Rankings, Diversity and the Power of Renewal in Science. A Comparison between Germany, the UK and the US

dc.creatorMünch, Richard
dc.creatorSchäfer, Len Ole
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-14T16:27:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T23:09:14Z
dc.date.available2014-07-14T16:27:50Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T23:09:14Z
dc.date.created2014-07-14T16:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier1465-3435
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2906
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6419006
dc.description.abstractRankings are part and parcel of the neoliberal agenda in science aiming at increasing the competitive allocation of funds among universities. This article focuses on the decreasing power of renewal in science as a result of this agenda particularly because of its increasingly consolidated stratification of the academic system into élite and mass institutions. A comparison based on data from the Academic Ranking of World Universities of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University between the less stratified German system, the more strongly stratified British system, and the most strongly stratified, though at its heart still diverse US-American system provides a first test of the hypotheses.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.subjectCalidad de la educación
dc.subjectEducación superior
dc.subjectUniversidades
dc.subjectBibliometría
dc.titleRankings, Diversity and the Power of Renewal in Science. A Comparison between Germany, the UK and the US
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución