Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo

dc.creatorOrozco-Vargas, Arturo Enrique
dc.creatorMercado-Monjardín, María del Rocío
dc.creatorGarcía-López, Georgina Isabel
dc.creatorVenebra-Muñoz, Arturo
dc.creatorAguilera-Reyes, Ulises
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17 20:36:30
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T16:36:18Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17 20:36:30
dc.date.available2023-01-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T16:36:18Z
dc.date.created2021-02-17 20:36:30
dc.date.created2023-01-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-17
dc.identifier10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
dc.identifier1909-9711
dc.identifier0123-9155
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/28482
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6647830
dc.description.abstractLa violencia en el noviazgo es un fenómeno multifactorial que requiere de estudios que profundicen respecto a los efectos que tienen las creencias culturales en el comportamiento tanto del agresor como de la víctima. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar la relación entre las creencias acerca de la violencia y la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo. Para ello, se contó con una muestra de 420 estudiantes de dos universidades públicas mexicanas que respondieron el Inventario de creencias acerca de la violencia hacia la esposa, el Inventario de conflictos en las relaciones de noviazgo, y un cuestionario de información sociodemográfica. Los datos recolectados fueron examinados por medio de un análisis de correlación canónica, y los resultados mostraron que el modelo en general fue estadísticamente significativo (Wilks λ = .654, F (20, 677.54) = 4.626, p < .05); que el tamaño del efecto del modelo general fue de .346, lo que indica que este explicó el 34.6 % de la varianza compartida por los dos conjuntos de variables; y que, específicamente en la primera función, el coeficiente de mayor magnitud fue el de la variable de justificación de la violencia (r2 s= 76.2; h2 = 90.0), seguido por la del apoyo que se le puede brindar a la víctima (r2 s = 57.1; h2 = 94.5).
dc.description.abstractDating violence is a multifactorial phenomenon that requires in-depth studies regarding the effects that cultural beliefs have on the behavior of both the aggressor and the victim. With this in mind, the objective of this research was to determine the relationship between beliefs about violence and the prevalence of dating violence. To this end, a sample of 420 students from two Mexican public universities answered the Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Violence, the Inventory of Conflicts in Dating Relationships, and a sociodemographic information questionnaire. The data collected were examined through a canonical correlation analysis, and the results showed that the overall model was statistically significant (Wilks λ = .654, F (20, 677.54) = 4.626, p < .05); that the effect size of the overall model was .346, indicating that it explained 34. 6 % of the variance shared by the two sets of variables; and that, specifically in the first function, the coefficient of greatest magnitude was that of the variable of justification of the violence (r2 s = 76.2; h2 = 90.0), followed by that of the support that can be given to the victim (r2 s = 57.1; h2 = 94.5).
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3755
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3618
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3770
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2021 : Volumen 24, número 1.
dc.relation166
dc.relation1
dc.relation154
dc.relation24
dc.relationActa Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relationAbrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perception of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
dc.relationBandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. En W. M. Kurtines y J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (pp. 71-129).
dc.relationErlbaum. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
dc.relationBybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 103-132. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1014376202459
dc.relationCalvete, E., & Cardeñoso, O. (2005). Gender differences in cognitive vulnerability to depression and behavior problems in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-1826-y
dc.relationCauffman, E., Feldman, S. S., Arnett, L. J., & Jensen, J. A. (2000). The (un)acceptability of violence against peers and dates. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(6), 652-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558400156003
dc.relationCava, M. J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Buelga, S., & Carrascosa, L. (2020). Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449
dc.relationCreswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. ª ed.). Sage publications.
dc.relationDarteh, E. K. M., Dickson, K. S., Rominski, S. D., & Moyer, C. A. (2020). Justification of physical intimate partner violence among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a multinational analysis of demographic and health survey data. Journal of Public Health, 33, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10389-020-01260-9
dc.relationDíaz-Aguado, M. J. (2003). Adolescencia, sexismo y violencia de género. Papeles del Psicólogo, 23(84), 35-44. http:// www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/resumen?pii=1053
dc.relationDíaz-Aguado, M. J., & Martínez, A. (2001). La construcción de la igualdad y la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer desde la educación secundaria. Instituto de la mujer.
dc.relationDurán, M., Moya, M., Megías, J. L., & Viki, G. T. (2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: the role of perpetrator’s benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 505-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-009-9676-7
dc.relationFernández-Antelo, I., Cuadrado-Gordillo, I., & Martín-Mora, G. (2020). Synergy between acceptance of violence and sexist attitudes as a dating violence risk factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145209
dc.relationFernández-Fuertes, A. A., Fuertes, A., & Pulido, R. F. (2006). Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja de los adolescentes. Validación del Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - versión española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6(2), 339-358. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?co digo=1983727&orden=65963&info=link
dc.relationFerrer-Pérez, V. A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Ramis-Palmer, M. C., & Navarro-Guzmán, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos. Anales de psicología, 22(2), 251-259. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo. oa?id=16722210
dc.relationFish, L. (1988). Why multivariate methods are usually vital. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21(3), 130-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07 481756.1988.12022895
dc.relationForbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., White, K. B., Bloesch, E., & AdamsCurtis, L. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexual or nonsexual betrayal of trust: effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52(3-4), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-005-1292-6
dc.relationFoshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., & Linder, G. F. (1999). Family violence and the perpetration of adolescent dating violence: Examining social learning and social control processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 331-342. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/353752
dc.relationFuringhetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. En G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen y G. Törner (Eds.). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39-57). Kluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relationGlick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491- 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
dc.relationGoodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Vankos, N., & Weinfurt, K. (2005). Women’s resources and use of strategies as risk and protective factors for reabuse over time. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 311-336. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273297
dc.relationHair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1984). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.
dc.relationHaj-Yahia, M., & Uysal, A. (2008). Beliefs about wife beating among medical students from Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 119-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10896-007-9134-7
dc.relationHargreaves, S., L. Vetten, V. Schneider, L. Malepe, L., & Fuller, R. (2006). Marriage is like sitting on red coals: A case study of domestic violence in four villages of the Moretele District, Tshwane metropole. Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
dc.relationHunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553-573. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246
dc.relationInstituto Mexicano de la Juventud. (2008). Encuesta nacional de violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo 2007. INEGI.
dc.relationLameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2002). Evaluación del sexismo moderno en los adolescentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 17(2), 119-127. https://doi. org/10.1174/021347402320007555
dc.relationLewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00042-2
dc.relationMahlstedt, D. L., & Welsh, L. A. (2005). Perceived causes of physical assault in heterosexual dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 11(4), 447-472. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273298
dc.relationMoya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., De Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent Sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1421- 1434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790
dc.relationOrozco, A. E., Nievar, M. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2012). Domestic violence in Mexico: Perspectives of Mexican Counselors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 751-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.43.5.751
dc.relationReitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 99-115. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/088626001016002001
dc.relationRey-Anacona, C. A. (2013). Prevalencia y tipos de maltrato en el noviazgo en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes. Terapia Psicológica, 31(2), 143-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-48082013000200001
dc.relationRivera, L., Allen, B., Rodríguez, G., Chávez, R., & Lazcano, E. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students. Preventive Medicine, 44(6), 477-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.020
dc.relationRusso, N. F., & Pirlott, A. (2006). Gender-based violence concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 178-205. https://doi. org/10.1196/annals.1385.024
dc.relationSakalli-Ugurlu, N., Glick, P., & Yalcin, Z. S. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, Belief in a Just World, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2
dc.relationSaunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2(1), 39-57. https://doi. org/10.1891/0886-6708.2.1.39
dc.relationShen, A. C.-T., Chiu, M. Y.-L., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066-1089. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260511424497
dc.relationSherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005) Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15327752jpa8401_09
dc.relationSugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338
dc.relationTabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6. ª ed.). Person Education.
dc.relationTang, C. S. K., Wong, D., & Cheung, F. M. C. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8(8), 968-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102400447096
dc.relationTemurtas, A. (2016). Canonical correlation analysis. En C. O. Guzeller (Ed.). Multivariate statistics for all (pp.101-112). Maya Academy Publication.
dc.relationThompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. En D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127- 146). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
dc.relationThompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Sage.
dc.relationThompson, B. (1991). A primer on the logic and use of canonical correlation analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24(2), 80-95. https://psycnet. apa.org/record/1991-32137-001
dc.relationTonsing, J. C., & Tonsing, K. N. (2019). Understanding the role of patriarchal ideology in intimate partner violence among South Asian women in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 62(1), 161-171. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0020872817712566
dc.relationWaltermaurer, E. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167-175. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1524838012447699
dc.relationWolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Pittman, A. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277-293. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277
dc.relationZink, T., Regan, S., Jacobson, C. J., & Pabst, S. (2003). Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 9(12), 1429-1441. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801203259231
dc.relationŽukauskienė, R., Kaniušonytė, G., Bergman, L. R., Bakaitytė, A., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2019). The role of social support in identity processes and posttraumatic growth: A study of victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260519836785
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsActa Colombiana de Psicología - 2021
dc.sourcehttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2799
dc.subjectDating violence
dc.subjectBeliefs
dc.subjectJustification of violence
dc.subjectSupport for the victim
dc.subjectPunishment of the perpetrator
dc.subjectViolencia en el noviazgo
dc.subjectCreencias
dc.subjectJustificación de la violencia
dc.subjectApoyo a la víctima
dc.subjectCastigo al perpetrador
dc.titleCreencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución