dc.date.accessioned2022-11-15T23:04:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T18:54:30Z
dc.date.available2022-11-15T23:04:41Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T18:54:30Z
dc.date.created2022-11-15T23:04:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/12606
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01850-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6395143
dc.description.abstractMinimally invasive craniotomies are the subject of increasing attention over the last two decades in neurosurgery, following the current trend of attempting to increase patient safety by providing surgeries with less tissue disruption, blood loss, and decreased operative time. However, a significant information overlap exists among the various keyhole approaches regarding their indications and differences with more invasive techniques. Therefore, the present study aims to comprehensively review, illustrate, and describe the potential benefits and disadvantages of minimally invasive techniques to access the anterior and middle fossa, including the mini-pterional, mini orbito-zygomatic, supraorbital, lateral supraorbital, and extended lateral supraorbital approaches while comparing them to classic, more invasive approaches.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationNeurosurgical Review
dc.relation1437-2320
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectMinimally invasive craniotomies
dc.subjectCraniotomies
dc.subjectNeurosurgical approache
dc.titleMinimally invasive craniotomies for lesions of the anterior and middle fossa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución