dc.creatorCavaliere, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T16:25:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T16:25:04Z
dc.date.available2019-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-01-23T16:25:09Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T16:25:04Z
dc.date.created2019-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.created2023-01-23T16:25:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifier10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.12
dc.identifier2539-2239
dc.identifier2389-8232
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/29959
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.12
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6647419
dc.description.abstractEl artículo analiza algunas etapas fundamentales en la batalla por los derechos de los hombres y de las mujeres afroamericanas en los Estados Unidos de América, evidenciando las dificultades a las que se enfrentaron, sobre todo como consecuencia de los prejuicios transversalmente difundidos en la sociedad. El artículo se concentra en la originalidad de las posiciones del feminismo negro, mostrando cuánto han sido menospreciadas y malentendidas sus batallas. A partir del texto de Angela Davis, Women, Race & Class, en el artículo se reflexiona sobre el alcance universalista de las reivindicaciones del feminismo hegemónico, y se propone la pregunta; ¿es posible llevar a cabo una lucha en nombre y por cuenta de todas las mujeres, creando un puente entre las diversas clases sociales, o, más aún, asumiendo que las mujeres sean una única clase?
dc.description.abstractThe article analyzes some fundamental stages in the battle for the rights of African-American men and women in the United States of America, highlighting the difficulties they faced, especially as a consequence of the prejudices transversally disseminated in society. The article focuses on the originality of black feminism positions, showing how much its battles have been disparaged and misunderstood. Based on the text by Angela Davis, Women, Race & Class, the article reflects on the universalistic claims of hegemonic feminism, and proposes the question; is it possible to carry out a struggle in the name and on behalf of all women, creating a bridge between the different social classes, or, even more, assuming that women are a single class?
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherSoft Power
dc.relationhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3530/3248
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2019 : Enero - Junio
dc.relation263
dc.relation1
dc.relation250
dc.relation6
dc.relationSoft Power
dc.relationDavis, A. (1971). Reflections on the Black Women’s Role in the community of Slaves. The black Scholar, 3(4), 2-15.
dc.relationDavis, A. (1974). An Autobiography. New York: International Publishers.
dc.relationDavis, A. (1981). Women, Race and Class. New York: Random House.
dc.relationStaples, R. (1970). The Myth of Black Matriarchy. The Black Scholar, 1(3-4), pp. 8-16.
dc.relationWertheimer, B. (1977). We Were There. The story of working Women in America. New York: Pantheon, Books.
dc.relationHernton, C. (1975). Sex and racism in America. New York: Grove Press.
dc.relationStein, G. (1970). Three Lives. New York: Vintage Books.
dc.relationBrownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will, Women and Rape. New York: Simon and Shuster.
dc.relationDouglass, F. (1895). Why is the Negro Lynched? En Foner P. S. The Life and the Writings of Frederick Douglass, 4, 498-499.
dc.relationBall, E. (1998). Slaves in the Family. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
dc.relationDunaway, W. A. (2003). The African-American Family in Slavery and Emancipation. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationCasadei, Th. (2013). Sarah Moore Grimké, Le radici bibliche dell’argomentazione femminista. En Grimké S. M, Poco meno degli angeli (pp. 5-15). Roma: Castelvecchieditore,.
dc.relationGordon, L. (1976). Woman’s body, Woman’s right. Birth Control in America. New York: Penguin Books.
dc.relationStanton, E. C., Anthony, S. B., Gage M. J. (Ed.). (1887). History of Woman Suffrage. Rochester: Charles Mann.
dc.relationMannucci, E. J. (2016). Baionette nel focolare. La Rivoluzione francese e la ragione delle donne, Milano: Franco Angeli.
dc.relationDe Gouges, O. (1791). Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne. En Les Droits de la femme, Paris.
dc.relationBadinter, E. (1989). Condorcet, Prudhomme, Guyomar: Paroles d’hommes (1790-1793). Paris: P.O.L.
dc.relationWollstonecraft, M. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects. London: Johnson.
dc.relationPersico G. (2012). Mary Wollstonecraft tra (auto)biografia e critica sociale: la sua narrativa e il Ritratto di William Godwin. Lugano: Agorà & Company.
dc.relationRauschenbusch-Clough, E. (1898). A Study of Mary Wollstonecraft and the Rights of Woman. London: Green & Company.
dc.relationKatsiaficas G. N. (1987). The Imagination of the New Left: A Global Analysis of 1968. Boston: South end Press.
dc.relationRedstockings. (1969). Redstockings Manifesto. En Schneir M. (Eds.), The Vintage Book of Feminism (pp. 127-129). London: Vintage.
dc.relationMacKinnon, C. (2006). Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationButler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
dc.relationCrenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 4, 139-167.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsAnna Cavaliere - 2019
dc.sourcehttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3530
dc.subjectFeminismo
dc.subjectRaza
dc.subjectClase social
dc.subjectFeminism
dc.subjectRace
dc.subjectSocial class
dc.title¿Son las mujeres una clase social? : reflexiones sobre la relación entre mujeres, raza y clase.
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución