dc.contributor | De la Cruz Flores, Mario Javier | |
dc.contributor | García de Sotero, Dora Enith | |
dc.creator | Huamán Núñez, Jooy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-29T16:13:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-02T12:54:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-29T16:13:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-02T12:54:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-05-29T16:13:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12737/9106 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6546240 | |
dc.description.abstract | An effective strategy to control type 2 diabetes is to hydrolytically inhibit complex polysaccharides by pancreatic ?-amylase, reducing glucose uptake through ?-glucosidase inhibition. Our objective was to determine the inhibitory activity of Matisia cordata Bonpl leaves and bark. (MCB) and Cecropia strigosa Trécul bark (CST) on ? – glucosidase, tested at concentrations of 100, 250, 500 and 1000 ?g/mL. In none of the tested concentrations, the MCB leaf extract demonstrated an inhibition greater than 50%, that is, it is not considered active on ?-glucosidase; while the bark extract at 1000 ?g/mL showed 55.08% and the CST bark obtained 50.42%. An IC50=908.04 ?g for MCB bark extract; Compared with that of CST bark with IC50= 984.94 ?g, it allows us to conclude that the MCB bark extract is the most active ?-glucosidase inhibitor. | |
dc.description.abstract | Una estrategia eficaz para controlar la diabetes tipo 2 es inhibir de forma hidrolítica polisacáridos complejos por la ?-amilasa pancreática, reduciendo la captación de glucosa mediante inhibición de ?-glucosidasa. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la actividad inhibidora de hojas y corteza de Matisia cordata Bonpl. (MCB) y corteza de Cecropia strigosa Trécul (CST) sobre ? – glucosidasa, probada en concentraciones de 100, 250, 500 y 1000 ?g/mL. En ninguna de las concentraciones probadas, el extracto de hoja de MCB demostró una inhibición superior al 50%, es decir, no se considera activo sobre ?-glucosidasa; mientras que el extracto de corteza a 1000 ?g/mL mostró 55,08% y el de corteza de CST obtuvo un 50,42%. Un IC50=908,04 ?g para extracto de corteza de MCB; comparado con la de corteza de CST con IC50= 984,94 ?g, nos permite concluir que el extracto de corteza de MCB es el inhibidor de ?-glucosidasa más activo. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana | |
dc.publisher | PE | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Extractos vegetales | |
dc.subject | Inhibidores de glicósido hidrolasas | |
dc.subject | Cultivo in vitro | |
dc.subject | Matisia cordata | |
dc.subject | Cecropia strigosa | |
dc.title | Actividad inhibitoria de hojas y corteza de Matisia cordata Bonpl y corteza de Cecropia strigosa Trécul sobre α - glucosidasa | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | |