masterThesis
Metacognitive learning strategies: their influences on vocabulary learning through a webquest
Fecha
2013-09-19Registro en:
Alemi, M., and Tayebi, A., (2011). The influence of incidental and intentional vocabulary
acquisition and vocabulary strategy use on learning L2 vocabularies. JLTR Journal of
Language Teaching and Research, 2(1)
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning.
ERIC Digest. Education Resources Information Center
Arnold, J., & Brown, D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in
language learning (pp. 142-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer assisted language learning, New
York: Longman.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., and Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust
vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press
Cekada, T. (2011). Conducting an effective needs assessment. Professional Safety– The
Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers, 56, 28-34
Chamot, A. U., and O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The Cognitive academic language learning
approach (CALLA): A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary
School Journal, 96 (3): 259-273.
Cook, L. K., and Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning
from prose. In M. Pressley, & J. Levin (Eds.).Cognitive strategy research (pp. 14-27 ).
New York: Springer Verlag.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Dodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: A technique for internet-based learning. Distance Educator,
1(2), 10-13.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson education.
Limited.
Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of
educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research Findings and
Recommendations Prepared for the American Philosophical Association (ERIC
document no. ED 315–423). ERIC, Washington, DC.
Goodfellow, R. (1994). Design principles for computer-aided vocabulary learning. Computers
& Education, 23, 53-62.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Higgs, J. (1988). Planning learning experiences to promote autonomous learning. In D. Baud
(Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 40-58). London: Kogan
Page University Press
Harris, V. (2003). Adapting classroom-based strategy instruction to a distance learning
context. TESL-Electronic Journal, 7(2), 1-19.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Award for distinguished teaching in psychology. American
Psychologist, 53, 879-881.
Halpern, D. F. (2003a). The “how” and “why” of critical thinking assessment. In D. Fasko
(Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory and practice.
Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Halpern, D. F. (2003b). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th
ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in language classrooms. Oxford: Oxford
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hurd, S. (2008) Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T.
Lewis (E
ds) Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 218-236). Bristol: Multilingual
Matters.
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA
Yearbook, 5, 223–250
Luckey, G. M. (2003). Critical thinking in colleges and universities: A model. In D. Fasko
(Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 253–271). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
MacLean, M. S., and Mohr, M. (1999). Teacher- researchers at work. Berkeley, CA: National
Writing Project, p. 56-66
March, T. (2003). The learning power of WebQuests. Educational Leadership, 61 (4), 42-48
Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual Education & Content and Language Integrated Learning. Paris:
International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in
the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.
Marsh, D. (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages, Finland,
University of Jyväskylä.
McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A Reconceptualization. In
D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
(pp.575-596). New York: Macmillan
Moir, J., and Nation, P. (2008). Vocabulary and good language learners. Lessons from good
language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mukoroli, J. (2011). Effective vocabulary teaching strategies for academic purposes ESL
classroom. AYMAT Individual Thesis / SMAT IPP Collection. Paper 501.
Nagy, W. E., and Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.
D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269-284).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of
the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
(NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development
Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Nation, P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian. EFL Journal, 7(3), 47-54.
Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc,
Pub.
Nunan, D. (1990). Action research in the language classroom. In J. Richards & D. Nunan
(Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 62-8). Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in language learning. Paper presented at plenary presentation,
ASOCOPI, Colombia
Nunan, D., and Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A
comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New
York: Newbury House
Oxford, R. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and
ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 18-2
Oxford, R., and Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies
worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language
Learning. System, 23(2), 153-175.
Richards, J. C. (1974). Word lists: problems and prospects. RELC Journal, 5, 69-84.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.),
Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching
Research, 12, 329–363
Schraw, G. (1989). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26 (1-
2) 113-125
Sims, R.R., and Sims, S.J. (1995). The importance of learning styles: Understanding the
implications for learning, course design, and education. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press.
Stahl, S. A. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (And what to do to make
vocabulary an integral part of instruction). In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.),
Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum
Swartz, R. (2003). Infusing critical and creative thinking into instruction in high school
classrooms. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 293–310).
Cresskill: Hampton Press
Tang E. and H. Nesi. (2003). Teaching vocabulary in two Chinese classrooms: Intensive and
extensive exposure in Hong Kong and Guangzhou. Language Teaching Research.
7(1), 65-97.
Taylor, L. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Herefordshire, UK: Prentice Hall
International
Zimmerman, C. B. (1994). Self-selected reading and interactive vocabulary instruction:
Knowledge and perceptions of word learning among L2 learners. Ph.D. dissertation,
Los Angeles: University of Southern California
255565
TE06072
Autor
Álvarez Ayure, Claudia Patricia
Institución
Resumen
Esta investigación-acción examinó cómo el uso de estrategias metacognitivas, a través de la webquest llamada "El mundo en nuestras manos" en la cual los estudiantes desarrollaron tareas complementarias a la instrucción de clase, influenciaron el aprendizaje de vocabulario. Treinta estudiantes con nivel A1 según el Marco Común Europeo de Referencia para las Lenguas (MCERL) de octavo grado de dos colegios públicos colombianos quienes fueron entrenados en el uso de las estrategias metacognitivas y de vocabulario, participaron en este estudio. Seis intervenciones fueron diseñadas e implementadas siguiendo el modelo de Aprendizaje de Lenguaje Académico y de Contenido (CALLA) – y Aprendizaje de una Lengua Asistido por Computador (CALL). Los datos recolectados sugirieron que el uso de las estrategias metacognitivas en ambientes CALL influenció positivamente el aprendizaje de vocabulario, ya que promovieron la conciencia y autonomía de los participantes. Los hallazgos además indicaron que dichas estrategias ayudaron a obtener mejores resultados en su proceso de aprendizaje, ya que ellos adquirieron conciencia de cuáles prácticas seguir para aprender palabras nuevas efectivamente. Cuando los estudiantes planearon, monitorearon y evaluaron su progreso en el conocimiento de palabras, ellos alcanzaron la mayoría de sus objetivos y fortalecieron su competencia léxica.