209?20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
dc.relationVan Hiel, A., & De Clercq, B. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 33?50. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.702
dc.relationvan Vaerenbergh, Y., & Thomas, T. D. (2013). Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(2), 195?217. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds021
dc.relationVelicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321?327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557
dc.relationWalker, W. D., Rowe, R. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Authoritarianism and sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1036?1045. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1036
dc.relationWorden, R. E. (1995). Police officers? belief systems: a framework for analysis. American Journal of Police, 14(1), 49?81. https://doi.org/10.1108/07358549510152979
dc.relationZakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 863?872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsFabián J. M. Rueda - 2019
dc.sourcehttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1617
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectPrejudice
dc.subjectSocial groups
dc.subjectActitudes
dc.subjectPrejuicio
dc.subjectGrupos sociales
dc.subjectAtitudes
dc.subjectPreconceito
dc.subjectGrupos sociais
dc.titleConstrucción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo.
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución