dc.contributor0000-0002-3612-8167
dc.creatorAlemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T16:04:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T14:51:35Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T16:04:48Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T14:51:35Z
dc.date.created2021-11-03T16:04:48Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01
dc.identifier0124-4620
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6278
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1658
dc.identifierinstname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6641922
dc.description.abstractEl carácter fundamentalmente probabilista de la teoría cuántica cuestionó el realismo como filosofía básica de la ciencia, si bien ciertas interpretaciones instrumentalistas podrían no amenazar por sí solas la existencia de un mundo exterior e independiente de nuestra conciencia. La falta de un valor definido para tales magnitudes antes de la medición alentó la suposición de que tales valores “no existen” antes de la medida. Una reinterpretación de nuestras ideas sobre las magnitudes físicas, considerándolas formal-mente representadas por conjuntos de valores en lugar de valores numéricos concretos, ayudaría a disipar toda sombra de irrealidad física.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia
dc.relationRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 25, 2012, 61-82.
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1658
dc.relationAlbert, David & Loewer, Barry. “Wanted dead or alive: two attempts to solve Schrödinger’s paradox”, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association1 (1990): 277-285.
dc.relationÁlvarez-Galindo, Gabriel & García-Alcaine, Guillermo. “Localidad einstein-iana y mecánica cuántica”. Revista Española de Física 19.1 (2005): 43-50.
dc.relationAspect, Alain; Dalibar, Jean & Roger, Gerard. “Experimental tests of Bell`s inequalities using time-varying analyzers”. Physiscal Revew Letters 49 (1982): 1084-1087.
dc.relationBahns, Dorothea; Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Piacitelli, Gherardo. “Ultraviolet Finite Quantum Field Theory on Quantum Space-t i m e ”. Commun. Math. Phys. 237.1-2 (2003): 221-241.
dc.relationBell, John S. Lo decible y lo indecible en mecánica cuántica. Madrid: Alianza, 199 0.
dc.relationBene, Gyula. & Dieks, Dennis. “A perspectival version of the modal inter-pretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior”, Foundations of Physics 32 (2002): 645-671.
dc.relationBerkovitz, Joseph & Hemmo, Meir. “Can modal interpretations of quantum mechanics be reconciled with relativity?”. Philosophy of Science 72 (2005): 789-801.
dc.relationBirkhoff, Garrett & Von Neumann, John. “The Logic of Quantum Me c h a n i c s”. Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936): 823-843.
dc.relationBohm, David & Hiley, Basil. The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Inter-pretation of Quantum Theory. Londres: Routledge, 1993.
dc.relationBub, Jeffrey. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1997
dc.relationBunge, Mario. Foundations of Physics, New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1967a.—. Quantum theory and reality. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967b.—, ed. Problems in the foundations of physics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971.—. The Furniture of the World. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel, 1977.—. Filosofía de la Física. Barcelona: Ariel, 1982.—. Epistemología. Barcelona: Ariel, 1985.
dc.relationBusch, Paul. “Can «Unsharp Objectification» Solve the Quantum Measure-ment Problem?”. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37.1 (1998): 241-247.
dc.relationBusch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka. & Mittelstaedt, Peter. The Quantum Theory of Measurement. 2ª ed. Berlin: Springer, 1996.
dc.relationBusch, Paul. & Shimony, Abner. “Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem for unsharp observables”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27.4 (1996) 397- 40 4.
dc.relationCabello, Adán; Estebaranz, José M & Garcia, Guillermo. “Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: A proof with 18 vectors”. Physics Letters.A 212 (1996): 183 -187.
dc.relationCassinello, Andrés. “La indeterminación en mecánica cuántica”. Revista de la Real Sociedad Española de Física 21.4 (2007): 42-53.
dc.relationD’Espagnat, Bernard. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton Univer-sity Press, 2006.
dc.relationDickson, Michael. “Wavefunction tails in the modal interpretation”. Proceed-ings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 366-376.
dc.relationDoplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Roberts, John E. “The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields”. Commun. Math. Phys. 172.1 (1995): 187-220
dc.relationEinstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris & Rosen, Nathan. “Can quantum-mechan-ical description of reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780
dc.relationElby, Andrew. “Why «modal» interpretations of quantum mechanics don’t solve the measurement problem”. Foundations of Physics Letters 6 (1993): 5 -19.
dc.relationFock, Vladimir A. “Remarks on Bohr’s article on his discussions with Einstein”. Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 66 (1958): 599-607
dc.relationGleason, Andrew M. “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6 (1957): 885-893.
dc.relationGottfried, Kurt. “Does Quantum Mechanics Carry the Seeds of its own Destruction?” Quantum Reflections. Eds. D. Amati D, J. Ellis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 165-185.
dc.relationHalvorson, Hans & Clifton, Rob. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theory?”. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): 1-28.
dc.relationHeisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.
dc.relationHiley, Basil J. “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”. Contemporary Physics18 (1977): 411-414.
dc.relationJammer, Max. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. An Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley & S on s, 1974.—. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-H i l l, 1996 .
dc.relationJauch, Josef M & Piron, Constantin. “Can Hidden variables be Excluded in Quantum Mechanics?”. Helvetica Physica Acta 36 (1963): 827-837.
dc.relationKochen, Simon & Specker, Ernst. “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 5 9 - 8 7.
dc.relationMackey, George. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin, 1963
dc.relationMittelstaedt, Peter. Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975.—. “The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern Phy s i c s”. Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Ed. P. Parrini. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 169-181.—. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
dc.relationMusgrave, Alan. “Discussion: Realism About What?”. Philosophy of Science 59 (1992): 691-697.
dc.relationOmelyanovskij, Mykhailo E; Tagliagambe, Silvano & Geymonat, Ludovico. L’ interpretazione Materialistica della Mecánica Quantistica. Milán: Feltrineli, 1972 .
dc.relationPopper, Karl. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10 (1959): 25-42.
dc.relationPusey, Matthew; Barrett, Jonathan & Rudolph, Terry. “The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically”. Quantum Physics (2011). En línea. < ht t p://x x x .l a n l.g ov/a b s /1111.332 8v1>.
dc.relationRescher N. Scientific Realism. A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
dc.relationSchroedinger, Erwin. “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935): 807-812; 823-838; 844-849
dc.relationStapp, Henry P. “S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory”, Physical ReviewD 3 (1971): 1303-1320.
dc.relationan Fraassen, Bas. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Synthese 29 (1974) 291-309. —. Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991
dc.relationVon Neumann, John. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1932
dc.relationWheeler, John A & Zurek, Wojciech H., eds. Quantum Theory and Measure-ment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.subjectObjetividad
dc.subjectFunción
dc.subjectMedida
dc.subjectMagnitud
dc.subjectDistribución
dc.titleRealismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución