Hacia una mejor comprensión de la decoherencia desde una perspectiva general

dc.contributor0000-0002-4531-7461
dc.creatorFortín, Sebastián
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:08:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T15:07:58Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:08:04Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T15:07:58Z
dc.date.created2021-11-03T16:08:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.identifier0124-4620
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6285
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1695
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6645103
dc.description.abstractEl trabajo se propone presentar un enfoque de la decoherencia cuántica más general que el enfoque tradicional de la decoherencia inducida por el entorno (environment-induced decoherence) formulado por Zurek y sus colaboradores. Este nuevo enfoque, que viene desarrollándose en diversas publicaciones de nuestro grupo, adopta la perspectiva del sistema cerrado completo, sistema más entorno, y se basa en el análisis de la evolución temporal de los valores medios de los observables de dicho sistema cerrado. Al unificar la decoherencia inducida por el entorno y algunas propuestas alternativos, este nuevo enfoque facilitaría la elucidación del concepto de decoherencia desde una perspectiva general
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia
dc.relationRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 24, 2012, 65-82.
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1695
dc.relationAdler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34 (2003): 135-142.—. Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
dc.relationBacciagaluppi, G & Hemmo, M.. “Making sense of approximate decohe-rence”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1 (1994): 345-354.—. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27 (1996): 239-277.
dc.relationBonifacio, R., Olivares, S., Tombesi, P. & Vitali, D. “Model-independent approach to nondissipative decoherence”. Physical Review A, 61 (2000): 053802.
dc.relationBub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
dc.relationCasati, G. & Chirikov, B. “Quantum chaos: unexpected complexity”. Physica D, 86 (1995): 220-237.
dc.relationCasati, G. & Prosen, T. “Quantum chaos and the double-slit experiment”. Physical Review A, 72 (2005): 032111.
dc.relationCastagnino, M. & Fortin, S. “Predicting decoherence in discrete models”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50 (2011): 2259-2267.
dc.relationCastagnino, M., Fortin, S., Laura, R. & Lombardi, O. “A general theore-tical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems”. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25 (2008): 154002.
dc.relationCastagnino M. & Lombardi, O. “The self-induced approach to decoherence in cosmology”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42 (2003): 1281-1299.—. “Self-induced decoherence: a new approach”. Studies In History and Philo-sophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35 (2004): 73-107.—. “Self-induced decoherence and the classical limit of quantum mechanics”. Philosophy of Science, 72 (2005a): 764-776.—. “Decoherence time in self-induced decoherence”. Physical Review A, 72 (2005b): 764-776.
dc.relationDiosi, L. “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics”. Physics Letters A, 120 (1987): 377-381.
dc.relationElby, A. “The «decoherence» approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philo-sophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994.
dc.relationFord, G. W. & O’Connell, R. F. “Decoherence without dissipation”. Physics Letters A, 286 (2001): 87-90.
dc.relationFrasca, M. “General theorems on decoherence in the thermodynamic limit”. Physics Letters A, 308 (2003): 135-139.
dc.relationGambini, R. & Pulin, J. “Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics”. Foundations of Physics, 37 (2007): 1074-1092.
dc.relationHealey, R. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. To p o i, 14 (1995): 55-65.
dc.relationHeisenberg, W. “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43 (1927): 172-198. Versión inglesa: “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mecha-n i c s”. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
dc.relationJoos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems.Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E.
dc.relationJoos, C. Kiefer & I.-O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2000. Lecture Notes in Physics 538.
dc.relationKiefer, C. & Polarski, D. “Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?”. Advanced Science Letters, 2 (2009): 164-173.
dc.relationLeggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan P a u l , 19 8 7
dc.relationLombardi, O. & Vanni, L. “Medición cuántica y decoherencia: ¿qué medimos cuando medimos?”. Scientiae Studia,8 (2010): 273-291
dc.relationMilburn, G. J. “Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics”. Physical Review A, 44 (1991): 5401-5406.
dc.relationPaz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the transi-tion from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information: Quantum Computation, Communication, Decoherence and All That. Ed. D. Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002.
dc.relationPenrose, R. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
dc.relationPessoa Jr., O. “Can the decoherence approach help to solve the measurement problem? ”, Synthese, 113 (1998): 323-346.
dc.relationSchlosshauer, M. “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpre-tations of quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76 (2004): 1267-1305.—. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.
dc.relationSicardi, A. C., Abal, G., Siri, R., Romanelli, A. & Donangelo, R. “Intrinsic decoherence and irreversibility in a quasiperiodic kicked rotor”, arXiv:quant-ph/0308162, 2003.
dc.relationVon Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Trad. R. T. Beyer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, [1932] 1996.
dc.relationZeh, D. “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory”, Founda-tions of Physics, 1 (1970): 69-76.
dc.relationZurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?”, Physical Review D, 24 (1981): 1516-1525.—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”, Physical Review D, 26 (1982): 1862-1880.—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”, Physics Today, 44 (1991): 36-44.—. “Preferred sets of states, predictability, classicality and environment-induced decoherence”. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry. Eds. J. J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader & W. H. Zurek, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75 (2003): 715-776.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.subjectDecoherencia cuántica
dc.subjectDecoherencia inducida por el entorno
dc.subjectSistema cerrado
dc.titleHacia una mejor comprensión de la decoherencia desde una perspectiva general


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución