| dc.creator | Pericchi Guerra, Luis R. | |
| dc.creator | Pérez, María Eglée | |
| dc.date | 2012-11-21T04:15:00Z | |
| dc.date | 2012-11-21T04:15:00Z | |
| dc.date | 2009-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-17T16:53:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-03-17T16:53:57Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10586 /311 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/647452 | |
| dc.description | Two clinical trials (past and present), conjugate priors are compared
with (Robust) Cauchy- Student-t and what we call Berger's prior.
The behavior of the latter Robust Bayesian methods is
qualitatively di erent from Conjugate Bayesian Methods and
arguably much more reasonable and acceptable to the practitioner
and regulatory agencies. | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | International Workshop on Objective Bayes Methodology (OBayes 09), | |
| dc.subject | clinical trials | |
| dc.subject | robust bayesian methods | |
| dc.subject | conjugate bayesian methods | |
| dc.subject | statistical analysis | |
| dc.title | The case for a fully robust hierarchical Bayesian statistical analysis of clinical trials | |
| dc.type | Presentation | |
