dc.creator | Acuña, Ignacio | |
dc.creator | Zalazar-Jaime, Mauricio Federico | |
dc.creator | Michelini, Yanina | |
dc.creator | Ignacio-Guzmán, Juan | |
dc.creator | Godoy, Juan Carlos | |
dc.creator | Galarce, Ezequiel | |
dc.creator | Joireman, Jeffrey | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-20 14:18:07 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-23T15:44:04Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-05T15:56:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-20 14:18:07 | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-23T15:44:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-05T15:56:52Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-01-20 14:18:07 | |
dc.date.created | 2023-01-23T15:44:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-20 | |
dc.identifier | 10.14718/ACP.2020.23.1.16 | |
dc.identifier | 1909-9711 | |
dc.identifier | 0123-9155 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28511 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2020.23.1.16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6646650 | |
dc.description.abstract | La consideración de las consecuencias futuras se define como el grado en el cual las personas anticipan y son influenciadas por las potenciales consecuencias futuras de su comportamiento actual, y una herramienta muy utilizada para medirla es la Escala de Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras (CFC-14). Esta escala ha exhibido propiedades psicométricas adecua- das en varios idiomas y se encuentra conformada por dos factores: CFC-Inmediato (CFC-I, 7 ítems) y CFC-Futuro (CFC-F, 7 ítems). El objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas y la consistencia interna de la versión en español de la CFC-14 en una muestra argentina, además de identificar las evidencias de validez convergente con la Escala de Impulsividad y la invarianza en función del género y la edad de los participantes. Para esto, se evaluó mediante una encuesta online a 512 participantes (75.2 % mujeres) de 13 a 74 años (M = 30.8) y se realizó un AFC en el que se encontró un modelo de dos factores como aquel con mejor ajuste para una versión de la escala de 13 ítems (CFI = .961; TLI = .952; RMSEA = .064; IC 90 % = .054-.074; WRMR = 0.979). Específicamente, los pesos de regresión estandarizados (p ≤ .05) fueron de .50 a .66 para CFC-F y de .43 a .83 para CFC-I; los valores de confiabilidad compuesta fueron adecuados, con un ρ = .80 para CFC-F y un ρ = .82 para CFC-I; no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en función del sexo y la edad de los participantes, no obstante, hubo una invarianza progresiva entre estos grupos; y las correlaciones entre las subescalas de la Escala de Impulsividad (UPPPS-P) y la CFC-F fueron negativas y significativas, siendo llamativa la correlación negativa y moderada entre la falta de premeditación y la CFC-F (r = –.41). De este modo, la CFC-14 mostró propiedades psicométricas adecuadas en una muestra argentina, aunque se necesita de más estudios para determinar la robustez de estos resultados. | |
dc.description.abstract | Consideration of future consequences is the extent to which people anticipate and are influenced by the potential future consequences of their current behavior. A well-established tool to measure this behavior is the 14-item Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFC-14). The CFC-14 has shown appropriate psychometric properties in several languages. This scale comprises two factors: the CFC-Immediate (CFC-I, 7 items) and the CFC-Future (CFC-F, 7 items). The main goal of this study was to assess the psychometric properties and internal consistency of the CFC-14 Scale in Spanish, using an Argentine sample. A second goal was to determine its convergent validity with impulsivity, and determine differences and invariance across gender and age groups. Using a web-based survey, data were collected from 512 participants (75.2% women) aged 13-74 years (M = 30.8). CFA showed a two-factor model as the best solution for the 13-items version (CFI.961, TLI .952, RMSEA .064 90%IC .054/.074, WRMR 0.979). Standardized regression weights (p≤ .05) ranged from .50 to .66 for CFC-F and between .43 and .83 for CFC-I. Composite reliability was also adequate: CFC-F achieved ρ = .80 and CFC-I ρ = .82. There were no differences across gender and age, but there was a progressive invariance between these groups. The CFC-F and UPPS-P subscales correlations were negative and significant, highlighting the negative and moder- ate correlation between CFC-F and the lack of premeditation (r=-.41). Thus, CFC-14 has adequate psychometric properties in an Argentine population, although more studies are necessary to determine the robustness of these findings. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Católica de Colombia | |
dc.relation | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3149/3037 | |
dc.relation | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3149/3143 | |
dc.relation | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3149/3038 | |
dc.relation | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3149/3155 | |
dc.relation | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3149/3128 | |
dc.relation | Núm. 1 , Año 2020 : ACTA COLOMBIANA DE PSICOLOGÏA | |
dc.relation | 368 | |
dc.relation | 1 | |
dc.relation | 346 | |
dc.relation | 23 | |
dc.relation | Acta Colombiana de Psicología | |
dc.relation | Adams, J. (2012). Consideration of immediate and future con- sequences, smoking status, and body mass index. Health Psychology, 31(2), 260-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025790 | |
dc.relation | Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., & Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.006 | |
dc.relation | Banco Mundial. (2015). Mente, sociedad y conducta. Washington, D. C. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/leo-2014-6-es | |
dc.relation | Bruderer-Enzler, H. (2015). Consideration of future conse- quences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 618-643. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513512204 | |
dc.relation | Camus, G., Berjot, S., & Ernst-Vintila,A. (2014). Validation fran- çaise de l’échelle de prise en considération des conséquences futures de nos actes (CFC-14). Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27(1), 35-63. Recuperado de https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-socia le-2014-1-page-35.html | |
dc.relation | Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 863-882. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33770319.pdf | |
dc.relation | Dominguez-Lara, S. A., & Medrano, L. A. (2016). Invarianza factorial del Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnarie (CERQ) en universitarios limeños y cordobeses. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 89-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.ifce | |
dc.relation | Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory fac- tor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. doi: https://doi.org/2004-21445-005[pii]\r10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 | |
dc.relation | Gagnon, J., Daelman, S., Mcduff, P., & Kocka, A. (2013). UPPS Dimensions of Impulsivity Relationships with Cognitive Distortions and Childhood Maltreatment. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(1), 48-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000099 | |
dc.relation | Geers, A. L., Wellman, J. A., Seligman, L. D., Wuyek, L. A., & Neff, L. A. (2010). Dispositional optimism, goals, and engagement in health treatment programs. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 123-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9238-z | |
dc.relation | George, M., & Mallery, P. (2011). Descriptive Statistics. En S. Hartman (ed.), SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple guide and reference 18.0 update (pp. 95-104). Boston: Pearson. | |
dc.relation | Gick, M. (2014). An exploration of interactions between Conscientiousness and Consideration of Future Consequences on healthy eating. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 181-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.020 | |
dc.relation | Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis Multivariante (5. ª ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall. | |
dc.relation | Joireman, J., Balliet, D., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Schultz, J. (2008). Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguish- ing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 15-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.011 | |
dc.relation | Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual Differences in the Consideration of Future and (More) Immediate Consequences: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(5), 313-326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252 | |
dc.relation | Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future-Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy: Evidence from the Two- Factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272- 1287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362 | |
dc.relation | Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering future consequences. En L. Sanna & E. Chang (eds.), Judgments Over Time: The Interplay of Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors (pp. 82-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof | |
dc.relation | Mimura, C., & Griffiths, P. (2008). A Japanese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and equiva- lence assessment. BMC Psychiatry, 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.004 | |
dc.relation | Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33770318.pdf | |
dc.relation | Nigro, G., Cosenza, M., Ciccarelli, M., & Joireman, J. (2016). An Italian translation and validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 333-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.014 | |
dc.relation | Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2. ª ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. | |
dc.relation | Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Factor validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 405-413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598453 | |
dc.relation | Pilatti, A., Godoy, J. C., & Brussino, S. A. (2012). Adaptación de instrumentos entre culturas: ejemplos de procedimientos seguidos para medir las expectativas hacia el alcohol en el ámbito argentino. Trastornos Adictivos, 14(2), 58-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1575-0973(12)70045-4 | |
dc.relation | Pilatti, A., Lozano, O., & Cyders, M. (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale: A Rasch Rating Scale Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 10-21. doi: 10.1037/pas0000124 | |
dc.relation | Pilatti, A., Rivarola-Montejano, G., Lozano, O. M., & Pautassi, R. M. (2016). Relationship between impulsivity and alcohol consumption in Argentinean men and women. Quaderns de Psicologia, 18(1), 75. doi: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1329 | |
dc.relation | Raykov, T. (2012). Evaluation of latent construct correlations in the presence of missing data: a note on a latent variable modelling approach. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65(1), 19-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X498162 | |
dc.relation | Schafer, J. (1999). Multiple imputation: a primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/096228099671525676 | |
dc.relation | Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742- 752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742 | |
dc.relation | Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5. ª Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. | |
dc.relation | Toepoel, V. (2010). Is consideration of future consequen- ces a changeable construct? Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 951-956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.029 | |
dc.relation | Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Esteves, C., Vilares-Gomes, C., Ortuño, V., Gomes, C., & Ortuño, V. (2015). Portuguese Validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.5 | |
dc.relation | Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Martín, A., Esteves, C., Ortuño, V. E. C., & Joireman, J. (2017). Adaptación y Validación Inicial al Castellano de la Escala de Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 44(2), 5-15. doi: 10.21865/RIDEP44.2.01 | |
dc.relation | Verdejo-García, A., Lozano, Ó., Moya, M., Alcázar, M. Á., & Pérez-García, M. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the UPPS-P impulsive behavior scale: reliability, validity and association with trait and cognitive impulsivity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(1), 70- 77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903382369 | |
dc.relation | Yu, C., & Muthen, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA. | |
dc.relation | Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2015). Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. En M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine & W. van Beek (eds.), Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application: Essays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 17- 55). Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Ignacio Acuña - 2020 | |
dc.source | https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/3149 | |
dc.subject | Consideration of future consequences | |
dc.subject | Argentine population | |
dc.subject | Impulsivity | |
dc.subject | Psychometric properties | |
dc.subject | Confirmatory factor analysis | |
dc.subject | Consideración de las consecuencias futuras | |
dc.subject | Población argentina | |
dc.subject | Impulsividad | |
dc.subject | Propiedades psicométricas | |
dc.subject | Análisis factorial confirmatorio | |
dc.title | Validación argentina de la escala de consideración de las consecuencias futuras (CFC-14). | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |