dc.creatorVillani, Massimo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T16:25:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T15:56:34Z
dc.date.available2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-01-23T16:25:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T15:56:34Z
dc.date.created2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.created2023-01-23T16:25:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.11
dc.identifier2539-2239
dc.identifier2389-8232
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/29979
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.11
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6646644
dc.description.abstractLa actualidad se desarrolla en una dimensión medial, en la cual, es decir, lo real expresa sí mismo, sin referirse a nada. El del medium es un espacio espurio, opacado por las incrustaciones cognitivas y libidinales que los sujetos dejan en sus relaciones. La política, en la fase neoliberal, se consuma totalmente en este contexto que no tiene conexiones con hechos que sean estables, separados de las vicisitudes humanas. A partir de algunas de las reflexiones de Hannah Arendt sobre el carácter relacional de la verdad, es posible pensar en la praxis política en este contexto estrictamente post-fundacional. Con Jacques Rancière, luego, se verá que lo real, para ser pensado, se tiene que facer ficción: la política es una disputa sobre la ficción del espacio común, sobre cómo se imagina su configuración material y simbólica. Pero fingir la igualdad de cada uno con todos significa practicarla.
dc.description.abstractActuality works in a medial dimension, in which the real only expresses itself, without referencing anything else. That of medium is a spurious space, loaded with cognitive and libidinal stains that the subjects leave behind in their relationships. Politics, in the neoliberal period, wears itself out in this context that has no links with stable facts, that is not shielded from human affairs. Starting from some of Hannah Arendt’s considerations about the relational character of truth, it is possible to think of political praxis in this rigorously post-foundational context. With Jacques Rancière, we will then observe how the real, in order to be thought, needs to be turned into fiction: politics is a dispute about fiction of the common space, about how its material and symbolic configuration is imagined. But faking equality of anyone with everyone means in fact practicing it.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSoft Power
dc.relationhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3569/3269
dc.relationNúm. 2 , Año 2019 : Julio - Diciembre
dc.relation205
dc.relation2
dc.relation188
dc.relation6
dc.relationSoft Power
dc.relationArendt, H. (1968). Truth and Politics. In Between Past and Future. Eight Excercises in Political Thought (pp. 227-264). New York: Viking Press.
dc.relationArendt, H. (1973). The Origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2006). Mimesis e aeisthesis. Ripensando la dimensione estetica della politica. Napoli: ESI.
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2006). Il governo delle vite. Biopolitica ed economia. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2010). Prefazione, in di J. Butler, E. Laclau, E. Laclau, Dialoghi sulla sinistra. Contingenza, egemonia, universalità (pp. V- XXXII). Bari: Laterza.
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2013). Politica. Rappresentazioni e tecniche di governo. Roma: Carocci.
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2013b). Immaginario, immaginazione e politica: tracce di una genealogia, in Cosmopolis. Rivista di Filosofia e Teoria Politica, 1-2. Retrieved from: https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero=IX22013&id=1
dc.relationBazzicalupo, L. (2016). Critica senza criterio, senza giudizio né legge. Dal decostruzionismo a Deleuze e Foucault. Filosofia Politica, 3, 487-505.
dc.relationBaudrillard, J. (1981), Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Galilée.
dc.relationBlanchot, M. (1949). La part du feu. Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relationBlanchot, M. (1983). La communauté inavouable. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
dc.relationBoltanski L. & È. Chiapello (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relationCacciatore, F.M. (2019). Il momento populista. Ernesto Laclau in discussione. Milano: Mimesis.
dc.relationCrouch, C. (2001). The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
dc.relationCuthbertson, A. (2019). Elon Musk’s Neuralink plans to hook human brains directly to computers. In Indipendent, July 17 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/elon-musk-neuralink-brain-computer-transhumanism-threads-a9007756.html
dc.relationDebord, G. (1996). La société du spectacle. Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relationDe Carolis, M. (2017). Il rovescio della libertà. Tramonto del neoliberalismo e disagio della civiltà. Macerata: Quodlibet.
dc.relationFerrari F. & J.-L- Nancy (2002), Nus sommes: la peau des images. Bruxelles: Gevaert.
dc.relationFerraris, M. (2011). Ricostruire la decostruzione: Cinque saggi a partire da Jacques Derrida. Milano: Bompiani.
dc.relationFerraris, M. (2012). Bentornata realtà: Il nuovo realismo in discussione. Torino: Einaudi.
dc.relationFerraris, M. (2017). Postverità e altri enigmi. Bologna: Il Mulino.
dc.relationFoucault, M. (2001). Nietzsche, la généalogie, l’histoire. in M. Foucault, Dits Ecrits tome II, 1976-1988(pp. 1004-24). Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relationFoucault, M. (2001b). Le «non» du père, in M. Foucault, Dits et Ecrits, tome 1: 1954-1975 (pp. 189-203). Paris: Gallimard.
dc.relationFoucault, M. (2008). Le Gouvernement de soi et des autres. Cours au Collège de France. 1982-1983. Paris: Le Seuil.
dc.relationFoucault, M. (2012). Le courage de la vérité. Paris: Puf.
dc.relationFraser, N. (2017). The End of Progressive Neoliberalism. In Dissent Magazine, January 2, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/progressive-neoliberalism-reactionary-populism-nancy-fraser
dc.relationLacoue-Labarthe P. & J-.L Nancy (1991). Le mythe nazi. Paris: L’aube.
dc.relationMarchart, O. (2007). Post-Foundational Political Thought_ Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
dc.relationMcLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge and Kegan.
dc.relationMontani, P. (2014). Tecnologie della sensibilità. Estetica e immaginazione interattiva. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
dc.relationNancy, J.-L. (2002). La création du monde ou la mondialisation. Paris: Galilée.
dc.relationNancy, J.-L. (2011). De la struction, in A. Barrau, J.-L. Nancy, Dans quels mondes vivons-nous? (pp.79-104). Paris: Galilée.
dc.relationPutnam, H. (2005). Ethics without Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relationRancière, J. (1981). La Nuit des prolétaires. Archives du rêve ouvrier. Paris: Fayard.
dc.relationRancière, J. (1995). La Mésentente. Politique et philosophie. Paris: Galilée.
dc.relationRancière, J. (2000). Le partage du sensible. Paris: La Fabrique.
dc.relationRancière, J. (2001). L’inconscient esthétique. Paris: Galilée.
dc.relationRancière, J. (2008). Le spectateur émancipé. Paris: La Fabrique.
dc.relationRancière, J. (2014). Le fil perdu. Essai sur la fiction moderne. Paris: La Fabrique.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsMassimo Villani - 2019
dc.sourcehttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3569
dc.subjectRancière
dc.subjectArendt
dc.subjectMedialidad
dc.subjectFicción
dc.subjectVerdad
dc.subjectCoexistencia
dc.subjectRancière
dc.subjectArendt
dc.subjectMediality
dc.subjectFiction
dc.subjectTruth
dc.subjectCoexistence
dc.titleFiction, truth, politics : the aesthetical dimension of actuality, from arendt to rancière.
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución