dc.creator | Preterossi, Geminello | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-23T16:23:14Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-05T16:53:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-23T16:23:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-05T16:53:21Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.created | 2023-01-23T16:23:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | 2539-2239 | |
dc.identifier | 2389-8232 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29857 | |
dc.identifier | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1808 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6648181 | |
dc.description.abstract | ¿Qué es lo que mantiene el orden social? Esta pregunta está presente también en las concepciones postradicionales del vínculo social y, explícita o implícitamente, lleva a la relación entre poder y fuentes prepolíticas de la legitimidad. La secularización no significa liberarse de lo religioso. El hecho de que la política, con la modernidad, sustituya a la religión carga a la política misma de una función simbólica suplementaria. La teología económica no es un cambio de paradigma, no es la eliminación de la teología política y su sustitución con un modelo diverso. La teología económica es una teología política disfrazada. | |
dc.description.abstract | What holds together the social order? This question recurs even in post-traditional conceptions of the social bond and, explicitly or implicitly, leads to the relationship between power and pre-political sources of the legitimacy. Secularization is not liberation from the religious. The fact that politics, with modernity, occupy the space of religion charges politics itself of a supplementary symbolic function. The economic theology is not a paradigm change: neither the obliteration of political theology and its replacement with a different model. The economic theology is a disguised political theology. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Soft Power | |
dc.relation | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/1808/1648 | |
dc.relation | Núm. 1 , Año 2016 : Enero - Junio | |
dc.relation | 107 | |
dc.relation | 1 | |
dc.relation | 98 | |
dc.relation | 3 | |
dc.relation | Soft Power | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Geminello Preterossi - 2016 | |
dc.source | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1808 | |
dc.subject | Teología política | |
dc.subject | Teología económica | |
dc.subject | Secularización | |
dc.subject | Modernidad | |
dc.subject | Neoliberalismo | |
dc.subject | Political theology | |
dc.subject | Economic theology | |
dc.subject | Secularization | |
dc.subject | Modernity | |
dc.subject | Neoliberalism | |
dc.title | The power and the sacred : the impossible goodbye? . Between political theology and economic theology. | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |