dc.creatorCayo Rojas, César Félix
dc.creatorCarrillo-Marcos, Ann
dc.creatorSalazar-Correa, Giuliany
dc.creatorCastro-Ramirez, Leonor
dc.creatorLadera-Castañeda, Marysela
dc.creatorLópez-Gurreonero, Carlos
dc.creatorCachay-Criado, Hernán
dc.creatorAliaga-Mariñas, Ana
dc.creatorCornejo-Pinto, Alberto
dc.creatorCervantes-Ganoza, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T20:00:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T13:38:25Z
dc.date.available2022-08-11T20:00:44Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T13:38:25Z
dc.date.created2022-08-11T20:00:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-28
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14308/3853
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6631635
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the microhardness and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites treated with and without the application of an oxygen-inhibited layer (OIL) and a polishing system. This in vitro experimental study consisted of 72 resin composite blocks divided into three groups: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill APS, and Filtek Bulk Fill. Each resin composite group was further divided into two subgroups: with and without OIL control. Subsequently, surface roughness and microhardness were measured before and after polishing. A t-test was used to compare independent and related measures. For the intergroup comparison of variation before and after polishing, the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni post hoc was used considering a significance level of p < 0.05. When comparing surface roughness, significant differences were observed between Opus Bulk Fill resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.003) before polishing. The same occurred when comparing Tetric N-Ceram resin composite with and without OIL control (p = 0.039) after polishing. In addition, the surface roughness of Filtek Bulk Fill, Opus Bulk Fill, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites, with and without OIL control, decreased significantly after polishing (p < 0.001), while surface microhardness significantly increased (p < 0.05), with the exception of Opus Bulk Fill resin with OIL control (p = 0.413). In conclusion, OIL control and polishing significantly improved the surface roughness and surface microhardness of Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin composites. However, in the case of Opus Bulk Fill resin composite, only its surface roughness was significantly improved.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI. Revista Polymers
dc.publisherCH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.sourceUniversidad Privada San Juan Bautista
dc.sourceRepositorio institucional - UPSJB
dc.subjectResina de relleno masivo
dc.subjectEstudio comparativo
dc.subjectMateriales dentales
dc.subjectPulido dental
dc.subjectOdontología
dc.subjectCapa inhibida por oxígeno
dc.subjectCompuesto de resina
dc.subjectRugosidad de la superficie
dc.subjectMicrodureza superficial
dc.titleThe Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución