“Quédate en casa (si puedes)”: empleo informal y COVID-19 en México

dc.creatorChapa Cantú, Joana Cecilia
dc.creatorSaldaña Villanueva, Carlos Emmanuel
dc.creatorLuna Domínguez, Edgar Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-23 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-03-23 00:00:00
dc.date.created2023-03-23 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2023-03-23
dc.identifier10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v15.n1.2023.6
dc.identifier2011-7663
dc.identifier2248-6046
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v15.n1.2023.6
dc.description.abstractEste artículo explora la relación entre el confinamiento residencial para reducir la propagación del virus COVID-19, visto como una política pública, y cómo afecta al sector laboral informal, así como la respuesta de los individuos a la pandemia en los estados de México. La formación de paneles para varios niveles de informalidad aplicada al panel vectorial autorregresivo (PVAR) muestra que la permanenciaen el hogar como política pública es más efectiva a medida que disminuye la informalidad. Además, la respuesta de los individuos a un aumento de la propagación de la pandemia depende del nivel de informalidad: para los estados con menores tasas de informalidad, los individuos responden a una mayor concentración del confinamiento residencial. Pero para los estados con un mayor nivel de informalidad, la evidencia no es significativa. El documento considera el papel de la informalidad en el desarrollo de una política pública eficaz.
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the relationship between residential confinement to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus, seen as a public policy, and how it affects the informal labor sector, as well as the responseof individuals to the pandemic in the states of Mexico. Forming panels for various levels of informality applied to panel vector auto-regressive (PVAR) shows that staying at home as public policy becomes more effective as informality decreases. In addition, the response of individuals to an increase in the spread of the pande-mic depends on the level of informality: for states with lower rates of informality, individuals respond to a higher concentration of residential confinement. But for states with a higher level of informality, the evidence is not significant. The paper considers the role of informality in the development of an effective public policy.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4287/4679
dc.relationhttps://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4287/4623
dc.relationhttps://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4287/4680
dc.relationNúm. 1 , Año 2023
dc.relation155
dc.relation1
dc.relation135
dc.relation15
dc.relationRevista Finanzas y Política Económica
dc.relationAbrigo, M. R. M., & Love, I. (2016). Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stata Journal, 16(3), 778-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600314
dc.relationAkaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21(1), 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532251
dc.relationAltamirano, Á., Azuarra, O., González, S., & Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). (2020). ¿Cómo impactará la COVID-19 al empleo?: Posibles escenarios para América Latina y el Caribe. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 7. https://publications. iadb.org/publications/spanish/document /Cómo_impactará_la_COVID-19_al_em-pleo_Posibles_escenarios_para_América_Latina_y_el_Caribe.pdf
dc.relationAndersen, M. (2020). Early evidence on social distancing in response to COVID-19 in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569368
dc.relationBanxico (2020). Reporte sobre las economías regionales julio-septiembre 2020. https://www.banxico.org.mx/publicaciones-y-prensa/reportes-sobre-las-economias-regionales/%7B8427BCB2-D8F2-C28A-8DD4-EB8DD9770681%7D.pdf
dc.relationBargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104316
dc.relationBloomberg (2020a). Coronavirus pandemic: Ranking the best, worst places to be. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-resilience-ranking/?utm_medium=social&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign =socialflow-organic&utm_content=business
dc.relationBloomberg (2020b). Inside Bloomberg’s covid resilience ranking - Bloomberg. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-24/inside-bloomberg-s-covid-resilience-ranking
dc.relationBrotherhood, L., Kircher, P., Santos, C., & Tertilt, M. (2020). An economic model of the Covid-19 epidemic: The importance of testing and age-specific policies. IZA Institute of Labor Economics - Discussion Paper Series, 13265, 1–71. www.RePEc.org
dc.relationBusso, M., Camacho, J., Messina, J., & Montenegro, G. (2021). Social protection and informality in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(11November). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259050
dc.relationCatherine, S., Miller, M., & Sarin, N. (2020). Relaxing household liquidity cons- traints through social security. Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104243
dc.relationChapa, J. (2020). Impacto Económico del COVI-19 en las regiones de México. Revista Ciencia UANL, 23(102). https://doi.org/10.29105/cienciauanl23.102-1
dc.relationCONAGUA. (2020). Servicio Meteorológico Nacional. https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/
dc.relationDingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
dc.relationEngle, S., Stromme, J., & Zhou, A. (2020). Staying at home: mobility effects of COVID-19. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565703
dc.relationEsquivel, G. (2020). Los impactos económicos de la pandemia en México. EconomíaUNAM, 17(51), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.22201/FE.24488143E.2020.51.543
dc.relationEsquivel, G., & Campos-Vázquez, R. M. (2020). Consumption and geographic mobility in pandemic times: Evidence from Mexico. Cepr Press Covid Economics, 38, 218-252.
dc.relationEstados Unidos Mexicanos (2020a). DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www. dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5589479&fecha=16/03/2020&print=true
dc.relationEstados Unidos Mexicanos. (2020b). DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5590914&fecha=31/03/2020&print=true
dc.relationFerraresi, M., Kotsogiannis, C., Rizzo, L., & Secomandi, R. (2020). “Lockdown” and institutions COVID-19. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports .
dc.relationGasca, N. C., Reyes-Garza, J., Lozano-Esparza, S., del Pino, P. O., Olivas-Martínez, A., Ulloa-Pérez, E., Garbuno-Inigo, A., & Arroyo, J. (2022). Effect of Mexico’s vaccination program on Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among older adults in Mexico City. Salud Pública de México, 64(4, jul-ago), 424-428. https://doi.org/10.21149/13402
dc.relationGausman, J., & Langer, A. (2020). Sex and gender disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health, 29(4), 465-466. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8472
dc.relationGobierno de México, (GobMx), & Secretaría de Salud, (SALUD). (2020). Coronavirus gob.mx. Gobierno de México (GobMx).
dc.relationGoogle LLC. (2020). Google COVID-19 community mobility reports. Https://www.Google.Com/Covid19/Mobility/ Accessed: <18 May 2020>.
dc.relationILO, I. L. O. (2020). COVID-19 and the world of work. ILO Monitor Fourth Edition.
dc.relationINEGI. (2020a). Banco de datos. Banco de Información Economica. https://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/
dc.relationINEGI. (2020b). Indicacadores de ocupación y empleo. Cifras oportunas durante enero del 2020. Febrero.
dc.relationINEGI. (2020c). Investigación - Estado de ánimo de los tuiteros. INEGI. https://www.inegi. org.mx/app/animotuitero/#/app/multiline
dc.relationKong, E., & Prinz, D. (2020). Disentangling policy effects using proxy data: Which shutdown policies affected unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104257
dc.relationLanger, A., Meleis, A., Knaul, F. M., Atun, R., Aran, M., Arreola-Ornelas, H., Bhutta, Z. A., Binagwaho, A., Bonita, R., Caglia, J. M., Claeson, M., Davies, J., Donnay, F. A., Gausman, J. M., Glickman, C., Kearns, A. D., Kendall, T., Lozano, R., Seboni, N., ... Frenk, J. (2015). Women and health: The key for sustainable development. The Lancet, 36(9999), 1165–1210. Lancet Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60497-4
dc.relationLeyva, A. G. (2020). Propuesta metodológica del indicador “Grado de Felicidad Local”, asociación de indicadores relativos a la felicidad, bienestar y estado de ánimo. Interconectando Saberes. https://doi.org/10.25009/is.v0i10.2663
dc.relationLoayza, N., & Pennings, S. M. (2020). Macroeconomic policy in the time of COVID-19: A primer for developing countries. World Bank Research and Policy Briefs, 147291. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-source-data ,
dc.relationLuque Zúñiga, B. G., Moreno Salazar Calderón, K. A. B., & Lanchipa Ale, T. M. (2021). Impactos del COVID-19 en la agricultura y la seguridad alimentaria. Centro Agrícola. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0253-57852021000100072
dc.relationLütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. New introduc- tion to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1
dc.relationMaloney, W., & Taskin, T. (2020). Determinants of social distancing and economic activity during COVID-19: A global view. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 9242. http://www.worldbank.
dc.relationMendoza Cota, J. E. (2019). COVID-19 y el empleo en México: impacto inicial y pronósticos de corto plazo. Contaduría y Administración, 65(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2020.3028
dc.relationMilani, F. (2020). COVID-19 Outbreak, social response, and early economic effects: A global VAR analysis of cross-country interdependencies. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094748
dc.relationMilani, F. (2021). COVID-19 outbreak, social response, and early economic effects: a global VAR analysis of cross-country interdependencies. Journal of Population Economics, 34(1), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00792-4
dc.relationMoreno Salazar Calderón, K. A. B. (2021). Seguridad alimentaria en tiempos de COVID-19: Una visión desde la cadena productiva de recursos hidrobiológicos. Revista Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina, 9(1). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S2308-01322021000100021&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
dc.relationMüller, S., & Rau, H. A. (2020). Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the corona crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 104322. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575633
dc.relationNarula, R. (2020). Policy opportunities and challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic for economies with large informal sectors. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(3), 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00059-5
dc.relationOECD. (2020). COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regional socioeconomic implications and policy priorities. OECD, 1–12. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-regional-socio-economic-implications-and-policy-priorities-93a64fde/
dc.relationOhnsorge, F., & Yu, S. (2022). The Long shadow of informality: challenges and policies. The Long Shadow of Informality: Challenges and Policies. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1753-3
dc.relationPeluffo, C., & Viollaz, M. (2020). Intra-Household Insurance in the Time of Covid-19: Lessons from Mexico.
dc.relationPiguillem, F., & Shi, L. (2020). Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing policies. CEPR Discussion Papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340226829
dc.relationRangel González, E., Llamosas-Rosas, I., Fonseca, F. J., Rangel González, E., Llamosas- Rosas, I., & Fonseca, F. J. (2021). Aislamiento social y el COVID-19 en las regiones de México. EconoQuantum, 18(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18381/EQ.V18I2.7227
dc.relationSims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
dc.relationTejedor Estupiñán, J. M. (2021). Vacunación y desarrollo en tiempos de la COVID-19. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, 13(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.14718/REVFINANZPOLITECON.V13.N1.2021.1
dc.relationTesta, P. F., Snyder, R., Rios, E., Moncada, E., Giraudy, A., & Bennouna, C. (2021). Who stays at home? The politics of social distancing in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9349100
dc.relationThe World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators | DataBank. DataBank.
dc.relationYilmazkuday, H. (2020). Stay-at-home works to fight against COVID-19: international evidence from Google mobility data. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571708
dc.relationZhu, D., Mishra, S. R., Han, X., & Santo, K. (2020). Social distancing in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis using the Stringency Index and Google community mobility reports. Journal of Travel Medicine, 2020, 1-3. https:// doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa125
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rightsCarlos Emmanuel Saldaña Villanueva, Joana Cecilia Chapa Cantú, Edgar Mauricio Luna Domínguez - 2023
dc.sourcehttps://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4287
dc.subjectCovid-19
dc.subjectstay-at-home
dc.subjectpanel VAR
dc.subjectinformal employment
dc.subjectMéxico
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectVar de panel
dc.subjectempleo informal
dc.subjectMéxico
dc.title“Quédate en casa (si puedes)”: empleo informal y COVID-19 en México
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución